18

Previous posts:

Hi, I'm continuing the work on the Custom Question Lists project. (See the above links for more details.) This post includes details about what I've been working on including things that have just shipped and what's in the pipeline.

Table of Contents

  • Phase 1 update, what's been fixed and what's been changed
  • Phase 2 (saving) update, shipping early November 2018
  • Phase 3 (activity indicator) update, currently working on architectural design

Phase 1: Cheese has been moved, bugs have been squashed

If you've opted into Custom Question Lists (CQL), you've probably noticed some small changes. These include bug fixes as well as some design changes I needed for Phase 2. Below is a list of what's new and why I made the choices I made.

  • Bug fix: Complex tag queries are preserved when switching tabs. Previously, if you visited javascript and php and clicked on Newest, you would be taken to javascript or php. This was a product of how the tag string was transformed at various points a long the way. Now the whole tag string is preserved on navigation.

  • The tag editor now supports and|or|not keywords. Building on the above fix, the filter tag editor now supports all the rich queries available in the URL. If you want to see top voted, unanswered questions tagged javascript php or python ruby or active questions tagged javascript not jquery, you can now do that from inside the UI. It translates between - and not when converting to and from URLs and tries to eliminate multiple consecutive operators. There's an open UX question on whether this will be confusing to users who don't know about or aren't expecting operators, and there's some previous work from new-nav that addressed that, which could be considered.

  • If you're on a custom filter, you'll see a highlighted "Custom" tab. We didn't really have an indicator of where you were before.

  • Bug fix: Filtering by watched doesn't disable filtering by watched. Before, when you would select watched tags, it would redirect you to /questions/tagged/a+or+b+or+c... where a, b, and c are your watched tags. This would break the UI logic that let you check or uncheck the watched tags filter. Now, watched tags consistently lands you on /questions/tagged?tagMode=Watched, which gets us the right UI treatment and simplifies the UI logic. Incidentally, we were already doing this with /unanswered/tagged for watched tags.

  • Tagging behavior has been restructured. (And needs to be restructured again.) Before, there was a "Watched" checkbox and a tag field. Now we have radio buttons for three tag modes:

    • Use current tags: This is the default mode which ignores the value of the tag editor and just navigates you to the URL. (This option doesn't really need to be there and exists purely an implementation detail of other parts of the code. I was gonna do something cool with it but it turned out to be confusing so I'm gonna rip it out and you can just ignore it until then. "Custom tags" gets highlighted when you edit tags anyway.)
    • My watched tags: This navigates you to your watched tags when the filter is applied.
    • Custom tags: This navigates you to a question list with tags from the tag editor when applied.

    I could go into more details about why "Use current tags" exists, but I'm bad at explaining it.

  • Bug fix: Tabs are links again. I'm a huge fan of opening things in new browser tabs, and that's back. It was just a matter of rendering the links server-side.

  • Bug fix 1,2: Paging is fixed. The code just hadn't been updated to use the new paths.

  • Bug fix: The c++ tag works again. We were encoding + as %2b, but we were still encoding spaces as +, so the backend still interpreted it as cmake+c++ or cmake c.

Beyond that, some other changes have been implemented in the Phase 2 branch and while they haven't shipped, are worth describing now in case there are any questions:

  • The "Most Popular" sort will be removed. "Most Popular" was an attempt to bring the Hot, Week, and Month tabs into the question list, because right now Teams users don't have them on their homepage. There are three reasons why I'm removing this feature:

    • It wasn't actually working as implemented. This is because...
    • From a technical standpoint, popularity is different from other question lists. It uses information that's not in TagEngine to generate its own unique ranking system. This makes it both less flexible than other lists and less capable of integrating with other features of CQL.
    • From a design standpoint, I personally feel like the hot questions list still belongs on the homepage and not in Questions. My reason for saying this is that I view the homepage as a "best of the site" discovery area and Questions is for when you have something specific you're looking for. With that criteria, the homepage is a better fit for that content.

    There's still discussion within the company about what the homepage will become in the long term and if Questions gets morphed into that or the homepage can no longer hold hot questions, we'll be able to revisit putting them here. In the mean time, I've opened a task to look at putting hot questions back on the homepage for Teams users. There's not a lot that needs to be done code-wise (the content never actually went away). It's more a matter of reviewing the original rationale and making sure we're doing the right thing.

  • Filtering to "Today/Week/Month" will be removed. These were added to support "Most Popular". Without that, however, they lack a clear or consistent definition across the different sorts and filters and wouldn't really have value beyond just cutting off the tail of the list.

Where are things with Phase 2?

Phase 2, the ability to save CQLs, is moving along. The data model has been finalized and the UI bits are mostly in place, although dealing with the tag editor continues to interesting. Things should get wired up and ready for designer and architecture review next week. Then we can get it in front of you.

Where are things with Phase 3?

Phase 3 involves introducing saved lists to the left nav and providing an indicator method for new content.

  • The left nav stuff is mostly pinned down, except for challenges relating to Teams. Those are well understood but will be a pain to work through. We have decided that the question lists visible in left nav will reflect the area of the site you're currently on, so if you're viewing public, you'll see your CQLs for the public site. If you're viewing a team, you'll see your CQLs for that team.
  • The indicator logic is more tentative. Updating indicators via events in SQL presents its own performance constraints, especially when dealing with more complicated queries. The architecture team is exploring whether or not we can use TagEngine, the indexer that feeds the question list, to update the indicator while indexing changes. There are plenty of moving parts and stale caches to consider.

That was a lot to get through and I know I haven't addressed everyone's issues and concerns. If I haven't covered your specific bug or comment, I will try looping back to you on the previous post. If my reply is unsatisfactory or missing, feel free to add it again as an answer here. Likewise, if you have any thought, concerns or bugs you notice with the latest changes, please add it as an answer here.

8
  • 1
    Better UX support for tag AND and OR combos is a pretty good direction to be headed in. See also: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/231693/…
    – Shog9
    Commented Nov 1, 2018 at 22:20
  • Where's my custom question lists? I opted in what feels like a month ago...
    – Laurel
    Commented Nov 2, 2018 at 1:51
  • @Laurel I’ll look into it in the morning. I thought we started auto-approving everyone who opted in, but maybe something went wrong. Sorry about that. Commented Nov 2, 2018 at 3:07
  • @Laurel You should see them now. I completely misunderstood the alpha test process and when I heard we had "enrolled all the testers", I thought that included going forward. Commented Nov 2, 2018 at 16:58
  • Hi @BrianNickel is there an update regarding saved CQLs? Commented Nov 21, 2018 at 12:08
  • @MEE It's running behind schedule. It is going into architecture review today. Commented Nov 26, 2018 at 16:27
  • @BrianNickel ok so that means it will be released ... somewhere in the next weeks? Commented Nov 26, 2018 at 16:28
  • @MEE That's what I'm hoping. Commented Nov 26, 2018 at 16:29

4 Answers 4

4

, probably.

Where is "unanswered"?

There is no option to filter the questions here to match the Unanswered page, i.e. questions with no upvoted answers.

1
  • 1
    "No accepted answer" actually means "Not closed or locked, with upvoted or accepted answers", which is what you get from the unanswered tab. The naming isn't great there. Also, the Unanswered and Unanswered (my tags) CQL tabs are incorrectly using "No Answers" and sorting by "Newest" instead of "Most Votes". I've fixed everything but the naming in the Phase 2 branch. Commented Nov 15, 2018 at 21:34
3

Can the custom search ignore my ignored-tags?

For example, in Arqade we have and tons of variants. I am usually not excited to see those, so I put them on my ignore list. However, I am interested in the logic and builds of . But since both tags usually exist at the same time in the questions, I can't search for the (My option is set to hide the ignored instead of graying out).

However, in StackOverflow, while I watch for and , I have no interest in seeing any question also tagged with , since I have no idea how that works, so the current way the system do it works as intended.

2
  • Does searching for [minecraft-redstone] -[minecraft] not do what you want?
    – mdewey
    Commented Jan 30, 2019 at 13:58
  • There are no questions tagged with only [minecraft-redstone], so it falls on another ignore condition :/ I wanted to see what has redstone, regardless of what I ignored if possible
    – Moacir
    Commented Jan 30, 2019 at 14:00
3

What is the status of previously-reported bugs and requests? Are they still being considered, or do we need to report them again?

(This question brought to you by missing count for results.)

1

I just discovered that the "today", "last week" and "last month" filters have been removed again. This was a feature I used in the "old nav", and the only filter (apart from tags) that I found much value in when browsing questions on Stack Overflow.

The value of this is to read the top voted recent questions in my favourite tags. To give me back some faith that there could still be some new quality content on the site after trying to make a dent in the never ending "Close Votes" queue.

The main "week" and "month" tabs are pretty useless as long as I can't filter by tags, so most questions in those feeds are irrelevant to me.

Here's some missing filters I wish existed, and that I think would make it easier to find quality questions I would be able to answer.

  • Questions with at least one upvote.
  • Filter by asker's reputation (Much more likely to be interesting, readable and complete)
  • Question that contain at least some code block and some prose (or some such heuristics that can roughly filter out the most incoherent and low effort questions)
  • Questions with at least one close vote. (If it has one close vote, chances are it will eventually get more and be culled from the feed. But in the meantime, it's still unanswerable, so I'd rather not see it at all)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .