I've come across this feature request in the featured tab. It already has the maximum 5 tags, so there is no room for a status tag. It seems that it either must stay as it is with no status tags, or one of the tags must be removed to allow room for a status tag. This seems a little bit pointless, since all it's tags relate to the question.

To solve this, the limit of 5 tags could be removed for moderator-only tags in order to be able to place status tags on questions that already have 5 tags.

  • IMO, this will be feasible only if the status won't be set as a tag but as a banner, with the title itself changed, like it's doing today with closed questions. (i.e. the status change won't be direct part of the question.) – Shadow The Dragon Wizard Dec 18 '18 at 8:36

It's reasonably common that (even without a status-* tag) you can find six or more tags that apply to a question. However, in most cases, only two or three are essential.

In your case, the and tags can certainly be missed; in fact, a new tag for questions about s would IMHO be more appropriate. (This tag itself is already used for actual retag requests, most of which should be closed/migrated away to Meta Stack Overflow because they're about Stack Overflow, but I digress).

A good way to see this is the number of watchers. has 55, has 32, while the other two have 3 and 7. There might be some people actively following those tags, but it's also likely that they misclicked the old 'favorite' and/or the new 'Watch Tag' button.

  • It's also likely that several people watched [*tags*], and thus wildcarded their way into the watched tags list. – Laurel Dec 18 '18 at 6:44
  • Maybe meta-retag-request (like meta-faq)? – Anne Daunted Dec 18 '18 at 15:57
  • That, or [retag-request-process], like feature-request-process. – Glorfindel Dec 18 '18 at 15:58
  • [retag-request-process] sounds good and a bit clearer. – Anne Daunted Dec 18 '18 at 16:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .