Today I learned that if the user is suspended network-wide this means nothing due to possibility of the specific site moderator drop this suspension on the site.

Why it's allowed, and what is the meaning of such suspension. In partucular, user is contributing on a couple of sites, then they was suspened network-wide (all two sites), after that unsuspended by the mod on the one of that site. Should the user be suspended on the one site only in such case? Or if the mod is right (but the network-wide suspender is not) then the user should be unsuspended globally.

  • 2
    It's a lot easier to suspend someone on every site and then whitelist them on a few than it is to do it manually. Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 16:14
  • 3
    It is probably simply not worth the developer time, given that suspension itself is an edge case (added later, goes against the paradigm of acting against behavior and not users...) Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 16:15

1 Answer 1


Network-wide suspension is an expedient way to suspend a user network-wide, covering even sites they may not have joined yet. That's not frequently useful, which is why it isn't frequently used... But in those rare situations where someone is going out of their way to spam / troll / harass multiple sites in a short period of time it is a handy tool.

I start with that description because you need to understand: network-wide suspension is not a necessary escalation from per-site suspension. That is, one might conceivably be suspended numerous times on a single site without ever being suspended anywhere else; one might even see their account deleted on one site without that resulting in consequences elsewhere. Network-suspension is a specialized tool for a small set of relatively specialized circumstances; in some ways it is more limited than normal per-site suspensions. For example, there's no corresponding network-wide "unsuspend".

With that in mind, please consider this hypothetical scenario:

  1. User acts up on one site, gets a short suspension
  2. User flies into a blind rage, hits numerous other sites to post rants against whomever they blame for the consequences of their actions in #1
  3. Employee suspends user network-wide to avoid having to spend all evening chasing them across the network.

Now, at this point the user hasn't actually caused problems on most sites, and even on the site where they originally acted up there's some possibility that they would be able to resolve the situation once they've calmed down and can have a sensible discussion with the mod team. Which is to say, it's completely reasonable that they might be able to negotiate a reduced suspension on one site or another - after all, they could always be suspended again if they go back to causing trouble.

But talking an employee into manually unsuspending them on 170+ sites is another matter. That's a fair bit of extra work to solve a problem that the user should've known better than to cause in the first place. Said employee is much more likely to advise them to either wait it out, or negotiate on a site-by-site basis.

  • 1
    I don't want to add an extra answer, but it may be worth noting that Stack Exchange has a long time policy against fixing "bugs" during (not with) suspensions. (Q: "Why is this not possible??", A: "It's not worth fixing because you are ... suspended?!") Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 17:26
  • 4
    Not so much a policy as it is constructive use of limited time.
    – Shog9
    Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 17:33
  • yes I know, I just was unable to find a better word. Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 17:34
  • 1
    I have (just out of curiosity) a question. Would it be possible to suspend a user on one site and then (because of db editing or html ninja-skills (altering the select box)) making this suspension having the reason string "network-wide"? Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 17:36
  • 2
    Sure. Could also make the reason "Because I felt like it" or "Something MEE said". What's your point?
    – Shog9
    Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 17:45
  • 2
    just curiosity, @Shog9, just curiosty goes away, becomes a mod and writes a userscript for funnier suspension reasons Commented Feb 4, 2019 at 20:23
  • 1
    "there's no corresponding network-wide 'unsuspend'" Isn't it possible to, without going through and reversing the suspensions on all the sites, to simply remove the mark on the network profile that causes the system to impose new suspensions whenever new accounts are created? This way, in case a user does "calm down and discuss it with a mod", new accounts they create won't be suspended, they can delete and recreate inactive accounts, and ask mods on sites they were active on to lift the local suspension (on the grounds that the network-wide suspension "mark" was removed by staff)? Commented Apr 26, 2019 at 10:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .