0

(https://webapps.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/111499 shows action by both.) [Edit: At first glance they both looked like special users. Not so.]

2

2 Answers 2

5

Community♦ is a special user. Community is credited for reviews when they are:

  • Done by deleted users

  • Improved, in which case Community is shown as having approved the edit

  • Rejected and edited, in which case Community is shown as having rejected the edit

user0 is a normal user who just happens to have "0" in the username. user0 approved the edit before it was improved by a different user.

2
  • @MatthewElvey users with a negative ID (e.g. -1 for Community) are special users. Normal users (e.g. 186471 for user0) have a positive ID. Commented Mar 19, 2019 at 13:39
  • 2
    @MatthewElvey Rejected edit suggestions don't show up in revision lists. You need to look at your edit suggestions. Or I can be nice and link you. ;) meta.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/63581
    – Catija
    Commented Mar 27, 2019 at 4:51
0

A key difference is that their real user numbers, respectively, are -1 for Community♦ and 186471 for user0 (on webapps, and thus not 0), as can be seen in the URL (classically displayed in a browser's status bar when mousing over the usernames) that clicking on the name opens.

Community♦ (/community is tacked on the end of the canonical URL) is a special user.

But user0 (/user0 is tacked on the end of the canonical URL) is a normal user who just happens to have "0" in the username. user0 approved the edit before it was improved by a different user.

I found no true user 0 - no user with ID 0 on any SE sites.
There is also no user with ID 1 on some SE sites, but there IS a user with ID 1 on other SE sites.

1
  • 4
    All of the sites with "no user ID 1" had such users at their beginnings, but those users later deleted their accounts. Commented Mar 27, 2019 at 6:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .