2

I find it a bit strange, that Stack Overflow is that restrictive at times and locks up/downvotes after some minutes have passed.

Why is there a need to lock votes at all? Isn't it potentially contra productive?

Example

I today found an answer of how to check if string values are only using the English character set. I found one answer good & simple and tried to use it, so I upvoted. During testing however, I recognized, that it was not working correctly, because important characters like even space were not recognized as English characters. So I thought it was not justified to upvote the answer to make it more attractive to other people, who see the answer, but I simply couldn't correct it.

Can you tell me, what would have been wrong, taking back my upvote, or even downvoting this answer again?

Possible Result of locking votes too early

Probably there are plenty of answers, that look appealing at first, because they are simple and are getting upvoted because of this frequently, but once the users recognize the answer is wrong, they can't correct it anymore.

That is, the most competent votes (the ones of actual testers) are potentially blocked this way.

Summary and final plea

To come back to my initial question, why it is needed at all to lock votes. I read the arguments here and partially it makes sense to try to get the people to be more thoughtful about what they upvote, but I wonder how many users of Stack Overflow are active that frequently that this really has a big impact. I mean, if most of the users are only reading answers and maybe posting questions every now and then (as I did until not so long ago), then most of the votes will not be done as thoroughly, as we might wish and so I fear, what I described above will have a big impact (that answers that appear simple, but forget half of the job) are upvoted.

I would appreciate, if locking of votes would be abandoned or at least, that the period in which votes can be changed, would be made much longer, so users have a fair chance to chance their votes after testing (say 3 days at least, so also weekends are no problem). Once again, many of the SO users probably see a possible answer, give their thank-yous, upvotes and probably will not return to SO for the same question, if the answer they got from SO solves their problem. That's what you should think of when choosing the period in which a vote can be changed.

Disclaimer

BTW. I think the post I used as an example is not that bad. It doesn't really harm someone, but you know, if it wouldn't already have about 10 upvotes, I also wouldn't have considered it to be a valid and highly appreciated answer and would probably have been led to the right one immediately.

7

The tooltip on the upvote answer button says

This answer is useful

and not

This answer looks useful

(emphasis mine)

If you intend to try out an answer, try it out first and then upvote it. Or downvote it and/or leave a comment if it doesn't work. If you can improve the answer, you can (suggest an) edit; an edit allows you to retract votes. (But note that editing a post just to retract an upvote is bordering abuse.)

You've highlighted a (rare) situation where retracting a vote after five minutes would make sense, but I guarantee that the abuse cases mentioned in Tim Post's answer (tactical downvoting, revenge unupvoting) would be much more common if Stack Exchange did always allow retracting votes. An extended period of 3 days would probably prevent revenge unupvoting but definitely not tactical downvoting.

What's more important: the system simply can't distinguish one case from another. It already has a hard time catching some of the serial voting going on - catching abuse of undoing votes is even more difficult since those votes are deleted if they are undone on the same day.

4

We had people messing around voting up and down the same question repeatedly in an attempt presumably to get the attention of the answerer for some issue or other. Rather than allow people to basically interrupt a poster by waving in their face all day we restrict changing voting except within an initial grace period or if the post is edited.

Feel free to check out answers first so you know they work for you and then vote.

Additionally, if you think there's a problem with an answer you can always add a comment asking the poster to address it or explain it.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .