10

Currently there exists a special case of , namely . The latter refers explicitly to the minimum length of comments. Seeing the relative low amount of questions on the latter tag (only 9), and that there already is an appropriate way to indicate a question is in regard to comments (). I think we should burninate .

  • 1
    Or just remove 15-characters? – Daniel Fischer Nov 1 at 11:21
  • Yes.‎‏‎‏‎‏‎‏‎‏‎‏ – Athari says Reinstate Monica Nov 1 at 11:22
  • Seeing there are no answers yet, Ill redress this as a burnination question then. @StopHarmingMonica – Luuklag Nov 1 at 11:36
  • 1
    Burnination is way overkill. With such a small tag, going through it and manually retagging the questions is doable for a single person in a few minutes. Then the tag will, if not re-used, be deleted by the system after a day. – Daniel Fischer Nov 1 at 11:43
  • @DanielFischer I agree, but perhaps someone comes up with a valid reason not to remove the tag. I'd rather hear that now then javing to undo the changes later. – Luuklag Nov 1 at 11:44
  • Quite. That's why I haven't started editing yet. – Daniel Fischer Nov 1 at 11:51
  • [status-burninated]! – Columbia says Reinstate Monica Nov 1 at 16:51
4

I think so too.

In fact, I'm going to take the liberty to change all the questions with this tag to use instead.

describes all of the questions much better than does.

  • 5
    I'd rather see you wait a few days, in case anyone brings up any valid concerns as why not to do this. – Luuklag Nov 1 at 12:14
  • 1
    @Luuklag No, not really, It's status-completed now anyways, fait accompli. – iBug says Reinstate Monica Nov 1 at 12:16
  • 2
    Also next time a more informative edit description would be helpful, @JL2210 – Luuklag Nov 1 at 12:29
  • @Luuklag Whoops, sorry. Will do. – user474678 Nov 1 at 15:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .