20

A group of SE users and I are collaborating on an open-source project similar to the SE network (basically an alternative for frustrated users), and I would like to get the word out to interested SE users. I am currently using my profile description to advertise, but my profile doesn't get a lot of exposure.

Am I permitted to:

  1. Include a short link to the project in the comments section of my own personal post?

  2. Bring it up in conversation where the user shows visible desire to move away from the SE network?

  3. Include a link to the project in my answers to other posts?

Just to note - I am aware of what qualifies as "responsible" advertising and I don't want to cause spam around the site. Are any of the above options allowed on Meta.SE?

And if the answer is no, then so be it - I just figured I'd ask before somebody got angry.

  • 7
    I wouldn't be surprised if your profile's about me is wiped. – Peilonrayz Nov 20 '19 at 0:52
  • 4
    @Peilonrayz I don't think it would be surprising, but it would definitely wouldn't be in their best interest to wipe it considering how it would look against them (the whole censorship issue). – connectyourcharger parted ways Nov 20 '19 at 0:53
  • Some tips from Jeff Atwood blog.codinghorror.com/… – Mari-Lou A Nov 20 '19 at 8:06
  • You could talk outside of SE about it. – Trilarion Nov 20 '19 at 10:04
  • 5
    It appears that the treatment of "About me profiles" has changed from "Zardoz" to "Don't compete with SE, criticize SE, or otherwise make SE powers-that-be feel like you're doing any of the above." – George Stocker Nov 20 '19 at 19:21
19

Well, I suspect actively promoting the project would likely be a bad idea. Imagine if someone constantly advertised, say a Reddit subredit or something else.

Practically if you're choosing to run your own breakaway network, SE isn't really obliged to support it, and as a moderator - I'd be looking at it as per any other external link. In context, with reasonable disclosure and assuming your only goal isn't promotion of the alternative site(s), it might work.

As a platform - adding it here would be all right I suspect.

I'd also consider that it doesn’t look very good when you're basically trying to leverage the site you're trying to move off of to build your own. Jeff probably didn't.

| improve this answer | |
  • To be fair, I have recently redirected someone to a subreddit for a very niche topic that has been brought up many times there, but there is no SE/SO site or tag that would encompass the entire question. – Drew Nov 20 '19 at 3:48
  • @Drew, that is hardly considered "constantly", and thus should be fine. Even more so when there is no support to be expected from the SE network. – Luuklag Nov 20 '19 at 8:24
  • Jeff who? Jeff Atwood? – P.Mort. - forgot Clay Shirky_q Nov 20 '19 at 18:29
  • 1
    Not sure if meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2267/… is already a good place to post the project mentioned here. It's in a very, very early development stage as far as I can see and calling it an alternative might not really be justified currently. – Trilarion Nov 20 '19 at 18:52
  • Well, no point advertising too early. – Journeyman Geek Nov 21 '19 at 3:34
16

I think that all the use cases that you describe could be reasonably described as seeking free advertising and, no matter what they were advertising, would be removed with a redirection to where advertising can be purchased from Stack Overflow at https://www.stackoverflowbusiness.com/advertising.

I think your question here can also be reasonably interpreted as an advertisement for your profile and project.

| improve this answer | |
  • 4
    Noted. The question itself was not intended as an advertisement but I can see how it could have been taken that way. – connectyourcharger parted ways Nov 20 '19 at 0:41
4

This is no different from promoting a book or another web resource or service. The rules for that are as far as I know that they are okay if they serve a purpose of their own, e.g. in your case if the topic is alternatives to Stack Exchange (indeed there is at least one meta thread about that). Otherwise if the purpose is only advertisement don't post about it.

In the cases, where there is a legitimate use, but you are somehow affiliated with the product, service or else, it's typically good to add a disclaimer about your connections to it.

| improve this answer | |
1

We constantly link to wikipedia, github, personal blogs and other sources of information. When the link is usefull and relevant in the context (links to personal pages in your profile are usefull) then it is not really like advertising.

So in principle it seems ok. But, in practice the problem is when somebody overly self promotes. One can bring up a book or article when relevant, but sometimes it may occur a lot and also when the link is not so strong.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    That's why we also require a disclaimer in case of ties to the promoted service. This allows to gauge and keep in check the self promotion. – Trilarion Nov 20 '19 at 18:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .