18

Comparing leaderboard of 2019 with last year, It seems I did the same this time too (missing out on 2 hats again). But nobody got all the hats this year when last year there were six people. And even for the top spot, the tie was with two people only (missing one/one hat each).

It seems apparent to me participation was lesser this year and most of it was due to the most controversial year of StackExchange. Or maybe due to lack of originality.

So I wanted to know if we have comparative statistics of 2019 Winter Bash with previous years; like no. of participants, top sites with most hats, top users getting hats above some threshold (75% or 80%), etc.

1
  • 5
    @aparente001 Not only about 2018 but for previous years too if possible Jan 2, 2020 at 7:57

1 Answer 1

7

Here are the stats from all Winter Bashes.

Year Users Hats Winners # of Winners
2012 46710 108924 N/A* N/A
2013 76586 214172 Logan M 1
2014 84442 244872 Logan M, Martijn Pieters, rolfl, Mike Miller 4
2015 72184 322755 Quill, David, Bhargav Rao 3
2016 215961 797078 Alexander O'Mara, alecxe, Eran, David 4
2017 173054 546504 A J, David, alecxe 3
2018 335281 604061 alecxe, Alexander O'Mara, Eran, Panda, eLRuLL 5
2019 163865 265946 David, X-27 wants to Reinstate Monica 2

* The N/A from 2012 is because there was no network leaderboard. The network leaderboard started in 2013.

Before you look at the numbers and think this year had lower participation, you have to realize all is not equal.
It's not fair to compare the leader getting all the hats one year vs this year missing some. That could simply mean the hats were easier to get last year. (Which is also supported by there being a record number of winners last year, five.)

First off what hat triggers there were made a huge difference in the number of hats collected. Some years had "Every! Body! Gets! A Hat!" which inflated the hat count. Other years had no "vote or post on X day" which greatly reduced the hat count. Then there was the "Still Fresh" hat in 2018. That added an extra 200000 hats

Further, who hed access to the WB makes a big difference. Before 2015 the WB was opt in per site. Also (and this made a big difference) on SO users had to opt in to the WB, in 2016 everybody got the WB.

Knowing all that, instead of trying to normalize the stats it is much easier to compare activity across years using hats with the same trigger.

First up is "Starred chat, ±12h from Jan 1, 0:00 UTC"

Year Hat count
2015 Auld Lang Syne 614 times, 544 distinct
2016 First Responder 605 times, 508 distinct
2017 Glasses With A Number On Top 299 times, 257 distinct
2018 Glasses With A Number On Top 320 times, 282 distinct
2019 Glasses With A Number On Top 211 times, 194 distinct

"Answer +5 a -3 question; later +3"

Year Hat count
2014 Red Baron 26
2015 Flying Tiger 11 (rarest hat ever)
2016 Maverick 17
2017 Waffles 16 times, 14 distinct
2018 Red Baron 13
2019 Red Baron 21

Granted using such a rare hat is not a good measure of over all activity, and was further skewed this year from a meta Q that granted somewhere around 15 users that hat.

"collect 11 hats"

Year Hat count
2015 Specialist Hatsman 1911 times, 1763 distinct
2016 011 2938 times, 2722 distinct
2017 The Milliner 1380 times, 1292 distinct
2019 The Milliner 311 times, 291 distinct

Now that is a striking difference. (2017 had the freebee "And YOU Get A Hat!" and three "Post or vote" hats vs 2019 had two "Post or vote" hats and no free hat.) Still there were less users getting many hats this WB.)

"Post or vote on Dec 25"

Year Hat count
2015 O Tannenbaum 21104 times, 16326 distinct
2016 Bûche de Noël 33925 times, 28770 distinct
2017 Red Hat With White Fur Trim 34350 times, 29603 distinct
2019 Bûche de Noël 40313 times, 35089 distinct

Do note that in 2017 it was a secret hat. Interesting that there were less users collecting many hats, but more users getting this hat.

Another thing to compare is the votes on the hat list posts over the years.

Year Post Vote total on question DV count
2014 Secret Hats 338 5
2015 Secret Hats 340 11
2016 All Hats 579 12
2017 Hats 210 4
2018 Hat list 197 4
2019 Hat list 74 26

Note the votes are totaled for that year's time frame, meaning the total for 2014 ended in Jan of 2015. (Thus the results are not skewed by the older posts getting more votes).
A lot less activity going to the 2019 post. The active community on meta hated this WB more then ever (probably because of the Monica issue).

All in all there were fewer users (about 5% less) that collected many fewer hats (about 94% less). Interestingly that correlates roughly to established users shunning the WB, and drive by users participating and getting a few hats.

Detailed stats: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .