The tag (currently 6 questions, all of them asked in 2011 or earlier) seems to be a very old way to refer to what are now known as close reasons.

should be a synonym of .

  • To add, all the questions using the tag are either closed or up for closure. – Sonic the Masked Werehog Jul 14 at 1:56
  • 2
    This question (and it's deleted answer) which was the second use of the tag (and additionally mod-tagged) tells of instances of usage incompatible with the proposed synonym. – Rob Jul 14 at 3:09
  • 1
    If it's only 6 question, manual retagging would suffice I think? – Mast Jul 14 at 8:48

I'd argue for retagging and removing it - since the tag on its own is a meta tag. There's no real value for it on its own.

I've retagged the questions, though looking through them, migration wasn't always the right tag. I've gone with in some cases, and completely different tags on another.

Some of the questions were confusing, referring to a primodial meta.stackexchange that predated the Meta.Stackoverflow that became Meta.Stackexchange (and not the Meta.Stackoverflow we have now), and didn't really have any historical value on their own so were deleted.

| improve this answer | |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .