2

I noticed in an old answer an edit I made over a year ago. When I checked the revision history, I realized Community ◆ should have left its Commonmark migration note in a newer revision. But that did not happen.

So, out of curiosity, why did Community ◆ not leave a note, even though the markdown render is the new type despite the old markdown I used, and by extension -- why wasn't it suppressed everywhere? You know, instead of...

enter image description here :D

Example for same style where there was a record: https://aviation.stackexchange.com/posts/29389/revisions


In case something changes, here are screenshots:

enter image description here

5
6

That answer was simply left alone and has not been re-rendered on the new Markdown system yet. If you attempt to edit it, the formatting will break because it does not use correct syntax for blockquotes.

Not all posts were edited during the migration. Some were skipped because of issues that made it hard or impossible to update the post because we couldn't determine what the intention was or attempting to fix it automatically would break the post further. So their old rendering was left there until someone manually edits and fixes it. This was also explained in the announcement for the migration.

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .