I've recently been browsing three sites on this network dedicated to major religions: Judaism, Christianity and Islam. And I found it jarring to see answers like the below, some of which are highly upvoted:
I believe that, on certain sites, it is important to allow discussion of potentially offensive/alienating content related to religious stances or old literature, but not to state the content as fact, endorse it, or go off on personal rants. E.G:
"It's just logic that homosexuality is immoral. Homosexuals should try conversion therapy"
"Saint So-and-So considered homosexuality "immoral" and recommended conversion therapy"
"Saint So-and-So considered homosexuality "immoral" and recommended conversion therapy which was common at the time, but modern medical institutions widely consider conversion therapy practices ineffective and potentially harmful"
I believe these answers violate the code of conduct. I tried to resolve this through the individual sites by suggesting edits that removed this content from the answers, but didn't get too far so I'm bringing up here to discuss the topic and hopefully prod some change into action on enforcement policy.
Addendum: what I've done since starting this discussion
Following the initial response here, I have contacted SE, flagged the content (once I got enough reputation), discussed it in chats, suggested deletion of the content, and made this meta post. I'm now aware that using the edit-suggest feature to suggest post deletion is not how the site intends it to be used (I could have instead gained enough reputation on those subsites to vote-delete), but I'd prefer the discussion stayed on topic rather than just on my actions/missteps.