12

The has 32 questions, no tag wiki or excerpt. A quarter of those are questions about Greasemonkey scripts that have been closed and should've been posted on StackApps. For those questions, plugins, and scripts, we have the and tags, which do have specific excerpts that would prevent users from using them incorrectly. A few of those questions look like they could do without them entirely.

Should we burn it? Or synonymize and to it, with a new excerpt?

Improve this question
3
  • 6
    This tag is... gibberish; it could mean "enhance the browser", like a feature request, it could mean the question refers to a browser feature, which isn't on topic, it could mean userscript development, which you already covered... I don't understand what it's supposed to mean. Looks like it was originally created for that last case, if it was created for the oldest question tagged with it. I vote burn away.
    – zcoop98
    Commented Sep 16, 2021 at 15:14
  • 1
    Yes, we should burn it.
    – no ai please
    Commented Sep 16, 2021 at 20:31
  • Burned! ..and I was sort of looking forward to checking out those grease monkey scripts..
    – Nate T
    Commented Sep 25, 2021 at 0:28

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
3

The tag has been removed from all 32 questions and will be gone within 24 hours. As is becoming the norm with s, here's a record of what moderation actions were taken during the burnination (AFAIK) either by diamond moderators, staff members, or just regular users:

Deletion

  • 5 questions were deleted (10K only): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

Closure

Thanks to Spevacus, Rob, Ryan and all the community members (and staff members) that helped out with this burnination!

waffles

Improve this answer
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .