18

I'm always bugged by the inconsistency of this:

Old Question/Answer http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/2975/sospecificdatetime.png Yesterday http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/8515/soyesterday.png

I don't mind the "3 hours ago" thing so much for same-day questions, but it doesn't make much sense to me that I can see the specific time of day for old questions/answers but not for entries submitted yesterday. Wouldn't most people be much more likely to care about the time of day for newer questions? And it looks like there's more than enough room in there to add the at hh:mm text.

Call it nit-picking if you like, but I frequently find myself looking at the time stamps when I see two answers on a question that are almost the same, and want to vote up the one that doesn't plagiarize. Anyway, I think the UI consistency argument alone justifies the request.

...Right?

|improve this question
  • 9
    Jeff means "status-dontcare". – Ether Mar 28 '10 at 3:43
  • 3
    That does seem to be the message, doesn't it? Lol, of course it's "by design", it's the design that's being questioned here! Almost reminds me of "works as coded." – Aarobot Mar 28 '10 at 14:32
6

If this suggestion is declined, or until it is implemented, you could always accomplish this with a Greasemonkey script. I knew timestamps were recorded in UTC, but I didn't realize they were always displayed in UTC.

<span title="2010-03-15 18:40:23Z" class="relativetime">Mar 15 at 18:40</span>

At any rate, you can uncomment the one line in there to convert from UTC to your local time. That, though, may produce incorrect results for timestamps close to midnight.

var $ = (typeof unsafeWindow !== "undefined") ? unsafeWindow.$ : window.$;
function parseDate(s)
{
    var d = new Date(s.replace("Z", "").replace(/-/g, "/"));
    //d.setTime(d.getTime() - d.getTimezoneOffset() * 60000);
    return d.getHours().toString() + ":" + (d.getMinutes()+100).toString().substring(1);
}

$("span.relativetime").each(function ()
{
    if(this.innerHTML == "yesterday")
        this.innerHTML = "yesterday at " + parseDate(this.title);
});
|improve this answer
7

If you keep your cursor hovering over the 'yesterday' for a few seconds, the exact timestamp will appear as a tooltip.

|improve this answer
  • 5
    Interesting... it works, but it's completely non-discoverable (I've been using this site for several months and never realized that), and it's pretty awkward when trying to do comparisons. Thank you for the tip though. – Aarobot Mar 28 '10 at 2:17
  • 3
    @Aaron that's why I normally browse the site with answers sorted oldest first rather than by votes. – Joel Coehoorn Mar 28 '10 at 3:02
  • @JoelCoehoorn: I'm curious why you care about the relative post time of answers? They should not matter at all. – Lightness Races BY-SA 3.0 Jul 14 '17 at 17:40
  • 1
    @LightnessRacesinOrbit When voting for an answer, I want to know the order. Sometimes a later answer isn't as deserving at it seems when taken in context with answers that came before. – Joel Coehoorn Jul 14 '17 at 19:42
  • @joel Hmm ideally we would analyse posts in their own right but ok – Lightness Races BY-SA 3.0 Jul 14 '17 at 20:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .