Please read before voting to close as dup. This question is an earlier instance of the same problem. I don't think this should be closed as dup because new changes have taken place since then, even though the old question is closed [status-complete]. (I'm also not sure why that was marked complete if Jonathan and Gumbo were not added to the list.)

The list of moderators on Meta's "about" page is out of date.

  • Diago is still listed.
  • Jonathan Sampson is not listed.
  • Gumbo is not listed.
  • random is not listed (not yet a mod on meta).
  • quack quixote is not listed (not yet a mod on meta).

‘About’ Page list of moderators needs to be updated.

  • 3
    FWIW... quack and random aren't mods on Meta yet. – Shog9 Mar 29 '10 at 18:07
  • 1
    @Arjan Random and quack haven't been moderators yet here on Meta. – Kyle Cronin Mar 29 '10 at 18:29
  • 1
    Do they need to be? It's not like there is a lack of moderators here. I realize that - so far - every moderator on any of the official websites is a moderator here too, but I question the reasoning behind that decision – Thomas Bonini Mar 29 '10 at 18:34
  • 1
    I agree @kop, We should have different moderators per site... meta is a site by itself and should have its own set of moderators – juan Mar 29 '10 at 18:37
  • 4
    I refer you to the Meta FAQ: Any community moderator from Stack Overflow, Server Fault, or Super User is also a moderator here. If they are moderators elsewhere, the FAQ indicates they are automatically moderators on Meta and thus should be listed. – tvanfosson Mar 29 '10 at 18:48
  • 1
    Then the FAQ needs reviewing – juan Mar 29 '10 at 19:07
  • 2
    @Downvoter (and others closing as dup): is there a better way to report a problem when it previously existed and was fixed and marked completed, but now it has returned? closing it reduces the chance the team will see it. – Kip Mar 29 '10 at 20:38
  • 1
    @Kip: well, I guess when random and quack are made moderators, they can edit the status-complete tag out of that previous question... ;-) – Shog9 Mar 29 '10 at 20:45
  • 1
    Maybe putting the "Please read..." message first will work? :) – Bill the Lizard Mar 29 '10 at 21:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .