I recently asked a poll question on SO: What do you call the punctuation marks { and }?.
The question was created as community wiki, seemed (to me) concise and unlikely to spark controversy, and was at least peripherally programming-related. I seeded it with a few very brief answers, hoping that would encourage others to do the same. (I'm a relative newbie. I may have failed to establish it as a poll at first.)
In SO FAQ terms, I felt that it
- was not a duplicate
- was detailed and specific
- was written clearly and simply
- was of interest to at least one other programmer somewhere
- was most certainly subjective
- was not argumentative
- did not require extended discussion
It was closed fairly quickly as "subjective and argumentative". I'm not arguing that it should have been left open, nor asking that it be re-opened. If the community feels that a question is not interesting or useful, then it ought to be closed.
I'm afraid I still don't 'get' the social mores that govern SO polling. Nearly all of the most popular questions are either polls or call for highly subjective discussion. (Take a look at the "hottest questions this month"...) There would appear to be right and wrong ways of conducting polls--I'd like to hear from some SO natives.
Thanks for your thoughts.
P.S. Despite my own involvement with this question, I'd rather not see SO become a poll- and opinion-based site. SO's main strength lies in its ability to distill the experience of its many users into clear, concrete solutions to real problems.
Edit: A follow-up question: What kinds of polling questions do belong on SO? Should all polls be discouraged? (Please don't read that as sarcasm--it seems like a reasonable option.)
I suppose at its root this becomes a question of SO as programmer resource vs. SO as programmer community...