I've seen some discussions here on meta-SO where moderators have said that the appropriate action for a user who appears to be trolling in comments is to click the "Flag this comment as offensive, spam, or hate speech" flag by the comment.

Maybe you could include "trolling" in the list of reasons to flag a comment? Until I read this on MSO last week, I didn't think trolling was a subset of "offensive, abusive, or hate speech." I guess you consider it part of "offensive", but to me offensive would be something like unnecessary profanity or vulgarity.

Or maybe the problem is just that my personal interpretation of "offensive" is more narrow than others'? I don't know, just a suggestion...

(Note: when I say "trolling" here, I mean someone who makes comments that seem to be designed to start and/or egg-on an argument, rather than lead to thoughtful discussion.)


2 Answers 2


This is complete in spirit, because there are now explicit comment flag reasons:

enter image description here

I'd say comment trolling would be "rude or offensive" or "not constructive / off-topic" -- your choice.


If it is clear trolling with no real defensible value, then the moderators can get visibility of it sooner (and more obviously) with the "flag for moderator attention" ; however, for automatic processing, either "spam" or "offensive" will work fine. If you can't justify (to yourself) clicking "offensive", then click "spam" instead.

For "spam", I would include anything that is clearly not a constructive question / answer; trolling is just fine (for me) to fall into the spam trap.

  • i'm talking about flagging comments, not questions/answers. you don't pick a reason for flagging comments.
    – Kip
    Jul 13, 2009 at 13:18

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .