139

I'm thinking stackoverflow.com llc / inc should buy a brick in the Computer History Museum Wall.

It's for a noble cause -- the CHM is one of my favorite places on the planet, and the money is a non-profit donation in support of their effort to record the history of the computer.

The brick I am looking at is the Terabyte:

The wall will consist of a series of permanent high-tech plaques engraved with your message. Honor your favorite computer pioneer, recall your first technology project, or annotate any technology memory you wish to commemorate in this special area. Each engraved wall plaque will be placed in the newly remodeled entry area of the Museum, ensuring that your reminiscences will be preserved and shared for years to come.

  • Name: Terabyte
  • Price: $5000
  • Description: 8" x 8" Plaque
  • Max Lines of Text: 6
  • Max Characters per Line: 18
  • Company logo or Stock Symbol available

So, then, the question: what should our CHM plaque say?

Completed, selection made public, and payment confirmed with the Museum: Our Brick in the Computer History Museum Wall. Now we wait for October to see it live!

13
  • 17
    If you can put the APL character set on a brick, I bet you could reimplement SO in APL and it'd fit on that brick....
    – Earlz
    Apr 17, 2010 at 3:29
  • 2
    Have you verified that both the 108 characters and the logo can be accommodated? Or will someone need to do a graphic that includes the logo and some text (then the character limit may be different - higher or lower - depending on the resolution of the engraving technology)? Is there additional cost for the logo? Apr 17, 2010 at 11:13
  • 20
    I think the museum should donate this brick to you because 17,210 meta users are going to visit the museum just to see this brick. Apr 17, 2010 at 18:13
  • 7
    I took me five answers to realize that the first row of numbers were only coordinates, not actual text for the brick. Apr 17, 2010 at 23:05
  • 1
    I can think of one company that would be so much happier if their brick could hold seven lines of 20 characters. Apr 17, 2010 at 23:29
  • @Dennis - and that would be... ? Apr 19, 2010 at 0:19
  • It might be just me, but it feels kinda like buying your own hand print tile at the walk of fame.
    – Toad
    Apr 19, 2010 at 6:11
  • 1
    @George: If you do the math, the result might have a familiar ring to it. Apr 19, 2010 at 6:14
  • 5
    I really can't read a question with the words "brick in the (...) wall" without having that same song stuck in my head for the rest of the day.
    – Gnoupi
    Apr 19, 2010 at 14:15
  • 1
    @Dennis - ah. I get it now. :) Apr 19, 2010 at 17:14
  • The museum doesn't twit
    – SztupY
    Apr 20, 2010 at 18:56
  • 5
    Whatever the answer, I think it should include the 123456789012345678 numbers on it.. even if we lose a column and a row. And it must be monospaced font.
    – glasnt
    Apr 20, 2010 at 22:49
  • Why nobody ever thought of Bricky Tables? '); DROP TABLE bricks;-- (in two lines, obviously). Oh I see, historical incongruence. Jan 25, 2014 at 20:13

99 Answers 99

60
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com
2 Dedicated to the 
3 expert programmers
4 whose tireless
5 work made this
6 brick possible.

Stack Overflow Plaque at CHM

Prototype: ( Source )

Picture:

Stack Overflow Plaque at CHM

10
  • 2
    Aw. I liked a lot others more(even being serious) :(
    – Earlz
    May 13, 2010 at 6:36
  • 22
    meta is a fine place for in-jokes, but I think when you're putting words on granite (literally or metaphorically) in a public place, it's best to play it straight, simple, and clear. May 13, 2010 at 7:44
  • 18
    This one really stands out. If possible, I'd suggest a slight change so that the dedication is directed to the expert programmers rather than their tireless work : 3 expert programmers, 4 whose tireless, 5 work made this. May 13, 2010 at 12:22
  • 9
    Congratulations, I don't think it could possibly be more vanilla.
    – user1228
    May 13, 2010 at 13:40
  • 1
    @ben good idea -- done! May 14, 2010 at 9:24
  • 1
    @Mehrdad To be honest, I don't think that's a very flattering picture of the plaque
    – Yi Jiang
    Jan 18, 2011 at 4:28
  • 1
    @Yi Unfortunately, it's difficult to take a photo of a reflective surface, especially when all you have is a crappy iPhone 4 camera. It's better than nothing though. Feel free to replace with a better one! By the way, you have to go upstairs to see "the wall". There's nothing else upstairs. Nobody goes there and for some unknown reasons, I felt the staff were not exactly happy about us going there. In fact, after I came down, they put a barrier ribbon to prevent people from going there. I was a bit uncomfortable about this and just wanted to take a picture ASAP and come back.
    – mmx
    Jan 18, 2011 at 4:37
  • @mehr this is awesome, thank you! I believe the museum is not fully 'done' with the work, the big opening is Jan 31st Jan 20, 2011 at 22:34
  • @Jeff You're welcome. Thank you for putting it there! I didn't know about the "big opening." Everywhere I saw, they mentioned last week as opening. I would've gone on the 31st if I knew it :(
    – mmx
    Jan 21, 2011 at 5:35
  • 1
    Now can we have the closed as dupe brick?
    – bananakata
    Mar 7, 2011 at 15:30
180
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com 
2
3  closed as exact
4    duplicate of
5  brick #13379001
6
18
  • 12
    +1 You'd need two bricks, then. Apr 17, 2010 at 1:39
  • 12
    Precisely. The second brick would redirect to the first, of course. Apr 17, 2010 at 3:23
  • 69
    @Julian H. Lam: Nope, the second brick has been moved to meta. Apr 17, 2010 at 3:26
  • 1
    First one to make my LOL! Apr 17, 2010 at 7:06
  • 31
    Isn't it sad you think of closing questions when you think of SO? Apr 17, 2010 at 7:26
  • 16
    I think it's great that there is so much knowledge on the SO-family that 50% of questions can be closed as duplicates.
    – Gnoupi
    Apr 17, 2010 at 9:53
  • 12
    @Gnoupi that statement tells me the real issue is question discoverability. Apr 17, 2010 at 15:43
  • 3
    To discover, you have bring up the effort to search first, though.
    – mafu
    Apr 18, 2010 at 1:06
  • 3
    @ongle: Discoverability is sometimes an issue, but at least as often it seems to be users who [don't know how|are unwilling] to search. First time is free, of course, but after that folks should take some responsibility. Apr 18, 2010 at 2:22
  • 1
    Way to hijack an answer's comment thread by discussing totally off-topic usability issues :-P
    – Andy E
    Apr 19, 2010 at 9:26
  • 6
    @Andy I will require (pinky in mouth) 1 Million Dollars before I will return your comment thread. Apr 19, 2010 at 15:58
  • what is 9001?
    – Lazer
    Apr 22, 2010 at 18:50
  • 1
    @eSKAy: IT'S OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAAND! Apr 22, 2010 at 20:04
  • 1
    @eSKay: The power level, of course Apr 24, 2010 at 16:58
  • 1
    @eSKay: youtube.com/watch?v=SiMHTK15Pik May 1, 2010 at 20:32
121
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com
2 
3 How do I move the
4  turtle in LOGO? 
5 
6 
6
  • 24
    this is GENIUS! Apr 17, 2010 at 3:00
  • 12
    How do I move the brick in MUSEUM?
    – Earlz
    Apr 17, 2010 at 3:46
  • That is the question. Apr 17, 2010 at 4:50
  • 10
    Seems a bit narcissistic to me.
    – raven
    Apr 17, 2010 at 20:04
  • 19
    @raven - As opposed to buying a $5000 brick to commemorate yourself, which is totally humble. Apr 23, 2010 at 18:35
  • @Length The brick is to commemorate the community, not any particular person.
    – Sampson
    Apr 27, 2010 at 4:45
118
  123456789012345678
1 See:
2 http://meta.
3  stackoverflow
4   .com/
5    questions/46920 
6 for brick history
9
  • 4
    I just love this one! Apr 17, 2010 at 8:43
  • 8
    I'm not too excited about this one - the link is only valid for so long. Apr 21, 2010 at 4:23
  • Absolutely brilliant. Apr 21, 2010 at 20:56
  • 4
    @George, what is going to happen to the link? Surely Jeff is doing backups...
    – metacoder
    May 3, 2010 at 1:57
  • What if the backups fail? May 3, 2010 at 3:59
  • 7
    @George: What if the museum collapses? What if Atlantis rises from the ocean tomorrow and marauding merpeople reduce us to the stone age again? Gotta draw the line somewhere....
    – Pops
    May 4, 2010 at 18:03
  • 1
    @Pop: I'm just saying... what happens 50 years from now when people come to the museum? The joke will mean nothing if the URL is invalid. Who knows if the Internet will even exist? May 4, 2010 at 18:35
  • 9
    @George: I have come from the future to find out what these URLs that you refer to are. We find them in some archeological artifacts that we have dated to approximately this period. May 8, 2010 at 1:17
  • @DennisWilliamson: Good one ;)
    – citronas
    Mar 7, 2011 at 19:54
109
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com
2  \ji
3  /.((( 
4 (,/"(((__,--.
5    \  ) _( /{ 
6    !|| " :||      
6
  • 2
    +1 "My Little Pony, My Little Pony; What does the future hold?" Apr 17, 2010 at 21:48
  • @waiwia Oh! I was wondering why if the SO logo had gotten a little tipsy or something... Apr 19, 2010 at 0:55
  • They would engrave it in non-monospace font. :) Apr 19, 2010 at 10:04
  • OMG, Unicorn(s)! Oh wait, that's what my name is stuck at over on SO, but not here.
    – Powerlord
    Apr 20, 2010 at 14:15
  • This is my favourite, but I don't think the font on the brick will do justice to this masterpiece :-) Oct 15, 2010 at 0:53
  • 1
    It looks like a poodle wearing a unicorn mask. (" = eyes) Aug 17, 2012 at 9:43
103

Kicking things off with my dumb suggestion.

Remember the brick is 6 lines of 18 characters!

  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com
2 our VC asked us to
3 build a business 
4 but we spent all 
5 their money on
6 this brick instead
6
  • 7
    If you go this route, why stop with just 1 brick?
    – Jon Seigel
    Apr 16, 2010 at 23:55
  • 29
    @jon that would be funnier -- a whole wall, 1 letter per brick, heh. Apr 16, 2010 at 23:58
  • 6
    Can I buy the one under yours and put "that is one expensive brick!"?
    – juan
    Apr 17, 2010 at 0:18
  • 2
    If you write it this way, you can avoid the hyphenated busin-ess: | StackOverflow.com | Our VC asked us to | build a business, | but we spent | all their money on | this brick. | Apr 17, 2010 at 3:03
  • @robert excellent, I reformatted it per your suggestion Apr 17, 2010 at 3:12
  • 4
    7 -- Burma Shave. Mar 7, 2011 at 16:38
78
  123456789012345678
1 to ask questions 
2 is human, 
3 but 
4 to provide
5 expert answers is
6 stackoverflow.com
11
  • 1
    For some reason reminds me of a slightly less sinister version of the motto from The Prisoner: i41.tinypic.com/b6udzk.png
    – sblair
    Apr 17, 2010 at 2:07
  • 3
    I resent this one. Stop excluding us 'free rider'-'question-askers'-'only 5 rep per upvote' users!
    – ripper234
    Apr 17, 2010 at 5:34
  • Nice!!!!!!!!!!! Apr 17, 2010 at 7:02
  • 1
    Consider a version of this except with "to provide expert answers." Apr 17, 2010 at 17:59
  • @ripper I took robert's advice and amended free to expert Apr 17, 2010 at 20:49
  • 4
    I think it would be better without the "but". Like: "To ask questions/is human./To provide/expert answers is/stackoverflow.com". (And one line to spare.)
    – Arjan
    Apr 17, 2010 at 21:33
  • @Arjan, but that completely screws up the cool way the text currently looks :)
    – Earlz
    Apr 17, 2010 at 22:48
  • @Earlz, given the official examples I wouldn't rely on the looks... (And I'm not natively English, but the but actually seems wrong to me. Maybe and is better?)
    – Arjan
    Apr 17, 2010 at 23:23
  • Is that an evil EE reference?
    – rlb.usa
    Apr 18, 2010 at 3:29
  • @Jeff - you misunderstood me. I was, half jokingly, protesting against exclusion of great question askers. Asking great questions should not be excluded (although yes, the purpose is the answers ... but without great questions there can't be great answers ... or at least "answers to great questions". This comment will now self-terminate).
    – ripper234
    Apr 18, 2010 at 14:58
  • 2
    a bit marketing-y
    – UpTheCreek
    Apr 22, 2010 at 10:24
70
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com:
2 The only place
3 where you can get
4 100 answers
5 for what to write
6 on this brick.
7
  • make that 38 now... Apr 17, 2010 at 4:51
  • Just to make it that much more geeky, it should be 42.
    – AnonJr
    Apr 17, 2010 at 13:44
  • 10
    I think it should be the actual final # of answers. Apr 17, 2010 at 13:51
  • 3
    That'd be a good meta brick.
    – MPelletier
    Apr 17, 2010 at 15:09
  • 29
    Are there dynamic bricks?
    – Franz
    Apr 19, 2010 at 9:46
  • 1
    The only way to get an accurate count would be to lock the question before engraving ;-) Oct 15, 2010 at 0:55
  • @RobertCartaino 99 answers so far!
    – jkd
    Jun 2, 2018 at 4:13
68
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com
2 None of us
3 Is as Dumb
4 As all of Us
5 -Jeff Atwood & 
6  Joel Spolsky

http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2008/09/stack-overflow-none-of-us-is-as-dumb-as-all-of-us.html

2
  • 43
    hmm, initially misread that as "none of us is as dumb as Jeff Atwood & Joel Spolsky"
    – Mark Heath
    Apr 22, 2010 at 9:49
  • 1
    That's already the subtitle for the 'Meetings' demotivational poster. Still funny though. I think of this everytime I'm in a meeting at work... or really anywhere for that matter.
    – Craig
    Apr 24, 2010 at 18:45
56

Poetized version of Atwood's earlier answer.

Answered questions quick
VCs made wallets thick
Won some cash to kick some ass
But spent it on this brick.

  123456789012345678
1 Answered questions
2 quick, VCs made
3 wallets thick, Won
4 some cash to kick
5 some ass but spent
6 it on this brick

alt text
(source: sampsonresume.com)

4
  • 3
    Yo! The Beastie Boys are in the house! Apr 17, 2010 at 1:31
  • 7
    it has no meter. rhythm fail. Apr 17, 2010 at 9:00
  • 9
    Sounds like it rhymes pretty well to me - perhaps it's the char-per-line restriction that is making it difficult to read?
    – Sampson
    Apr 17, 2010 at 13:14
  • "rhythm" != "rhyme". but yeah, splitting the lines differently helps. Apr 20, 2010 at 3:19
45
  123456789012345678
1 Programming Q&A?
2 StackOverflow.com
3 has both.
4 -- Answered 2009
5 community briki
6 Jeff Atwood
3
  • 8
    I confess. I only posted this to get the community briki joke in. Apr 17, 2010 at 3:42
  • 20
    well, I LOL'ed so mission accomplished. COMMUNITY BRIKI! Apr 17, 2010 at 3:49
  • 7
    I confess. I only upvoted this because the community briki joke was in.
    – Pops
    May 4, 2010 at 18:05
41
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com
2 Asking 14-million
3 expert programmers
4 what to write
5 on this brick.
6 [status-completed]

Of course, we'll need the actual # of users.

7
  • @Robert the tag is [status-completed] (which fits in 18 characters) not [status-complete] Apr 17, 2010 at 16:30
  • fixed (and here's the filler to meet minimum comment size requirements). Apr 17, 2010 at 17:13
  • 3
    Imho the best one ever
    – P Shved
    Apr 17, 2010 at 17:37
  • 2
    Where does the figure of 14-million come from? (The most recent SO user id is 319,402.)
    – Arjan
    Apr 17, 2010 at 20:35
  • @Arjan - Made it up. Need to know the number of unique visitors to the site; way more than 319K. Apr 18, 2010 at 2:56
  • 3
    I think I should clarify why this brick is the best. It contains a reference that SO is a great and influential Q&A site. It also contains a generic joke, in addition to an inside joke; this is what many bricks here lack.
    – P Shved
    Apr 18, 2010 at 9:16
  • I really like it. We can get it, but anyone can enjoy it.
    – e-satis
    Apr 19, 2010 at 9:42
38
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com
2
3 [closed]brick
4 
5 not programming
6 related
30
 123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow() {
2   ask_questions;
3   get_answers;
4   rep++;
5   return profit;
6 }
10
  • 6
    Bill adds ()s to all of those... Apr 17, 2010 at 2:45
  • line 5 should read "return profit;"
    – doekman
    Apr 17, 2010 at 6:29
  • @doekman: Thanks for the bug report. [status-completed]. Apr 17, 2010 at 13:36
  • 3
    -1 for using a language that requires semi-colons. Apr 18, 2010 at 1:16
  • postincrement => not good
    – Vi.
    Apr 20, 2010 at 11:08
  • I think return stackoverflow() actually. Then there it will be a stack overflow (unless you've got tail recursion).
    – Skilldrick
    Apr 22, 2010 at 12:50
  • Line 5 should not be reachable. Apr 22, 2010 at 15:55
  • 1
    @Paul: Why not? I profit from the answers I receive, even if only intellectually. Besides "profit" is a meme. Apr 22, 2010 at 18:24
  • 4
    profit is undefined
    – bobobobo
    May 9, 2010 at 22:08
  • Why not return stackoverflow()? Aug 17, 2012 at 9:45
30

It really should be something in code . . . and this seems like the most obvious choice:

  123456789012345678
1 /* See:
2  StackOverflow.com
3 */
4 public int Foo() {
5     return Foo();
6 }

Because of course the logical place that someone would come to figure out what that means, or how to fix it is to visit StackOverflow.com.

6
  • 2
    That's seven lines. Apr 17, 2010 at 2:54
  • 2
    @Dennis, could just take the { up a line and reduce it to 6. This is actually a common(though not in C#) coding style
    – Earlz
    Apr 17, 2010 at 3:45
  • Just use // for the comments and you can ditch the */ line.
    – chakrit
    Apr 17, 2010 at 6:24
  • 2
    Hope the edits are ok. Return type changed to int so I could fit a { and a space. Most importantly, it now fits the spec Apr 18, 2010 at 1:05
  • Thanks. That works. I changed the comments and didn't realize I added a line. Apr 20, 2010 at 4:28
  • 1
    How can we be certain this won't get TCO'd to just loop forever?
    – SamB
    Feb 25, 2012 at 20:13
25
  123456789012345678
1 ___|_____|_____|__
2 |_____|_____|_____
3 ___|_____|_____|__
4 |_____|_____|_____
5 ___|_____|_____|__
6 |_____|_____|_____

It's just another brick in the wall.

4
  • 1
    Nice, but you know some do better. ;-)
    – Arjan
    Apr 20, 2010 at 19:28
  • 2
    @Arjan: tell Jeff to get us kbd back, and I'll try.
    – perbert
    Apr 20, 2010 at 19:58
  • You didn't seem to need kbd to restore that image after Jeff took kbd away!
    – Arjan
    Apr 20, 2010 at 20:38
  • +1 for the Pink Floyd reference
    – Shoe
    Feb 28, 2011 at 17:03
24
  123456789012345678
1 StackOverflow.com
2 Dedicated to the
3 tireless effort of
4 expert programmers
5 making this brick
6 [status-complete]
3
  • 5
    I like this because it's true to the "dedication" nature of the brick, plus contains a bit of the SO purpose and an inside-meme, to boot. Apr 17, 2010 at 18:03
  • 1
    By all my powers I have just made up, I hereby pronounce you the best brickmaker ever.
    – P Shved
    Apr 21, 2010 at 19:10
  • 1
    This is nice - punny, on-message, in-jokey, and awesome. Apr 22, 2010 at 0:09
23
First brick here?
Check out the FAQ!
1
  • sigh.... brick.
    – Earlz
    Apr 17, 2010 at 7:51
22

I prefer a more nuanced message:

  123456789012345678
1 Add 2 parts Q & A,
2 1 part Wiki,
3 1 part forum.
4 Bake for 6-8 weeks
5 Makes 3-4 servings
6 stackoverflow.com
6
  • 5
    -1 forgot to mention waffles Apr 17, 2010 at 4:51
  • @George: Clearly I'm not spending enough time on meta (for the uninitiated: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19392/…). Apr 17, 2010 at 5:01
  • @mike what about s/1 part forum/1 part Waffles ?
    – Earlz
    Apr 17, 2010 at 22:45
  • @Earlz: My other answer has waffles and got no love. I blame John Cusack :( Apr 18, 2010 at 2:28
  • WHERE'S THE PONY?
    – ariefbayu
    Apr 19, 2010 at 9:54
  • where do I see 6-8 weeks joke? Apr 28, 2010 at 15:26
21
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow\.com
2.you shouldn't par\
3.se [X]HTML with re
4.gular expressions.
5.have you tried HT\
6.ML Parser instead?
1
  • 4
    haha, I always hate it when people rain on my cthulu parade!
    – travis
    Apr 19, 2010 at 15:30
20
  123456789012345678
1        \   |
2      __  \  |
3        --_ \ |
4    | ______ |
5    |________|
6 stackoverflow.com
4
  • beat you by 25 seconds :-P Apr 17, 2010 at 0:12
  • I think it's unlikely the brick will use a monospace font, though, which means alignment would be problematic Apr 17, 2010 at 0:48
  • 9
    and the bricks have logos anyway Apr 17, 2010 at 3:48
  • 4
    Any one have any pictures of actual bricks?
    – dwj
    Apr 18, 2010 at 19:51
18


  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com
2
3   eventually
4  we'd like to
5     be an
6    exhibit
17
if you're looking        
for gender reass-      
ignment, you've          
come to the wrong
place 
 stackoverflow.com
1
  • 29
    +1 But I'm sure the history books will have long forgotten the hyphen-site, making this one confusing brick :)
    – Sampson
    Apr 17, 2010 at 0:49
17
  123456789012345678
1  
2 
3 (λx.x x) (λx.x x)
4 stackoverflow.com
5 
6 
2
  • 2
    omega, my mega. Apr 18, 2010 at 3:25
  • SO - lambda style :)
    – Yuval A
    Apr 23, 2010 at 18:08
15

How about:

  123456789012345678
1
2            Alconja
3              3,772
4          ●1 ●3 ●16
5  
6 stackoverflow.com

Ok, maybe I'm not well known enough... so perhaps:

  123456789012345678
1
2          Jon Skeet
3            168,276
4     ●31 ●593 ●1153
5
6 stackoverflow.com

Or:

  123456789012345678
1
2      Jeff Atwood ♦
3             58,226
4       ●9 ●110 ●190
5
6 stackoverflow.com
3
  • I would use some |s and -s and such to put a "border" around it. Maybe that would look weird.
    – Tyler
    Apr 17, 2010 at 3:51
  • @MatrixFrog: Yeah I was going to, except Jeff mentioned that it probably wouldn't be a fixed width font, which would make it come out weird.
    – Alconja
    Apr 17, 2010 at 9:01
  • 51
    Let Jon buy his own brick!
    – C. Ross
    Apr 18, 2010 at 12:05
15
  123456789012345678
1 The only community
2 on the internet
3 where users enjoy
4 when avatars are
5 hacked and turned
6 into unicorns.
1
  • 2
    Without the hyphen the word community just fits fine on that first line, right?
    – Arjan
    Apr 17, 2010 at 12:17
14
  123456789012345678
1 stackoverflow.com
2  
3 Fixing the
4 internet
5 one question
6 at a time
13

The solution is obvious. You need to buy many bricks, and set them up with graphics of the game breakout.

13

Not to rain in your parade, but this is the kind of neighbours you'd have?

3
  • 22
    I'm really hoping these "examples" aren't representative. We're in the high-rent neighborhood.. Apr 17, 2010 at 2:59
  • 1
    @Jeff: that reminds me... who is paying for this? :) Apr 17, 2010 at 4:51
  • 6
    If someone pays $5k for one of these I'll send them my address so they can send to balance of their excess to me.
    – squillman
    Apr 17, 2010 at 13:15
11
010100110111010001
100001011000110110
101101001111011101
100110010101110010
011001100110110001
10111101110111 
3
  • 4
    I'd prefer it in mixed case or all lower case instead of all caps. Apr 17, 2010 at 0:39
  • Just for you, Dennis... Apr 17, 2010 at 0:42
  • 18
    -1, a lot of bricks will be like that, methinks.
    – MPelletier
    Apr 17, 2010 at 17:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .