Looking at the community user for SO you can see there are a lot of votes. Surely some of those hit the rep cap etc etc. Is it possible that someone could calculate the community user's actual reputation?
closed as not constructive by kiamlaluno, hims056, animuson♦, Toon Krijthe, Martijn Pieters Dec 12 '12 at 11:53
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
The community user doesn't own any content to vote on. The only thing that could affect its reputation are the downvotes it owns, but even then the system is designed to not allow the reputation of any user to go below 1.
Here on Meta, Community owns 2 questions (on moderator elections), https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/111310/november-2011-community-moderator-election and https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/134509/june-2012-community-moderator-election.
They're not community wiki, so Community "should" be earning reputation from them. (These two are its only rep-earning posts on the entire network.) As of this writing, the posts' scores are (+21 -1) and (+37 -1). Since
37 * 5 < 200, and the posts were months apart, Community did not hit the rep cap. Therefore, it earned
(21 + 37) * 5 - 2 * 2 = 286 reputation.
To calculate Community's overall deserved reputation, considering reputation it spent on downvotes, we must make some assumptions. Its voting record is:
50,847 up 16,368 question 6,595 down 41,074 answer
Assume that its fraction of downvotes (6595 / (6595 + 50847) ≈ 0.1148114619964486) is the same between its votes on questions and answers. Then it has given about (0.1148114619964486 * 41074 ≈ 4715.766) answer downvotes, each of which costs 1 reputation.
It also owns anonymous suggested edits. Suppose it has already had at least 500 approved suggestions. Reputation from suggested edits are capped at 1000.
Therefore, its estimated overall score is about
1 (initial reputation) + 286 (from upvoted posts) + 1000 (approved suggestions) - 4715.766 (spent downvoting)
Since its "real" reputation is negative, there's no surprise that its reputation shows up as the minimum (1).