The question this relates to: Should we permit undeleting questions against the author’s will?
(Original title) A crime worthy of defrocking? Should we permit adversely reopening questions against the author's will?
This happens more often on meta than on SO, but I've seen it happen on both. Valid questions are being downvoted and buried because the OP is being obstinate, rude, or in some important manner problematic.
In that case the person who was asking the question chose to ask it in a manner which was not constructive and was more accusatory than productive. But the question is still important and worthy of discussion.
Basically, the root question had almost no chance of overcoming the pre-existing perceptions of the OP (which the OP did nothing to change).
What is the course of action here? I attempted to edit the title, but it was already at -8 at that point, and the wording of the question itself was inextricably steeped in the OPs particular oratorical style.
If I ask it again, it would (and should) be closed as a duplicate. Unless the OP votes to delete that question, which, if you're familiar with the topic at hand, would actually be pretty funny.
Related: Perfectly Valid Questions with bad wording and people jumping on them