One can use https://chart.googleapis.com/chart?cht=tx&chl= + LaTeX formula as URL for an image to display formulae, e.g. https://chart.googleapis.com/chart?cht=tx&chl=%5cint_1%5e%5cinfty%5cfrac%7b1%7d%7bx%5e2%7d%5c%2cdx%3d1this (credit goes to Vortico for his comment on the Physics proposal at area51). It might be nice to add a separate button to the markdown editor or, even better, auto-expand $LATEX$ to https://chart.googleapis.com/chart?cht=tx&chl=LATEX https://chart.googleapis.com/chart?cht=tx&chl=LATEX

edit Since google's TeX really looks ugly compared to alternatives stated in some answers (thanks to all who mentioned this) another API might be better suited

5 Answers 5


An alternative to the Google Chart API and server-generated LaTeX images is the MathJax JavaScript library (pointed out by Nickoneill on Area51). The project is quite active and claims to release a stable version soon. Its function could be though of as a LaTeX to MathML converter, and many formats of TeX fonts are included, so its browser support is very good.

The MathJax project site claims the implementation is similar to the jsMath library.

  • MathJax is currently written by the very same maintainer of the jsMath library, so certain parts of the codebase have been around for longer than it appears.
    – Nick
    Commented Jun 23, 2010 at 21:38
  • Since those SE sites with LaTeX enabled (e.g. math.stackexchange.com, physics.stackexchange.com) use MathJax, I re-accept this answer Commented Mar 14, 2013 at 8:37

Actually the Google Chart API produces ugly equations. I don't know what they have done to the TeX setup to produce such bad results. Compare:

Of course we also need to ensure a valid term of use, e.g. CodeCogs only permit 3,000 equations for free. Ideally one should setup a LaTeX rendering engine on sstatic.net, then we don't need external services.

Edit: I've found another LaTeX rendering service (note - no longer avaliale) which is more flexible and is in "public domain".

  • thanks a lot for this comparison, you're definitely right about the other APIs looking better Commented Jul 26, 2010 at 7:09
  • @angussidney there's no need to change outgoing text links to HTTPS, especially dead links and links that don't support HTTPS
    – Cai
    Commented Mar 11, 2017 at 8:16
  • @Cai I was going through the http image review queue and simply changed all links to HTTPS (they all support it) and noted the links which no longer work, in future I will avoid touching links at all. Commented Mar 11, 2017 at 8:29
  • The link you changed here doesn't support HTTPS
    – Cai
    Commented Mar 11, 2017 at 8:33

Here is the documentation of the Google TeX API: http://code.google.com/apis/chart/docs/gallery/formulas.html

To implement this feature, I would suggest adding a button to the editor toolbar that will open a text box for the user to enter LaTeX markup. A sidebar including LaTeX elements may be added to quickly "type out" symbols such as \sum, \int, \infty, Greek letters, and matrix templates. I believe a preview button would also be necessary in order for users to guarantee that their equation is error-free. Finally, once the question/answer with LaTeX is posted, a user should be able to hover or click the equation and view the markup used, preferably in a JavaScript floating bubble. An example of this would be the Download button on Panic Coda's website.

On the technical side of the LaTeX feature, the JavaScript would need to URL encode all special characters (especially spaces and addition signs) before appending it to the API link. Also, PNG transparency could be included by adding the following tag. chf=bg,s,FFFFFF00


Math Overflow already does this, although they use jsMath. It might be useful, but how often do people type formulas on SO? Especially formulas complicated enough that LaTeX would make them easier to read?

Edit: Oh, is this for Area 51? You probably want to add that tag if so

  • Users who haven't got the jsMath fonts installed sometimes have problems visiting sites using it, up to browser lock-ups Commented Jun 12, 2010 at 22:26
  • What? You don't read latex as if it were typeset? Commented Jun 14, 2010 at 2:43
  • jsMath seems a little unstable to me. It may or may not work for different browsers and operating systems, and it's quite heavy on the JS code. Simple image tags would be the way to go.
    – Vortico
    Commented Jun 14, 2010 at 22:39
  • @dmckee: Nope. Much of the text rendered using jsMath is actually HTML and system fonts. Only the irregular symbols (ie. integrals, matrices) are images. In fact, LaTeX does not come into play at all with the JavaScript library. This is why it is not ideal IMO.
    – Vortico
    Commented Jun 15, 2010 at 5:01

A workaround is John Gietzen's greasemonky script, see here.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .