This question already has an answer here:

Suppose you come across a community wiki answer and feel you have something to expand/change/correct. What is the accepted etiquette for editing community wiki answers? Is there a strong sense of "ownership", or are we free to "make like a wiki"?

marked as duplicate by CRABOLO, Infinite Recursion, Braiam, rene, Aziz Shaikh Jan 8 '15 at 9:54

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.



This is exactly the initial objective of the Community Wiki.

There is a lesser sense of ownership, the initial poster's name signature disappears, replaced by the name of the person who contributed the most, and showing the percentage of contributed. Also, users with 100+ reputation will be able to edit them without having to go through the peer-review system.

It is really made for everyone to contribute and keep the post updated, so yes, you should feel free to add what you want, as long as it helps making it a better answer/question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .