This is partly related to Remove the 25% requirement from the “Unsung Hero” gold badge question.

I ran some queries on odata for my work on Stack Overflow, and I have found that my statistics are the following ones:

Accepted answers: 148
Zero score accepted answers: 36
Percentage of total: 24,3%

I probably fit the idea of the Unsong hero badge, as I've mostly been active in questions, from when it only had around 200 Questions until now.

To get the badge I could either try to get one of my accepted answers downvoted once, that would give me a 25% accept rate; I could also delete 4 of my accepted answers with 1 or more score. That would also give me the badge, but this just seems wrong: You are actually encouraging me to either try to get a down-vote on a good answer, or delete good answers.

So, should I delete good answers to receive a gold badge?

It's not that I care much if I get a badge or not, it's only a badge after all and not why I spend time on Stackoverflow anyways. But it's not ideal [read: problem] that I'm encouraged to delete accepted answers or try to get downvotes to achieve a badge.

  • 7
    Maybe yo should stop thinking about it. If you get it, nice, if you don't get it: so what? – Ladybug Killer Jul 15 '10 at 14:04
  • 7
    I don't think you can delete accepted answers. – xmm0 Jul 15 '10 at 14:07
  • 12
    You are truly an unsung hero! Now ... quit worrying about it :) – Tim Post Jul 15 '10 at 14:11
  • 5
    I could upvote some of your zero score answers? – devinb Jul 15 '10 at 15:06
  • 19
    The percentage is definitely a bad idea, hope they fix it someday. – Lance Roberts Jul 15 '10 at 15:22
  • 3
    Want me to downvote one of your answers? (Of course, that'll put me a bit farther from the Electorate badge, which is why I haven't been upvoting many answers.) – David Thornley Jul 15 '10 at 19:34
  • 3
    I didn't think this would get much attention, I was even serial upvoted on my accepted answers with 0 votes, thanx I guess... :) – googletorp Jul 15 '10 at 21:19
  • So, the "Unsung hero" badge is in other words nothing perfect, do I understood it well? It was invented just as a booby prize, am I right? So it is a kind of prize that shouldn't be chased, because making yourself 'unsung hero' is nothing much positive. Am I right? – Tomas Aug 9 '11 at 15:58
  • Badges should be given for some achievements, but not accidentally. I mean, if want to get some badge, I should be able to make some concrete steps for it. If I need more zero score accepted answers - I should give more answers, some of them would be zero-score answers. Please remove percentage. It's really frustrates. – Andrei Jan 17 '14 at 22:13

The whole idea of badges is that you gain them naturally for everyday use of the site. Of course, realistically everyone puts a little bit of extra effort in if they're close to gaining a particular badge.

The Staff replies in the question for removing the % requirement indicated that they're quite convinced this badge is awarded fairly, so doing anything other than what you usually do on the site should be considered "gaming" the badge. For instance, if you delete answers when they get an upvote before they get accepted, you're gaming the badge. FYI: you can't delete an accepted answer.

If you don't get the badge naturally, then you're not really an Unsung Hero, no matter how close you were to gaining the badge before you decided to make the extra push. Just like registering a sock puppet, gaining 15 rep and upvoting to gain the nice answer badge is wrong.

| improve this answer | |
  • 8
    This "whole idea" fails miserably when doing natural things in everyday use of the site pushes somebody away from a badge. The Staff may be convinced that the Unsung Hero badge is fair, but others of us may not be, and gaming the badge might make the argument against these stupid percentages more convincing. – David Thornley Jul 15 '10 at 19:34
  • 1
    @David Thornley: I made no bones about the fact that I'm against the current implementation of the badge - I think it rewards "young" members more than it does heroes. But several of the team have made it clear that the badge's current requirements are here to stay, and a few people gaming the badge won't change that any more than those gaming other badges. – Andy E Jul 15 '10 at 19:44
  • "everyone puts a little bit of extra effort in if they're close to gaining a particular badge" This blanket statement, like most of them, is not true. I would actually bet that the majority are like me and ignore badges unless we get some kind of notification about earning one, at which point you are like "cool" for a couple of seconds before forgetting about them again. – kekekela Aug 9 '11 at 20:43

The authors of the badge will probably suggest that you should concentrate exclusively on the drupal tagged questions. If you bump into other questions on popular topics, you are not encouraged to answer those:

"because there are more than enough folks already answering the popular stuff!"

"For many people to actively try and attain the badge now we'd have to concentrate solely on answering obscure questions." which is EXACTLY THE INTENT OF THE BADGE. QED

(Quoting @Jeff Atwood's comments)

In my opinion, the behaviour that this badge encourages is partially flawed. It's not sour grapes. We just want to make SO more awesome.

| improve this answer | |

Don't delete good answers.

You could add a few answers with a short comment not to upvote for a week or so. Once you got the badge just remove the comment.

| improve this answer | |
  • 9
    Asking people not to do something on Stack Overflow almost always encourages some to do it, so this will probably not work. – Andy E Jul 15 '10 at 15:02
  • @Andy From my experience this is not true. But maybe it is different for you, so no idea :) – mafu Jul 16 '10 at 8:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .