Possible Duplicate:
Should ‘hidden features of X’ be removed/closed/locked?

Why Hidden features of Python has been closed and ...

  1. Hidden Features of JavaScript

  2. Hidden Features of HTML

  3. Hidden features of Perl?

  4. Hidden features of Ruby

  5. many others ....

    are still open?

  • 2
    should be moved to meta.stackoverflow.com or this will get closed too :) – Anurag Uniyal Jul 18 '10 at 17:35
  • 1
    Don't comment on migration requests, flag instead. – badp Jul 18 '10 at 17:36
  • also see meta.stackexchange.com/questions/57561/… – Anurag Uniyal Jul 18 '10 at 17:36
  • don't flag, move! – Anurag Uniyal Jul 18 '10 at 17:37
  • 1
    Exact duplicate: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/57363/…, meta.stackexchange.com/questions/56669/…. Also don't sweat it; the question will be reopened soon. – mobrule Jul 18 '10 at 17:40
  • 5
    By the way, that's the worst possible argument you could make to have the question reopened... – badp Jul 18 '10 at 17:47
  • Because Pythons are Sneaky and dangerous! – Pekka Jul 18 '10 at 18:22
  • 7
    I'm not bothered half as much by all the hidden features questions as I am by all the whining that accompanies them. Whining that they should be closed, whining that they should be reopened, whining that some were closed when others weren't, whining that SO is being destroyed by people who post hidden features questions, whining that SO is being destroyed by people who close hidden features questions; it's getting ridiculous. We should just take a vote on whether or not these questions are OK, and enforce that across the whole site – Michael Mrozek Jul 18 '10 at 19:47

Because we haven't closed, and persuaded diamonds to lock, all of those yet. We're trying.

| improve this answer | |