19

Now that all SE sites have their own meta site, why doesn't Stack Apps have a meta?

Sure, Stack Apps is somewhat of a limited site (or rather, a site about a limited subject), so by some counts, it might not need a meta. However, I think there are some things that could be discussed about how Stack Apps should be run and there is no good place to do that now. Thus, I support the creation of a Stack Apps meta.

Improve this question

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
5

I think Stack Apps is a small and focused enough community it can support the handful of meta traffic it will need, on the site itself.

Improve this answer
3
  • 8
    What StackApps needs is moderators.
    – uɐɯsO uɐɥʇɐN
    Aug 8, 2010 at 2:53
  • 3
    If any Stack Apps meta questions appear here on meta.so should they be migrated to stackapps?
    – hippietrail
    Oct 21, 2012 at 10:08
  • 5
    Okay, so that was almost 7 years ago. Does Stackapps still not need a meta?
    – SQB
    May 24, 2017 at 9:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .