39

There are currently a few year tags that should be removed (unless the year or number itself is an issue), probably added because of versioning.

Years:

  • -> Done by jjnguy
  • -> Done by KennyTM
  • -> Boom, no more!
  • -> Has popped up at least once on 2012-01-20
  • -> Done by jjnguy
  • -> Done (and done again 07/21/2011, it came back...)

Dangling version:

Many of these are just [product]-[year] without the hyphen or [product][year]. In the 2010 category, Visual Studio 2010 and Sharepoint 2010 seem prevalent.

Ultimately, can we add a ban on these tags?

SUPPLEMENTAL:

Other dangling tags (be careful, as some may be genuinely intended):

32
  • 2
    See this question, and specifically my answer.
    – Jon Seigel
    Aug 27, 2010 at 17:01
  • 1
    It seems that some of the [2007] and [2003] tags are for Office product questions that have been moved, and can't be retagged.
    – Yi Jiang
    Aug 27, 2010 at 17:05
  • 1
    @YiJiang: I went through and deleted any that were closed and couldn't be retagged. Aug 27, 2010 at 17:10
  • 2
    Retagged a bunch...but then I got bored...
    – jjnguy
    Aug 27, 2010 at 17:15
  • 1
    @Mpel, nope, that is not a thing.
    – jjnguy
    Aug 27, 2010 at 17:33
  • 2
    ...And then I got even more bored at work, and went back to tagging...
    – jjnguy
    Aug 27, 2010 at 17:39
  • 1
    @MPelletier Its jjnguy giggle This almost feels like an inside joke now
    – Yi Jiang
    Aug 27, 2010 at 17:48
  • 2
    I changed visual 2010 studio to visual-studio-2010 I made sure it had the sponsor logo on it.
    – jjnguy
    Aug 27, 2010 at 17:52
  • 1
    People 'pronounce' it jinguy which is ok. Otherwise I have no idea how to say it. (but I like to keep it jjnguy because those are my initials (jjn))
    – jjnguy
    Aug 27, 2010 at 17:54
  • 1
    88 questions marked 2.0.. needs cleaning up Aug 27, 2010 at 20:59
  • 1
    2.0 is down to 55.. this is exhausting and slow. Aug 27, 2010 at 21:22
  • 2
    Just cleared the last two [2007]s.
    – mmyers
    Aug 27, 2010 at 22:39
  • 2
    2.0 is done! On to others... Aug 28, 2010 at 0:15
  • 1
    Tag 4.0 recleared. Jun 5, 2011 at 17:58
  • 1
    Added unit+testing to the list, as I've just eliminated [unit] and don't want it to sneak back again.
    – razlebe
    Dec 8, 2011 at 12:39

1 Answer 1

6

In addition, I found the following:

7bit       5 tags
8bit       8 tags
16bit     26 tags 
24-bit     8 tags
32bit    209 tags
64bit    887 tags
128-bit    7 tags

I think it should be either xxbit or xx-bit and based on the numbers, changing 24-bit to 24bit and 128-bit to 128bit looks like the most valid option. Only 15 to change. Unless there is a very good reason to leave it this way.

1
  • 1
    ok, I fixed the 24-bit and 128-bit ones. Jun 5, 2011 at 16:49

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .