This question on the Bicycles beta seems to be a bit of red flag, liability-wise:

What do you do to heal yourself more quickly after a crash?

I started a thread about my concerns in the meta.bicycles site: On or off topic: Medical advice

Has this ever come up before on other sites?


4 Answers 4


On Stack Overflow the community have generally gotten behind "Ask a doctor, not the internet" type answers and comments.

On sites relating to more physical activities the culture may be a little different, but you could start by trying "See an expert" type advice and seeing if the community goes with it.

  • 1
    I think there are sites where disallowing anything medical would really take away a big chunk from the site's question base - e.g. cycling.
    – Pekka
    Sep 15, 2010 at 3:57
  • @Pekka: In which case I imagine the community won't go for it. Any martial arts related site will be like that too. On a camping/hiking type site you would expect first aid to be a topic of some interest. This is going to have to be thrashed out where and as it comes up, but I think that suggesting a professional opinion is fair more-or-less every time. Sep 15, 2010 at 4:09
  • absolutely. I imagine most pieces of advice would contain a "You should ask a doctor about this, but..." part, which is fine
    – Pekka
    Sep 15, 2010 at 4:22

Limitation of liability

In no event shall Stack Overflow, its directors, officers, shareholders, employees or members be liable with respect to the Network or the Services for (a) any indirect, incidental, punitive, or consequential damages of any kind whatsoever; (b) damages for loss of use, profits, data, images, Subscriber Content or other intangibles; (c) damages for unauthorized use, non-performance of the Network, errors or omissions; or (d) damages related to downloading or posting Content. Stack Overflow's and the Network's collective liability under this agreement shall be limited to three hundred United States Dollars. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of incidental or consequential damages, so the above limitations and exclusions may not apply to Subscriber.

Part (a) seems to be applicable in this situation.

Section 9 of the Terms of Service.

  • That's good to know, but is it still a good idea to allow this sort of question? Do we want to stomp a question like this? (Crashing a bicycle is a pretty common situation.) Sep 15, 2010 at 3:08
  • @Neil Is there a good reason not to allow it? For example, is it off-topic according to the A51 example questions?
    – waiwai933
    Sep 15, 2010 at 3:10
  • Aside from potential liability issues (addressed about), I can't think of any reason. The community isn't really weighing in on this, which is another problem entirely. Sep 15, 2010 at 19:50

Wikipedia has a medical disclaimer that gets linked to from every page.

Maybe these could be adopted, and shown a bit more prominently e.g. if the question has a specific tag (medical, legal....)?


In general, mosts answers have side-effects; anyone who tried to come back against a StackOverflow answer with "your coding snippet failed in my production system and we've lost orders worth $LOTS_OF_CURRENCY_UNITS" would be laughed at.

Medical liability is a particularly obvious edge case, but the general defence of "you should have consulted a professional" seems sound.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .