12

Workin' on a new stackexchange site (gamedev), and my rep is starting level (thus low). I was trying to post my question, but turns out I can't create any tags that I find appropriate to the question (after I submitted once, and answered a no-spam captcha once or twice). Then it turns out that I can't post a question with no tags (second submit, and another captcha). so then I had to open up a new tab to read through the possible tags for the site, pick a really vague one just to fulfill the requirement, and submit again (third submit, third captcha). So finally after 3 submissions and 3 captchas, I've gotten my question through the tag-specific-requirements hoops.

This was an annoying procedure for me, so for a newbie I'm sure it would be disruptive.

7
  • After taking a quick look over there, "balance" is an existing tag that works well with that question: you're trying to find a value for X (or multiple values) that keeps the game balanced. "difficulty", another existing tag, is probably a bit of a stretch, but could possibly work. Commented Sep 22, 2010 at 0:06
  • 3
    And as a follow-up, how are any new tags created on a new SE site? If on registration the maximum rep one can start with is 101, then how are tags developed?
    – warren
    Commented Sep 22, 2010 at 14:23
  • 3
    @warren: I believe anyone can create tags in private beta.
    – Gnome
    Commented Sep 23, 2010 at 15:14
  • 1
    @Michael Madsen I consider myself somewhat of a power user, and I have lots of experience with Stackoverflow, superuser, etc etc. So this is me putting myself in the shoes of a new user. For me, it's annoying (primarily because of the multiple captchas). For a new user, I expect it would be a "time to leave this site" obstacle.
    – Kzqai
    Commented Sep 30, 2010 at 2:03
  • 1
    I propose that if a user has more than a certain number of rep on other Stack Exchange sites, then they can skip the low rep restrictions...
    – studiohack
    Commented Sep 30, 2010 at 2:12
  • I linked accounts, so I have 130 rep on the site. It's just that that rep doesn't solve the tag restrictions for me.
    – Kzqai
    Commented Sep 30, 2010 at 2:37
  • @Tchalvak: It was mainly intended as a suggestion to how you could improve the tags on that question. Commented Oct 1, 2010 at 18:19

6 Answers 6

10

Perhaps one part of the solution would be to be more clear on tags that won't work (e.g. highlighting them red & italic) because those tags don't exist and you also don't have enough rep to create them.

Edit: To clarify, the part of the problem this solves is: The site allows me to write tags that are new, without warning me in any way that said tags will prevent my question submission from succeeding.

3
  • 2
    For new sites (and even SO in general) this would be a neat feature. I would like to see a huge warning label though to prevent useless tags. The only disadvantage is that it does require moderation to "approve" a tag
    – TheLQ
    Commented Sep 21, 2010 at 21:07
  • 2
    How about using a crossed-out font? Commented Sep 30, 2010 at 14:23
  • Adding to this idea, if these proposed crossed-out tags were visible to higher rep users, they could be edited into existence by someone else.
    – Zan Lynx
    Commented Apr 30, 2011 at 0:31
5

I think it's backwards, there should be a relationship between how many tags there are on the system to the rep required to create.

IE, only 10 tags in the system have a low rep requirement

As it increases, increase rep requirement.

IE, 350 tags in system required 1.5k rep to create

2
  • Going by users seems to be more useful; and SO seems to need an increase about once a year.
    – Gnome
    Commented Sep 23, 2010 at 15:13
  • While that is a cool scaling, that's probably not going to solve the usability problem? The problem isn't a lack of tags on game-dev, I think. As a newbie, I shouldn't be able to create my own tags (so what if I think my question is about fish?). But that shouldn't be as much of an obstacle to a successful posting of a question as it currently is.
    – Kzqai
    Commented Sep 30, 2010 at 2:29
4

It sounds like the rep threshold for creating tags is too high for new sites.

4
  • 1
    I don't know, 150 is kinda low (on SO it takes 2000). I like (Tchalvak's other solution)[meta.stackexchange.com/questions/65203/… better.
    – TheLQ
    Commented Sep 21, 2010 at 21:08
  • 2
    It does not take 2k rep. on SO to create new tags. Commented Sep 22, 2010 at 6:36
  • It is currently 1.5k rep on SO to create new tags, increased from 250 a few months ago.
    – Gnome
    Commented Sep 23, 2010 at 15:11
  • Basically new sites should (and do) start with lower thresholds. Maybe the starting threshold is still too high. Commented Sep 30, 2010 at 14:24
2

You can add a section at the end of your post asking a high-rep user to create the tag and retag your post.

3
  • That doesn't help, because there's a requirement of at least one tag. So the catch-22 would still be an obstacle before a new user could even ask for help.
    – Kzqai
    Commented Sep 30, 2010 at 2:09
  • 2
    @Tchalvak, maybe on new sites we need a tab "please-retag" to cover that case Commented Sep 30, 2010 at 9:40
  • @Tchalvak: Place it in the C# tag. But then, do move the note asking for a retag to the top :-)
    – Andomar
    Commented Oct 3, 2010 at 11:04
1

Perhaps another part of the whole solution would be to try to make appropriate suggestions for starting tags for low rep users in the tag field.

Edit: To clarify, I meant (for low rep users) continue to show popular tags as suggestions beyond just alphabetic matches, so that they don't have to fish alphabetically in the dark.

Or alternatively could just always display some top tags in text -next- to the tag field so that resource doesn't go away the moment you start typing in the field (for unable-to-create-new-tags users only?).

1
  • 2
    indeed this already happens; note that the tag field is pre-populated with a selection from the top (n) tags as a hint Commented Sep 22, 2010 at 9:29
-1

If I were a newbie, I would just want the problem to go away. So perhaps if I submit my question without the "you must have at least one tag" requirement met, a generic, default tag of some kind should just be tacked on, instead of forcing the new user to jump through hoops?

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .