My list of Nice Answer badges contains an error. One answer is listed twice, and one of the associated dates is impossible. Screenshot:
I answered the Mathematica question just after midnight on Sep 26. The question had only been asked an hour earlier. Even if I could have earned the badge twice for the same answer, I couldn't have earned it before the question existed.
At the moment, I have four answers with score of >10. The one that's not listed is under I don't like to downvote newbies. Am I being too soft? However, it was posted in the middle of the day on Aug 2, so it can't have caused my Jun 13 badge either.
Now, I wouldn't be talking this much if I didn't have a theory. I'm 99% sure that I had another answer of score >10 a while back, on a question that got deleted. (I would appreciate a 10k user's help in confirming this; I think the OP for the question was Evan Carroll.) Here's what I think happened:
- May 28
- Got the first badge for the "minor edits answer"
- Jun 13
- Got the second badge for the now-deleted answer
- Some time between Jun 13 and Aug 2
- The question for the now-deleted answer got deleted, taking my answer with it
- Per the badge rules, my existing badge was not revoked
- Aug 2
- The "downvoting newbies answer" reached score of 10
- Per the badge rules, no new badge was awarded
- Sep 26
- Got the third badge for the "Mathematica answer"
- The code that records badge information got confused by the deleted answer's info not being available, and for some reason captured the info for the "Mathematica answer" instead
- Sep 27
- Got the fourth badge for the "LMSOTFY answer"
This may be the same bug that was reported here, but my case involves a question deletion and a somewhat different result.
EDIT:
Based on the comment — thanks @Grace Note — the now-deleted answer might actually be the cause of the May 28 badge, with everything else shuffled around more than I originally thought.
EDIT 2:
This post may or may not answer this question. May/June questions would be affected, but I'm not sure that "it will eventually fill up reasons" explains the time travel info-dupe that's happening here.