I was mulling over asking this question yesterday, because in various discussions around here, people were saying "subjective can't work on StackExchange", "it wasn't designed for that", etc. Whereas, to me, the fact that StackOverflow discourages subjective questions doesn't mean that they couldn't work elsewhere.

Now Robert Cartaino has blogged on this subject.

I wondered what the rest of the community makes of this. Can you see his 6 criteria working in practice?


Yes, I think that blog post covers the subject precisely. It gives very specific guidelines that we'll be able to use in asking, answering and closing questions. I'm glad they finally came out with such good documentation. They should link to that post from the FAQ.


Can you see his 6 criteria working in practice?

Depends on what you mean by "working". They'll get used, have no doubt. As fodder for arguments on edge-cases, they'll be wonderfully popular I'm sure!

This, in particular, I fear will be quoted too often...

Certainly experiences inform opinions, but the best subjective questions unabashedly and unashamedly prioritize sharing actual experiences over random opinions.

I get what he's saying there. Don't just ask for "Crystal Reports sucks!" - ask why, and then ask for concrete descriptions of scenarios where it's failed. But obviously if you're describing an exact scenario and asking whether a specific tool works in that scenario, it's not a terribly subjective question anymore... So what I expect to arise from this are effectively "horror stories" questions... Which conflict with the anti-GTKY stance of the final guideline.

So buckle up, folks - we're in for a wild ride...

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .