On the Stack Overflow blog, there are 3 authors that fairly regularly post: Joel, Jeff, and Robert, and a few more that post infrequently.

It would be nice to see who has written a post without scrolling to the bottom of the post. (Or incorrectly assuming, and finding out you were wrong)

  • 6
    I just had that problem, I thought that "sorry we rollbacked the domain" post was from Jeff until I finished reading it (should've guessed though, Jeff saying he's sorry... ha!).
    – juan
    Commented Oct 5, 2010 at 14:07
  • @Juan, exactly. Also, I agree with your blog comment.
    – jjnguy
    Commented Oct 5, 2010 at 14:08
  • 1
    Too bad there are no upvotes there...
    – juan
    Commented Oct 5, 2010 at 14:08
  • 1
    @Juan: too bad blog discussions are not redirected to meta (yet?) Commented Oct 5, 2010 at 14:40
  • You forgot Rule #6, @Juan: mikeweatherly.com/2009/07/… Commented Oct 5, 2010 at 15:09
  • 1
    @Toronto, that is not the reason for my request. I enjoy having a frame of reference when reading a post.
    – jjnguy
    Commented Oct 5, 2010 at 16:06
  • added a bounty because i find this super-annoying.
    – Kip
    Commented Nov 3, 2010 at 15:02
  • @Kip, did you just read the post about the Ubuntu developer summit thinking it was Jeff, but then it ended up being Robert? Because I just did.
    – jjnguy
    Commented Nov 3, 2010 at 15:14
  • @jjnguy: for me, I usually hit the word "I" and my brain throws an undeclared variable parsing exception
    – Kip
    Commented Nov 3, 2010 at 16:55
  • @Kip, instead of throwing an exception, my brain just fills in the default value 'Jeff Atwood'.
    – jjnguy
    Commented Nov 3, 2010 at 16:59

5 Answers 5


No, I don't think this is necessary.

The byline is not nearly as important as the title and content of the blog post.

If you need the byline, it is in the RSS feed metadata and in the post at the bottom, in bold.

Edit: Joel and Robert felt differently than I did on this, so I defer to the majority.

  • If the byline is really not necessary, you should remove it and write using either the third person or the editorial "we". If the posts don't make sense when written either of those ways, then the author does matter and needs to be apparent to the user.
    – Kip
    Commented Dec 16, 2010 at 21:33
  • @kip that's ridiculous. I said "not as important", I didn't say "completely unimportant". Notice how on THE VERY COMMENT YOU POSTED your name comes last. Gee, I wonder why that is.. ? Commented Dec 17, 2010 at 2:30
  • i misread "i don't think this is necessary" to mean the byline itself. in any case, there are differences between a blog and a comment. first- comment author isn't as relevant until you at-reply since it could be any of thousands of people you don't know; on the blog it is one of a handful of authors with distinct interests, responsibilities, and personalities. second- when it does matter, comments are short enough that you can almost always see the author when reading. and third- comments are generally discussing a very specific topic; the blog posts about lots of SO-related topics
    – Kip
    Commented Dec 17, 2010 at 14:53
  • Thanks. I appreciate the second look at it. I know that you don't think the author is super important, and I think it would be ok (or better) to make the author's name font smaller.
    – jjnguy
    Commented Dec 24, 2010 at 6:22

The benefit of having the author's name at the bottom is to get you to read the article without reading it with a presupposed bias because of your feelings about the author.

That is, the blog post should work just as well as if there wasn't an author name attached to it at all: the important thing is the content of the message, not who wrote it.

  • 2
    Yeah, that's why the author's name is always printed on the last page of a book rather than on its cover. After all, why should it ever matter whether what you are going to read was written by William Shakespeare, Mark Twain or Martha Stewart‽
    – ЯegDwight
    Commented Oct 10, 2010 at 17:37
  • @RegDwight: Writing for a company blog is not the same as writing the Great American Novel. The take-away from a post on the Stack Overflow blog is the content of the blog post is the position of SOIS. It doesn't matter if its Robert Cartaino, Joel Spolsky, or Jeff Atwood: the company position doesn't change based on which employee said it.
    – user149432
    Commented Nov 4, 2010 at 7:13
  • 1
    I'm fairly certain that William Shakespeare never wrote anything that could be considered a "Great American Novel"... Nor Martha Stewart, for that matter! :-P
    – gWaldo
    Commented Nov 9, 2010 at 13:23

I was about to post about this, even made a nice screenshot, then come to find out this has already been requested! Anyway, here's the screenshot I prepared:

alt text

  • Exactly. I had this exact same experience again today.
    – jjnguy
    Commented Nov 3, 2010 at 15:15

A work around for this is to read the blog using Google Reader, that's what I do, and the author is displayed on the top.

alt text

I agree that changing it natively would benefit those that don't use this tool, but it's a decent workaround until it happens (or forever if it doesn't)


You might consider FeedDemon. It displays the author's name at the top of the post.

Edit: Nevermind. They just released a new version and they no longer display the author's name at the top, next to the title of the article. However, it is quite obvious in the article preview.

alt text

  • Google Reader does show the author at the top, but I don't read the posts in Google Reader myself
    – Kip
    Commented Nov 3, 2010 at 14:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .