I just noticed that there is no /privileges page for the per-site metas. Same for meta.superuser.com/privileges. Is this an oversight or is there a reason behind it? It seems to me that they should have their own since reputation requirements are different from the parent site.

2 Answers 2


We don't want another set of shadow world meta /privilege faqs to maintain, update, and validate for accuracy.

The parent site /privilege faqs should suffice, and the /faq on the per-site meta does cover the actual reputation values themselves.

  • Well, right now, Meta.Gaming's privileges do not appear to match Gaming's privileges... unless you're telling me I should file another bug about that. To be more specific, I have the Close option on Meta.Gaming but not Gaming.
    – Powerlord
    Oct 14, 2010 at 19:59
  • 1
    @RBemrose It's specific to Meta Gaming. I've already reported it. The other 3 live sites do not have this issue.
    – Grace Note StaffMod
    Oct 14, 2010 at 20:34

I am guessing there aren't privilege pages for the per site metas as the reputation is the same as the parent site. Therefore I would assume if you have the privilege on the parent site then you have the privilege on the meta.

  • 3
    In that case the page should redirect to the parent privileges page.
    – ChrisF Mod
    Oct 14, 2010 at 19:31
  • @ChrisF -I agree it probably should. I don't haz teh code tho :) Oct 14, 2010 at 19:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .