Badge suggestion: "Conformist" - Made an edit to ones own post that resulted in people removing their down-votes.

This is to encourage people to fix their bad posts.

Maybe require a certain number of down-votes to be reversed, but not too many or it would very hard to attain.

[Edit] Thanks for all the positive feedback.

Some people have mentioned that they don't like the name I suggested ("Conformist"), and actually I agree with that; it's just that I couldn't think of anything else at the time. I've thought a bit more about it now, so here are some alternative badge names I've come up with:

  • Adaptability
  • Eager To Please
  • Fine Tuning
  • Reconciliation

My favorite is Adaptability, but I thought I'd put up everything I'd thought of. (if nothing else, you might want more than name anyway if you want to make silver/gold versions).

[EDIT] Returning to this after a while. Editing to put the better suggestions for the name into the title.

I really like "Responsive", as suggested by Dronz, but "Quality control" was another good alternative name suggestion.

[EDIT] Resurecting this thread because I've just had another post where this happened to me. I was given a -1 for an answer I gave, and the user posted a comment why he had given it (which was actually a fairly minor point). I made an edit to the answer to correct that point, and he has subsequently removed his -1 vote.

So it does happen.

This topic is still attracting up-votes so it seems quite popular, but I haven't heard anything official as to whether the SO team are interested in implementing it or not? Any comments guys?

  • This is a great suggestion. – jjnguy Dec 3 '10 at 15:46
  • 35
    Would this require down-voters to be notified of edits so that they could review their decision? I don't usually revisit an answer I've voted on to see if anything's changed. – ChrisF Mod Dec 3 '10 at 15:59
  • 3
    good idea, but i second @ChrisF's concern. How often do people stick around long enough to remove their upvotes? – Kip Dec 3 '10 at 16:07
  • 1
    Granted that makes it a bit harder to get, but I think it would happen enough to make it acheiveable. Also, when you make an edit, the post moves back to the top of the home page, so there is some visibility of the change happening without having to actually reload it. – Spudley Dec 3 '10 at 16:12
  • 11
    @Kip Rarity isn't a bad thing. How often do people post answers worth 20+ scores onto -5 score questions? Even if difficult to attain, it still actually promotes a good behavior (editing a post to remove flaws) – Grace Note ModStaff Dec 3 '10 at 16:14
  • 9
    @ChrisF - if you comment when you downvote (I don't know if this is a habit you have or not) then the poster can @ reply to you to let you know they've changed their post in response to your down-vote/concerns. – jball Dec 3 '10 at 16:18
  • @jball - I tend to comment rather than down-voting :) However, if you search meta for posts about encouraging comments with down-votes you'll find opinion fairly evenly divided about it's merits. Some swear they don't want to comment as it avoids "revenge down-votes". Having this badge won't necessarily convince people to change their habits. – ChrisF Mod Dec 3 '10 at 16:21
  • 1
    @ChrisF: downvoters usually leave a comment to explain the reason, and the user can reply to the comment thereby notifying the downvoter. Even if this works only in 10% of cases, it's enough. – Thomas Bonini Dec 3 '10 at 16:28
  • 2
    for what it's worth, in terms of how attainable the badge would be, I was inspired to post this because it happened to me just now: I made a post, it was downvoted with a comment. I edited the post in response and replied to the comment, and the down-voter replied and removed his down-vote. So it can happen. Whether it would be common or not... I don't know. But I guess that would be the difference between whether it would be bronze, silver or gold. – Spudley Dec 3 '10 at 16:31
  • @ChrisF - fun to see that your question came up when I searched meta :) Obviously it's not a new topic for you. – jball Dec 3 '10 at 16:32
  • @Kop - I'd question the "usually" but the goal is to get improved answers. – ChrisF Mod Dec 3 '10 at 16:33
  • 2
    Not so sure about the proposed name, but +1 for the great idea! – Jon Seigel Dec 3 '10 at 17:43
  • 1
    I like this idea. I would support its creation if the higher powers wanted to add it. – Troggy Dec 3 '10 at 18:35
  • 1
    Other names... the [Self-Improvement] badge? The [Your Feedback is Important to Us] badge? The [Quality Control] badge? Maybe [Committed]? [Dedicated]? [Follow-Through]? [Good Edit]? – Pops Dec 11 '10 at 0:18
  • 4
    I like this idea, especially if it's not called "Conformist". :-) How about "Responsive"? – Dronz Dec 14 '10 at 20:35

Actually, what would be even better (from my point of view!) would be a badge for people who downvote an answer, then after it's edited, remove their downvote. That would encourage downvoters to recognise responses to their criticism.

I'm motivated about this because of a case today: i posted an answer with some code which had a bug and some questionable style; someone downvoted me and pointed it out, we had a long back-and-forth about the matter, and i fixed the problems. But he didn't remove his downvote. I thought that was a trifle inconsiderate. A badge might encourage people not to do it.

(In this particular case, there was still at least one feature of my answer he still objected to, so perhaps he has good reason to maintain the downvote. But in general, you know, etc.)

  • 7
    yes. perhaps both sides have a good case for a badge. – Spudley Apr 1 '11 at 19:35
  • Agree with @Spudley, this is a second very nice badge suggestion... But I think there's still no way for us to get notified of a modification on the downvoted post and only way to know it would be through manually tracking them as I've indicated in my answer - which sucks a lot for complying with this badge. – cregox May 27 '11 at 10:27
  • 1
    This other badge could be called "Good Critic" or "Responsive Critic". Something in those terms. :) – cregox May 27 '11 at 10:29
  • @Cawas: I agree that if you don't get notified of edits to answers (and questions) you've downvoted, this badge would be unfair, or at least unhelpful. But that would be a useful feature, so perhaps we should have it, and then have this badge. – Tom Anderson May 27 '11 at 11:10
  • Yes, that's precisely what I meant to imply, Tom. – cregox May 27 '11 at 14:44
  • There is a problem with that. Somebody can downvote a question and then wait until it is edited and then un-downvote just to get the badge. – Anish Gupta May 10 '12 at 15:00

Adding to it, I would suggest a way to keep track of down votes, at least. A natural (and already requested) later improvement would be getting notified of modifications on posts you downvoted (though I'm afraid we're quite far from having it).

edit: Thanks to DMA57361's comment on another (already mentioned) question, here's how to see your downvotes: https://meta.stackoverflow.com/reputation and using audit helper script you can see it much better! So we're really missing just the notifications in this suggestion.


It is an interesting idea, but to me feels a bit to rare to be a silver badge. I could accept it being a bronze badge.

Also it feels like it is encouraging a fairly complex workflow, that said we already have "Peer Pressure" so this badge could be an interesting complement.

  • 2
    thanks for the input. I thought rarity would make it more likely to be a silver? ("bronze is for basic use of the site; they're easy to get") – Spudley May 27 '11 at 10:14

How do you distinguish the following two scenarios:

  • User posts an earnest, but bad, answer. Gets downvote(s). Improves answer. Gets upvote(s) and badge.
  • User posts a terrible answer to attract downvotes to get this badge. Gets downvote(s). Posts a real, and genuinely useful answer. Gets upvote(s) and badge.

Improving bad answers is a good behavior that should be encouraged, but posting good answers the first time is still better. This badge would encourage initially giving lousy answers as much as it encourages improving them.

This is similar to potential problems with the peer pressure badge encouraging gaming, and Tumbleweed which is more of a consolation prize than encouraging desirable behavior.

  • Its a good question, and I can see that there is potential to game the system. But that applies to most systems of any complexity. I think in this case, gaming the system to gain badges would likely come at the expense of rep points: if you're posting bad answers deliberately to get down-votes, in the hope that they'll get reversed when you turn it into a good answer... well yes, you may win some badges, but the odds are that most down voters would not reverse their vote, so you'd be left stuck with minus scores and negative rep. I think that's a sufficient deterrent. – Spudley Jun 19 '12 at 22:15
  • The easiest way to minimize gaming is to make the badge non-repeatable. Will it still happen? Sure. But only once per user, at the most. – LessPop_MoreFizz Jun 19 '12 at 23:50
  • @LessPop_MoreFizz Agreed, but that also makes the badge less compelling. We want users to fix all their bad answers, not just do it once. – blahdiblah Jun 20 '12 at 2:36
  • @blahdiblah The point is to teach users the habit. Hopefully the up votes will be sufficient to keep them doing it. – LessPop_MoreFizz Jun 20 '12 at 2:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .