33

After some recent changes whenever I open a question the page title reads <first-question-tag>-<question title>-Stack Overflow.

Tags are often quite long - for example there's visual-studio-2008 tag on SO. If browser uses tabs the tag might occupy all the tab width and no room for actual question title is left - this makes navigating between tabs inconvenient.

  • 2
    Related (on Webmasters): webmasters.stackexchange.com/q/6556/46 – Rebecca Chernoff Dec 10 '10 at 13:11
  • +1 for idea, even tho I know why it's being done in the first place. @JeffAtwood (when you get around to this one) doesn't appending them work as well as prepending them? – jcolebrand Dec 10 '10 at 15:30
  • 1
    @drachenstern: No, tags placed earlier in the <title> have more weight (for confirmation see Rebecca's link, above) so prepending is optimal. – Robert Cartaino Dec 10 '10 at 16:19
  • @Robert ~ Are you serious? OY that SUCKS ~~~~ Guess that makes this [status-by-design] then and not likely to go away... – jcolebrand Dec 10 '10 at 16:42
  • This wouldn't be nearly as inconvenient if the default maximum tab size was about 25% larger. – Jon Seigel Dec 10 '10 at 17:48
  • 10
    IMO "not that convenient" is not strong enough. Personally I think the tag-in-title is downright annoying, and sometimes confusing. I hope it can be just a temporary change. – David Z Dec 10 '10 at 22:14
  • -1, sorry - content-scraping sites do precisely this so that they rank higher, and we have to fight fire with fire. It would be an SEO disaster to not do that. – bwDraco Dec 6 '13 at 2:29
12

Sorry, this is absolutely necessary, otherwise we get demolished by scrapers using our own content in Google ranking.

For background you can read:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1985264

And:

As for "why not at the end of the title versus at the start", see

Does the order of keywords matter in a page title?

5

For anyone not aware of the problem with this, and why this "solution" exists for the "problem" that most users familiar with SO don't know about:

Report high-Google-ranking Stack Exchange content copiers here

quoting meta (so meta, no?)

for those of you seeing scrapers rank above #stackoverflow can you reply with your exact google query terms? (plain text only, no urls) Tweeted by codinghorror on December 9, 2010 at 7:59 AM

and

What to do when you find copied SF, SU or SO content on other websites?

Why these scrapers have higher ranks than the original stackoverflow pages in Google search results?

  • The SO Clones link doesn't list SO scrapers like efreedom and comanswer, but only UI clones. – BalusC Dec 10 '10 at 17:23
  • @BalusC ~ I finally had time to update my answer. Sorry. – jcolebrand Dec 10 '10 at 19:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .