Refer to Exhibit A:


This question was migrated to programmers.stackexchange.com from StackOverflow. Note that there seems to be some confusion in the comments below the question about what should be the appropriate home for Code Golf questions.

I suspect that this particular question was migrated, at least in part, not because it is Code Golf, but because it was ultimately uninteresting to the SO community. But if that's the case, it probably should have been closed as NARQ, rather than "pawned off" on PSE.

Can we have some community clarification about this?

closed as off-topic by Wrzlprmft, Infinite Recursion, James, Werner, Monica Cellio Aug 28 '15 at 22:20

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Wrzlprmft, Infinite Recursion, James, Werner, Monica Cellio
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 5
    I still find the idea that Programmers is the destination fro code golf questions really strange. Jeff may have put it in the p.se FAQ, but it does not make any kind of sense to me. – dmckee Dec 27 '10 at 20:34
  • 1
    @dmckee - couldn't agree more. Code golf is way too code specific for PSE. I could be wrong but the only code golf question to date was one migrated from SO. – Walter Dec 28 '10 at 14:21

After some further thought, I don't think Code Golf questions belong on p.se since they are so code-focused and the primary (though by no means final) rule of thumb for whether something belongs on SO or p.se is "does it contain code, and is the question primarily about code?"

So, I removed the section on the Programmers Stack Exchange FAQ which allowed Code Golf there. Code Golf questions should stay on Stack Overflow for now (and must be flagged for moderator attention to get the cwiki flag set on them), until such time as the Area 51 Code Golf proposal gets traction.

  • 5
    It's important to have a clear definition. I personally can't see Code Golf on PSE. Code is a SO beast or another site. – Maniero Dec 28 '10 at 13:02
  • 5
    Can the explicit mention of Code Golf questions be removed from the Programmers.SE FAQ? That was added unilaterally with no input from a community that does not want them. – user149432 Dec 28 '10 at 14:12
  • 2
    as a long time follower of CG questions, I think they have utility on the Stack Overflow site because they teach you about code. Have you seen some of those Perl solutions? They don't fit nearly as well on Stack Exchange because they aren't really about the softer side of software engineering. I believe they belong on Stack Overflow, and if the code-golf tag automatically made them CW, then I'd be ok with it (providing the tag could only be used by a moderator or 20K'r, and the votes were retroactively removed). – George Stocker Dec 28 '10 at 15:08
  • just to let you know -- fragmentation is going to kill SO. – MK01 Jan 11 '11 at 21:55
  • @Popular Demand: Well, Robert's request was, "Can we have some community clarification about this?" Rejected implies that Robert had a request which was then denied. – Brian Jan 11 '11 at 22:44

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .