7

This question seems to have two accepted answers - @Felix's was accepted on January 1, 2001.

Is this a known bug? It doesn't seem a duplicate of this bug, which has its roots in a race condition.

7
  • 1
    I was originally going to link some earlier reports like this, but this is something completely different. For the record, that timestamp is the same as what happens when a deleted user has acceptance, in case that points anything out. The timeline shows the answer as unaccepted, so something must've glitched to keep it still labeled as such.
    – Grace Note StaffMod
    Jan 26, 2011 at 20:31
  • 1
    Another case popped up just a few hours before you asked this question: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/53096/…
    – Pops
    Jan 26, 2011 at 20:37
  • @Pop good catch. Must be related to some recent change
    – Pekka
    Jan 26, 2011 at 20:40
  • 1
    Roots in a race condition? The time difference is 22 seconds, I wouldn't expect the SO hardware to be that slow.
    – user138231
    Jan 26, 2011 at 20:45
  • @BalusC ah, it was just Pollyanna's suspicion, not official word. I misread.
    – Pekka
    Jan 26, 2011 at 20:47
  • @Jeff status-completed, but how?
    – user1228
    Feb 7, 2011 at 15:31
  • 1
    @will sql is a hell of a drug Feb 8, 2011 at 5:29

2 Answers 2

1

Seen this on SO (lost the link immediately). Could be an issue with a merge between questions that had answers, or an answer being accepted after a merge but before the user refreshed the merged question. Or it could be aliens.

1
  • 1
    Aliens with... cosmic rays?!
    – Pops
    Jan 28, 2011 at 20:45
0

I could have sworn that this was a dupe, but I can't find one. If I recall correctly, January 1, 2001 is a special date for Stack Exchange. (To be more specific, it's 01/01/01 at 0000 hours.) It shows up sometimes in migrations and other situations where, say, an action on a post predates the post's creation date.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .