3

Hello, I recently went searching meta for a question about the markdown engine and stumbled upon a question instead about the markdown editor. I read into it and wound up at the blog: http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2009/01/wmd-editor-reverse-engineered/

In that blog post is this question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/406132/reverse-engineering-the-wmd-editor which yields a 404 on stackoverflow.

I can't quite imagine why such a question would be deleted. So why was it?

  • It's a bit meta, isn't it? Jeff Atwood says in one of the answers that it was only moved to SO to get greater exposure. But it is, in fact, "Not a Real Question." – Robert Harvey Feb 4 '11 at 22:49
  • @Rob I'm not 10k, so I couldn't read the question's text. Even if it wasn't a real question, why not have it undeleted and closed instead? – Earlz Feb 5 '11 at 2:20
  • Closing a question really means it's eventually deleted. There is a two day grace period between the time a question is closed and it is voted for deletion, but that's what it amounts to. This particular question was closed by a moderator, but it was deleted by community vote. The deletion message reads: deleted by SilentGhost, bmargulies, Roger Pate May 20 '10 at 19:18 – Robert Harvey Feb 5 '11 at 2:52
3

It was a convenient discussion and wiki spot for reverse engineering the markdown engine since the author wasn't easy to contact.

It served its purpose, and is now only available to 10k+ reputation users as a historical artifact, but is not of any use to the programming community at large and thus doesn't belong on SO.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .