Possible Duplicate:
Why not merge reputation across SO, SF, and SU?

Recently I've had a few questions migrated. One went to webmasters.stackexchange.com, one went to wordpress.stackexchange.com, and one went to superuser.com. I don't disagree with the migration of the questions, but it would be nice to have a shared reputation because without such a thing it is hard to participate / follow / discuss across multiple sites.

marked as duplicate by Brandon, Grace Note, Pekka supports GoFundMonica, Ólafur Waage, raven Feb 15 '11 at 17:40

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

migrated from stackoverflow.com Feb 15 '11 at 17:04

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.


This question has been answered before. But to your specific point:

it is hard to participate / follow / discuss across multiple sites.

Even with the minimum rep, you still have the ability to follow / participate / discuss. With the exception of commenting on other's posts. Which the 100 bonus rep should provide that privilege.

  • 1
    You can't have 0 rep. 1 is the minimum. – nyuszika7h Feb 15 '11 at 17:20
  • @N, true, but I was making a point that rep is not needed to participate. – jzd Feb 15 '11 at 17:22
  • 3
    Type at least the first three characters of my name to trigger notification. – nyuszika7h Feb 15 '11 at 17:23

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .