12

I am not sure it's the right place to post this as it's common to all Stack Overflow sites. I suggest sorting sites by user reputation and then alphabetically in the all-sites list of the Stack Overflow button.

Improve this question
1
  • Meta Stack Overflow is the hub for all of the sites in the network - for questions about the engine and network itself - you're fine here. (:
    – Rebecca Chernoff
    Mar 24 '11 at 1:14
3

This list is now sorted by reputation first, and then alphabetically to make it easier to find the site you are looking for.

Improve this answer
12

The list is sorted, it just hasn't kicked in for you yet based on your reputation.

Sites where you have > 200 reputation will be sorted by reputation, highest reputation accounts at the top.

Sites where you have < 200 reputation will then be listed in random order. e at the top.

alt text

Improve this answer
10
  • 6
    Thank you very much for your reply. In my opinion it will be more friendly to sort according to reputation to bring more accessed on the top as it is now and sort the remaining alphabetically. The two lists may be then separated by a horizontal line separator.
    – M.Sameer
    Mar 24 '11 at 3:05
  • Now I have 209 rep in Programmers and it's still not on the top !!
    – M.Sameer
    Mar 25 '11 at 13:57
  • @M.Sameer: The list checks your reputation only once a day, at 0:00 UTC.
    – Borror0
    Mar 25 '11 at 14:19
  • It worked today .. thank you very much.
    – M.Sameer
    Mar 26 '11 at 15:37
  • 6
    random sorting order is the worst way to go, takes me an average of 5 secs to find the site I want to see - honestly why not use good old alphabet?
    – ezmilhouse
    May 19 '11 at 9:06
  • 4
    +1 for alphabetical order, this annoyed me today.
    – addedlovely
    Jun 15 '11 at 8:26
  • 3
    ++1 for alphabetical order. I have to say that scrolling through the a randomly sorted list (several times) to find the site I want is the ONLY negative usability experience on this site.
    – Christopher
    Jul 22 '11 at 13:46
  • @Rebecca Can you explain what you mean by the last line: "e at the top". Is it a typo? or do you mean that it is sorted alphabetically beginning with the letter 'e'?
    – dbjohn
    Sep 25 '11 at 8:41
  • 3
    Why is there a minimum of 200 rep to be sorted? Why can it not be sorted based on the actual rep? Also it can also be sorted by last accessed right?
    – Sterex
    Dec 28 '11 at 5:07
  • 1
    +1 for alphabetical ordering or at least being able to sort these yourself and it remember your sort preference
    – Matt Wilko
    Apr 18 '12 at 13:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .