I think it would be useful if meta.serverfault.com ( and meta.superuser.com) is pointing to this website. After all, there is no reason why we can't lump all the meta discussion together in a single website.

Now meta.serverfault.com works, but meta.superuser.com is still not working. SO Admin, please fix this.

EDIT not by OP, July 29, 2010:
Both URLs now work, but not in the way originally suggested in this post.

  • @Nhu Soon Hui: please edit your question to remove the "status-completed" tag -- meta.superuser.com is still not working. thanks!
    – Ether
    Nov 30, 2009 at 16:56
  • 1
    meta.superuser.com still not working
    – ChrisF Mod
    Mar 24, 2010 at 13:46
  • Why would it be useful?
    – Gnome
    May 15, 2010 at 20:56
  • 1
    @The Cat - Not sure, but if it works for SF, it should be for SU too, consistency and metaphysical considerations.
    – Gnoupi
    May 21, 2010 at 18:40

7 Answers 7


Due to a recent change, the accepted — EDIT: now formerly accepted — answer is no longer correct. meta.superuser.com is now a standalone meta site just for SU, and meta.serverfault.com is now a standalone meta site just for SF.

  • So, I've changed the accepted answer.
    – Graviton
    Jul 27, 2010 at 2:52

I've retagged this question with "bug" because it appears that https://meta.superuser.com/ is not working (https://meta.serverfault.com/ redirects properly though.)


Yet another problem with not having a consistent, overarching brand for the trilogy...


It should probably just be a 301 redirect.

  • 3
    Or a CNAME entry pointing here.
    – Richard
    Jun 28, 2009 at 22:50

For the three two users who will ever type meta.superuser.com in their browser (it certainly isn't linked that way anywhere that I know of), this now works.

Enjoy, all two of you!

  • 2
    You fixed the third "highest bug" in the list, I'm sure you can take the rest of the day off, now.
    – Gnoupi
    Jun 4, 2010 at 11:07
  • @Gnoupi, actually...it really wasn't a bug imo. But it is good to see that stuff is being worked on anyway.
    – jjnguy
    Jun 4, 2010 at 12:19
  • @jjnguy - it wasn't, but it was in the bug list. Hence it should be fixed. Don't question the community :] Joke aside, this request probably would have died somewhere unheard, if not for these "bugs" and "reqs" lists.
    – Gnoupi
    Jun 4, 2010 at 12:22
  • 1
    I want the logo to say Super User too :P
    – Ivo Flipse
    Jun 4, 2010 at 12:59

Well, maybe, it just gets tricky when you have to disambiguate serverfault meta questions with stackoverflow meta questions. But that said, there should be a high amount of colinearity, and tags should be able to supplement the difference.


If that suggestion is implementented, each "question" will have to be tagged by the site name or site-agnostic tag. It would probably better if the engine made a choice mandatory. (ie. made the asker choose at least one site tag before the question is posted )

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .