I've noticed lately that many questions get migrated from SO to other sites or get closed for various reasons (e.g. they're duplicates or off-topic). It made me wonder how migration is possible. I assume that a request to migrate a question has to be confirmed by an admin of the target site. Is that so? Can someone share how it works?


Migration does not require confirmation from the target site. However, mods on the site do get to see a list of recently migrated questions.

It's entirely reasonable that a migrated question will be a dupe of an existing question on the new site. Users on the original site might not be aware of this. This process is working exactly as it should.

Other times, users on the original site may not realize that the question is not exactly on topic for the target site. In these cases the question probably doesn't belong anywhere, and will just die quietly.

  • 7
    It would be nice if those voting to migrate at least checked the FAQ for the target site (there is a link on the dialog) to see if it was on topic, but we can't expect that to be the norm.
    – ChrisF Mod
    May 6 '11 at 11:58
  • It clarifies that then. Any idea why a vote/approval from the target site is not required? I would have assumed the exchange network would benefit from this.. (could be wrong, of course).
    – amit
    May 6 '11 at 12:01
  • 2
    @ChrisF - there's reading? Nobody said there would be reading. :(
    – user27414
    May 6 '11 at 12:02
  • @amit - you could suggest that. It could be that nobody ever thought of that. Or perhaps it would just make more work for mods and slow things down. But feel free to suggest it if you feel it would be an improvement.
    – user27414
    May 6 '11 at 12:02
  • @amit - when there were only 3 well defined sites approval wasn't an issue. Now there are many sites (21 sites launched and another 25 in beta) it might be a time to revisit this. However, I don't think it's that big an issue.
    – ChrisF Mod
    May 6 '11 at 12:04
  • @amit, @Jon's - the idea of migration approval has been raised before, but not formally (i.e. via a question here on Meta).
    – ChrisF Mod
    May 6 '11 at 12:05
  • 2
    @ChrisF and @amit - the fact that mods can see recent migrations gives them a chance to disapprove, rather than having to approve everything.
    – user27414
    May 6 '11 at 12:05
  • @Jon - being a mod (on Web Apps and Programmers) I'm aware of that ;)
    – ChrisF Mod
    May 6 '11 at 12:06
  • @Jon , @ChrisF: the overload on the mods can be done by giving voters an ability to accept merge as well... @Jon: as a mod, what is your opinion about this?
    – amit
    May 6 '11 at 12:14
  • @Jon: my bad, I meant @ChrisF :S
    – amit
    May 6 '11 at 12:18
  • 1
    @amit As a mod, I don't mind so much. Migrations can be a problem if a lot of them happen in a short period of time and the questions are a bad fit for the target site, but that doesn't happen often. For the most part, the approval step isn't needed.
    – Adam Lear StaffMod
    May 6 '11 at 13:30
  • 2
    We moderators see not just recent migrations, but all migrations, to be specific, to and from.
    – Grace Note StaffMod
    May 6 '11 at 13:32

I was about to post the following as a Question but since it would have been a near duplicate of this one I will try to phrase it as an Answer instead.

My main site is GIS Stack Exchange but I have noticed many questions perfect for it posted at Stack Overflow - about 100 for just one GIS product.

I think the best mechanism for migration would be if questions can be nominated by high rep users from either the posted or target site, and then the question nominated for migration gets reviewed by high rep users at the opposite site prior to the migration occurring.

In other words, I'd like to see more push and pull of questions between sites, to make them become (more) on-topic at the target site, and to facilitate easier migration via the review queues at both ends.

  • 3
    +1 This would certainly help reduce balkanization. As it stands now, questions too easily become refugees, pushed out, left to "die quietly". Aug 7 '13 at 14:00
  • 5
    I tried adding a bounty to get some more attention and discussion on this, but it doesn't seem to have done much. It might be better to paste as new, tagged feature-request. Aug 31 '13 at 6:49
  • Thanks for trying @mattwilkie - I'll see if I can post it as a new question distinct from this one. Incidentally, I didn't know you could put a bounty on an answer so I'll have to look into how that works.
    – PolyGeo
    Aug 31 '13 at 7:03
  • One tendency I've noticed on small-to-medium sites (which are not in competition with SO, because they are non-technical) is that we usually try to respect the asker's choice of site, if the question is on-topic there. Suddenly having your question migrated to a site you've never used before can be jarring, especially for new users, so if it's on-topic at the site it was posted, IMHO it should stay there.
    – Kevin
    Jul 20 '20 at 16:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .