I lucidly remember having had cast close to 1700 downvotes last time I happened to look at the stats, a few days ago. This is a recent screenshot from this question:

enter image description here

However, the new vote stats show this:

enter image description here

what happened to them? Has there been some mass deletion?


The old counts simply didn't care about what was deleted (the Posts they went towards), the new counts do, so you'll see the totals reflect that.

To be explicitly clear since the conspiracy theories are already rolling around:

No post/vote data was changed (no recalc, no mass deletion, etc) here, only what "counts" for votes, like most deleted things they aren't factored in these counts now.

  • 6
    Very good, I think that's a positive change. With all the focus on the importance of votes recently, I think some of us are just watching our stats more carefully! – Cody Gray May 9 '11 at 13:19
  • 2
    Will future deletions now change the votes cast amount in realtime? Or does this still require some vote recalcs at some intervals? – BalusC May 9 '11 at 17:43
  • 3
    @Chichiray - it may not be exactly real-time (if we decide cache), but the data is not denormalized, so no recalcs, etc. are required to maintain the counts...since they're pulled from the source. – Nick Craver ModStaff May 9 '11 at 18:20
  • That's what I need to know, thanks :) – BalusC May 9 '11 at 18:23
  • 5
    Not saying it's wrong, but still: why? Especially for downvotes, I'd say deletions are a nice result of rightful downvotes. Hence, why not show that people apparently downvoted "correctly"? – Arjan May 11 '11 at 16:25
  • Nick, just FYI, the 1.0 API seems to still be showing the old counts, just saw it on YiJiang's elections tool elections.stackexchange.com. Related chat conversation chat.meta.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/986165#986165 (I don't expect this to warrant any action, just pointing it out in case it's in 2.0 too) – Pekka Jun 5 '12 at 9:18
  • I think this is no longer true, right? Deleted posts still count for votes? – Ben Brocka Sep 12 '12 at 20:06

Nick / SE appear(s) to have done a 180 and now your votes are back. I suppose you're well aware of that, but this question needed an up-to-date answer :P


I'm just presuming it's a recalc of some sort...anything number wise (rep, votes) seems to get recalculated every so often...is it surprising anymore?

Perhaps the votes were on questions/answers that have been removed (or moved)?

There has been a unusually high focus on votes, the vote interface, vote rules etc etc recently...can't be a coincidence...

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .