Ask yourself how many times you typed the following in a comment:


Me, personally, I'm sick of it. Can we have some data.stackexchange.com-style "magic links" in comments? (inn~iff)

  • 20
    Very, very good idea, especially the FAQ#name one. – Pekka May 20 '11 at 13:18
  • 3
    Why inn? At least on meta they'd be very useful in answers – Michael Mrozek May 20 '11 at 20:30
  • 1
    Instead of alternate forms (as you have for edit), why not provide generic text? [edit "edit it"] [faq#bounty "Read about bounties in the FAQ"] – Fred Nurk May 21 '11 at 6:35
  • Don't see the need for combining [user:] with notification. – Fred Nurk May 21 '11 at 6:35
  • 1
    Requiring a colon in the syntax is less likely to have false positives. Instead of Stack Overflow and [x.se], use [site:XXX] where XXX is SO, SU, SF, or the subdomain of SE. [faq:all] and [faq:section] work, but that leaves nothing for edit except [edit:], which I dislike. Maybe [link:] instead of [site:], then you can include "faq", "meta", and "edit" in [link:]. – Fred Nurk May 21 '11 at 6:38
  • 1
    @fred no, you type [@fred] (like user notification) and it turns into a link - Fred Nurk. – user1228 May 21 '11 at 14:57
  • I've actually never typed that in a comment. Then again, I'm not a mod... – user541686 Jun 8 '11 at 15:51
  • I made a similar feature request some while ago: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/77351/… . I guess I added to much text ;) – Felix Jun 8 '11 at 16:06
  • 6
    Oh super super! I love you with totality and Tootsie-Rolls. With our collective saved-time we shall ascend to Mars, Pluto, and Milky. – Adel Oct 23 '11 at 2:25
  • "Ask yourself how many times you typed the following in a Comment" - Never :^) I often link to some other sites though - in migration suggestions. – ivan_pozdeev Dec 5 '15 at 11:22
  • @robertlongson you tried to approve that edit??? – user1228 Aug 30 '18 at 13:22

11 Answers 11


Most of these now work. My comment below has the following markdown source:

On [main], you are expected to write proper English (as advertised on [english.se]), but here on [meta.se] it's more important to have freehand circles, so please [edit] your post, otherwise I'll have to flag you (see the [FAQ#flagging]). If you're unsure how to use your keyboard, [su] is the right place to ask. There's no Q&A site about unicorns yet, but you can suggest one on [area51.se].

Supported magic links in comments

  • [meta] – link to the current site's Meta; link text is the site name (e.g. "Meta Super User"). Does nothing if the site doesn't have (or already is) a Meta site.

  • [main] – like [meta], just the other way around.

  • [edit] – link to the edit page for the post the comment is on, i.e. /posts/{id}/edit. Link text is "edit" (capitalization is respected).

  • Help center links. Link text for all of these is "help center":

    • [help] should be obvious.
    • [meta-help] links to "What is meta?" (/help/whats-meta)
    • [help/on-topic] links to "What topics can I ask about here?" (/help/on-topic)
    • [help/dont-ask] links to "What types of questions should I avoid asking?" (/help/dont-ask)
    • [help/behavior] links to "What kind of behavior is expected of users?" (/help/behavior).
  • [tour] and [meta-tour] – equivalent to the FAQ version, but links to the site's Tour page (resp. the meta site's Tour page). Link text is "tour" (capitalization is respected). Legacy magic links [about] and [meta-about] are still supported.

  • [ask] – link to the "How to Ask" page

  • [answer] – link to the "How to Answer" page.

  • Links to the front page of Stack Exchange sites (link text is the site name):

  • [chat] – link to the current site's chat site (https://chat.stackoverflow.com/ for SO, https://chat.meta.stackexchange.com/ for Meta SE, https://chat.stackexchange.com/ everywhere else, that last one showing a list of active rooms from the referring site), the link text being "{site name} Chat".

  • On Stack Overflow and localized Stack Overflow sites:

    • [mcve], [reprex], [repro], [mre] and [example] – link to the Minimal Complete & Verifiable Example page for the site.
  • Tags (these work in questions, answers, comments, and chat, but are not formatted as tags in comments):
    [Note that if you're on meta, [tag:tag-name] will still point to the main site. Except on Meta Stack Exchange, which doesn't have a main, [tag:tag-name] makes no difference from [meta-tag:tag-name].]

    • [tag:tag-name] creates a link to the named tag on the main site. e.g
    • [meta-tag:meta-tag-name] creates a link to a tag on meta. e.g

Supported magic links in chat

In chat, only a limited subset of the magic links listed for comments work, plus one chat-specific magic link.

Chat supports the following magic links: [meta], [main], [ask], [answer], all the links to specific sites, and tag links (with tag formatting). Chat also adds [chat-faq], which results in "chat faq".

The tag magic links work as expected on Stack Overflow Chat and Meta Stack Exchange Chat. However, on Stack Exchange Chat, the chat room in which you use the magic link must be associated with a specific Stack Exchange site, and will take on the formatting of tags on that site. When the room is not associated with a specific Stack Exchange site, the text used for the tag magic link receives no special processing.

Supported magic links in questions and answers

On main sites, only the [tag:tag-name] magic links are supported in questions and answers.

On meta sites, only the [tag:tag-name] and [meta-tag:meta-tag-name] magic links are supported in questions and answers.

  • 104
    On [main], you are expected to write proper English (as advertised on English Language & Usage), but here on Meta Stack Exchange it's more important to have freehand circles, so please edit your post, otherwise I'll have to flag you (see the FAQ). If you're unsure how to use your keyboard, Super User is the right place to ask. There's no Q&A site about unicorns yet, but you can suggest one on Area 51. – balpha Jun 6 '11 at 11:48
  • 5
    Very nice, but what about user pages and links to specific posts? Like [main#12345] or [meta.user#12345]... – fretje Jun 6 '11 at 12:06
  • 20
    @fretje: Nope, we're not doing that. It'll take longer to copy the id out of the URL into your [main#...] markup than just copying the whole link. (Besides that, there's also a technical reason: Comments are rendered on the fly, so you'd have to do a DB lookup everytime such a comment is displayed) – balpha Jun 6 '11 at 12:11
  • 15
    @fretje: Do you really have the ids of posts you frequently link to memorized? – balpha Jun 6 '11 at 12:16
  • 1
    And apparently my above comment doesn't work... even the Stack Overflow only hasn't been "translated"... I suppose that's because there have to be spaces around it... could you also translate when there's a '/' after it? – fretje Jun 6 '11 at 14:41
  • 14
    Yay! Two more requests: [how-to-ask], [how-to-answer] (and the anchored versions when they're created). – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Jun 6 '11 at 20:05
  • 2
    And [user:@balpha] adds more awesome to SE :) – Benjol Jun 8 '11 at 7:46
  • 16
    The site-links are nice, but inconsistent: why don't [superuser.se] ([superuser.se]) and [askubuntu.se] ([askubuntu.se]) generate links? Sure, [su] (Stack Exchange) and [ubuntu.se] (Ask Ubuntu) work, but why do I have to remember these special cases? Thanks! – sarnold Jun 24 '11 at 8:56
  • 8
    Could we also have [stackapps] (or [stackapps.se], or even [sa]), please? – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Jul 18 '11 at 0:27
  • 4
    Hey, just found myself wanting [stackapps]. Poor, stackapps, it gets no love. – user1228 Oct 28 '11 at 14:23
  • 7
    Can we puhhlllease have [mso] instead of [metase]? Or [meta.so]? No one remembers the [metase], it doesn't even make sense. – slhck Nov 3 '12 at 12:29
  • 2
    Can we add [sites] (to stackexchange.com/sites obviously)? – Bernhard Barker Aug 15 '13 at 11:18
  • 2
    Hey, [meta.so] and [careers] should be added. Thanks! – user1228 Aug 29 '14 at 17:28
  • 2
    How is it I've been a moderator for 4 years and never knew this existed?! Oh man, this has made my day... – corsiKa Mar 7 '16 at 19:53
  • 3
    [mcve] would be so helpful on Database Administrators – Max Vernon Apr 20 '18 at 15:37


Some more ideas, since this seems to be still active.

Maybe it could also be useful to add things like:

  • [dupe:92060] for "possible duplicate of "
  • [inbox]
  • [review], but I think this is marginal
  • [privilege:name] to link to a specific privilege description


I think this idea can be improved in a generic way like:



  • SITE is SF, SO, SU, meta, metaSU with default to the current site
  • type can be user, post, faq with default to post
  • anchor/id can be the id of a post, of an user and anchor a HTML anchor like in the FAQ, or a comment, or a anwser.

You can only use default values from the left. If you specify SITE you have to specify all.

So on this post:

  • [92060] would link to [meta:post:92060]
  • [92060#answer-92061] would link to my answer (need way to identify the answer's numbers)
  • [SU:post:286219] would link to Unix : List children processes for a given pid
  • [user:1228] will link to the user with ID equal to 1228 on meta
  • [SO:user:1228] will link to the user with ID equal to 1228 on Stack Overflow
  • [SO:faq:#bounty] on the "bounty" section of the SO's FAQ
| improve this answer | |
  • 5
    I especially like the privilege and dupe idea. – Octavian A. Damiean Jun 8 '11 at 15:49
  • 8
    I'd really like to link to specific posts, especially on meta. Would be super handy in executing moderator duties. Prefer syntax of [meta:92060] or [main:667]. – Alex Angas Jun 29 '11 at 0:05
  • 1
    Did these extra suggestions get implemented? I think they would make writing comments on Stack Exchange more convenient. – Alex Essilfie Sep 25 '15 at 8:05
  • 1
    @Alex I do not think so. If it's not in balpha's answer it's probably not implemented. – M'vy Sep 25 '15 at 8:07
  • Too bad. It's unfortunate that these very handy shortcuts weren't implemented. – Alex Essilfie Sep 25 '15 at 8:14
  • 1
    @AlexEssilfie and M'vy, if you're still interested, I've made a userscript that implements the site:type:id magic link idea: meta.stackexchange.com/a/278421/260841 :) – ᔕᖺᘎᕊ Apr 17 '16 at 18:35

I would still like an [accept] which would link to How does accepting an answer work?

| improve this answer | |

In addition to [so], [su], [sf], etc. I would suggest adding [careers] with link text of "Stack Overflow Careers".

| improve this answer | |

A chat room link could be useful I think.


This wouldn't be that useful, more like a fun thing, linking to yourself.

| improve this answer | |
  • 19
    [self] or [this]? :) – balpha Jun 8 '11 at 15:33
  • 1
    Semantically [self] would make more sense in my opinion. :) – Octavian A. Damiean Jun 8 '11 at 15:34
  • 4
    [this] would refer to the current chat room or comment in my weird logic. :D – Octavian A. Damiean Jun 9 '11 at 8:22
  • I would prefer [this] for linking on the chat room and [self] for linking on myself. – CSchulz Jul 28 '11 at 14:25
  • 1
    [chat:ROOM_NAME] might also be useful – Moog Sep 11 '11 at 9:49
  • 1
    [me] would be quicker and more IRC-esque. Though less obvious to OO programmers ;D – Moog Sep 11 '11 at 9:50
  • 1
    @Merlin [me] would be a link to your SO or chat.SO profile. – Octavian A. Damiean Aug 24 '13 at 14:58
  • What language is the this joke referring to? Pardon my ignorance.. – Daniel Springer Nov 16 '16 at 2:52
  • @DaniSpringer this.edited == false – haykam Mar 1 '17 at 2:42
  • @haykam I still don't know what language that is – Daniel Springer Mar 5 '17 at 11:13
  • @DaniSpringer this.jokes[0].language == 'JavaScript' – haykam Mar 5 '17 at 21:38
  • @haykam so its JS? What is the equivalent in python? .self? – Daniel Springer Mar 7 '17 at 3:18
  • @DaniSpringer this.programming.languages.indexOf('Python') == -1 – haykam May 20 '17 at 0:17
  • @haykam hmm. I don't get it. Perhaps I need to refine my python... – Daniel Springer May 20 '17 at 20:30
  • @DaniSpringer this.parent.givenUp == true – haykam May 20 '17 at 20:55

This would save a lot of keystrokes:

[mcve] = [How to create a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example](https://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve)

It would mostly be used on Stack Overflow, as I don't think many users of English Language & Usage would find much use for this, but it would be useful for any programming-related Stack Exchange site.

| improve this answer | |

From the meta sites, I think we most often want to link to the FAQ of the main site, not of the meta site.

Can we have a magic link along the lines of [mainfaq#dontask]?

| improve this answer | |
  • 8
    Alternatively, do it just like we do with tags - have [faq] link the Main one, and [meta-faq] link the Meta one, whether you're on Main or Meta. – Grace Note Jun 9 '11 at 15:18
  • 5
    We're going with @GraceNote's suggestion. – balpha Jun 13 '11 at 17:28

I'm not convinced that new Markdown syntax is needed. This could be handled by having a better interface to insert these links.

There are already a few of useful user scripts in this domain:

| improve this answer | |
  • 6
    Programmers are always fond of mardown. It's like command line over GUI: faster. – M'vy May 21 '11 at 22:33
  • 2
    @M'vy: 1. Stack Exchange isn't specifically for programmers. 2. I'm more of a command-line advocate than the average programmer, and I still think we don't need more markdown here. 3. Just because every problem can be solved by adding a level of indirection doesn't mean it's the best way. – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' May 22 '11 at 9:06
  • 1
    Yes of course. I got your point. Nevertheless, when I answer on my mobile phone as an example... GUI stinks. I already have some difficulties to validate my anwsers. Or copy/pasting isn't easy as well. So if I can avoid doing this by typing instead, I'm in. – M'vy May 22 '11 at 9:50

A lot of the answers under What sites should have hyperlinking (onebox) support in chat? would also be good here. Perhaps some could be site-specific; the English Language and Usage folks probably don't link to MSDN very often.

| improve this answer | |

The userscript Stack Overflow Extras (SOX) supports creating customized magic link into posts:

Use the placeholders $BASEURL, $METABASEURL, $QUESTIONID, and $ANSWERID in the URL.

You can also use it to change the help button to link to the on-topic page:

| improve this answer | |

Some more for the melting pot:

[#12345] for questions

[me] to link to users profile in chat

[chat:ROOM_NAME_OR_ID] for linking to chat rooms

@USERNAME twitter-style user tags which currently work in chat but not comments

| improve this answer | |
  • 5
    the first has been declined (see the comments on my answer); for the second and third see meta.stackexchange.com/questions/92060/… (although both are unlikely to happen); the fourth does work very well: meta.stackoverflow.com/editing-help#comment-reply – balpha Sep 11 '11 at 11:07
  • it would be very handy to have something like [chat:android] but I understand that these are trying to be kept to a minimuum. Thanks for the link to comment-reply. That is getting bookmarked ;) – Moog Sep 11 '11 at 11:22
  • ... and the equivalent id version using # i.e [chat#15] is equivalent to [chat:android]. – Moog Sep 11 '11 at 11:33

You must log in to answer this question.