A renaissance man is a person (man or woman) who is skilled in multiple fields or multiple disciplines, and who has a broad base of knowledge.

The term renaissance man is largely based on the various artists and scholars of the European Renaissance (starting in about 1450 CE), who pursued multiple fields of studies. Perhaps the quintessential renaissance man of this period was Leonardo Da Vinci, who was a master of art, an engineer, an anatomy expert (for the time), and also pursued many other disciplines with great success and aplomb.

The Stack Exchange network contains a very broad range of studies. What if there were a cross-site gold badge awarded for someone who has at least a 1000 reputation on 10 network sites?

Beta and meta would not count for the badge.


Naming it the da Vinci badge is another option for the name.

Reguirements: Earned at least 1000 reputation on any 5 sites in the Stack Exchange network. Reputation earned on beta sites would not count until the site graduated from beta.

  • 11
    This has been proposed before. Should there be a “generalist” badge on Stack Exchange itself?, Additional Badge Ideas — Jack of All Trades, Stack exchange badges, and a few others I can't find right now.
    – ЯegDwight
    Commented May 20, 2011 at 23:59
  • 17
    If a badge like this were created, we'd have to call it the ChrisF badge. Commented May 21, 2011 at 0:01
  • 1
    @RegDwight some of the proposed questions were from the trilogy error when everything was technology and programming related. The last one was brought up in january when there was barely 10 non beta network sites.
    – Chris_O
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 0:20
  • 3
    Another earlier suggestion: Cross-site badges? (Also contains a duplicate of @Rebecca's comment.)
    – mmyers
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 5:58
  • 3
    or name it the Stack Exchange badge. Commented May 21, 2011 at 10:36
  • 1
    I disagree about excluding beta sites, but I like the idea otherwise. Commented May 24, 2011 at 3:50
  • So, that's 5000 reputation total? Commented May 24, 2011 at 4:21
  • @muntoo - the important thing is that is across multiple sites.
    – ChrisF Mod
    Commented May 24, 2011 at 7:54
  • It would have to be only for points earned on answers, not questions. I don't think asking a lot of questions on different subjects makes you a renaissance man. Commented Jun 30, 2011 at 14:30
  • I think this is a great idea. Probably because it would mean a new badge for me, hahaha Commented Oct 14, 2011 at 13:28
  • 1
    @Chris_O. The trilogy error. I like it.
    – TRiG
    Commented Nov 29, 2012 at 1:59

9 Answers 9


That is a good idea, but I fear that 10 SE network sites is too much. I suggest bringing it down to, say, 5.

And I think Meta Stack Overflow and beta sites should totally count, as users put just as much time and energy into those sites as well as the "graduated" sties.

  • 6
    Five just doesn't feel very challenging. I have 1000+ rep on four (SO, SU, Physics.SE, Cooking.SE) already and I'm not even trying. Plus I'll get there on CodeGolf.SE by and by; and perhaps on English.SE in reasonable time. Or should we propose multiple levels---say Widely Read, Encyclopedia, Polymath---requiring an increasing threshold on an increasing number of sites. Commented May 20, 2011 at 23:56
  • 10 does seem like a lot but 5 doesn't seem like enough. Maybe it could be 10k rep spread over 10sites with a 5 site minimum with a 2k or 3k ceiling per site. So if someone has 8k on SO only 3k would go towards badge.
    – Chris_O
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 0:03
  • 5
    @dmckee, @studiohack, @Chris_O: Don't we need real stats on how many users fit the criteria for both 5 and 10 sites (and other thresholds) before espousing numbers from thin air?
    – Fred Nurk
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 6:04
  • I'll do the research but I initially came up with my requirement number by looking at @Jeff's account profile and he almost qualifies unless meta is included.
    – Chris_O
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 7:57
  • 7
    FWIW, five doesn't challenge @dmckee because he is a renaissance man...
    – Shog9
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 15:45
  • ::turns beet red:: Commented May 21, 2011 at 17:34
  • 1
    A few days ago, Gilles managed to get 1000 rep on 10 different sites! Commented Sep 2, 2011 at 10:45

The 'da Vinci' badge has a nice ring to it :) Or pick another from this list.

  • 2
    I like 'da Vinci'
    – Chris_O
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 8:30
  • 3
    +1 I've jumped ship to da Vinci. It has all the cachet of Renaissance Man with none of the potential risks. It is also vastly more accessible than Polymath. An excellent idea. Commented May 21, 2011 at 17:25

Well, there is StackAthlon

Stackathlon 2.5: Leader board for users active on multiple sites

As it turns out, a person with 1k rep on multiple Stack Exchange sites is very, very rare indeed.

This would be platinum level, beyond gold.

  • Me me me! I have >1k rep on 6 sites! Commented Oct 14, 2011 at 13:19
  • So network level badges? Bronze for 1k on more than 3 sites, silver for more than 5k on more than 5 sites, gold for more than 10k on 3 sites and 5k on 7 additional sites...
    – jcolebrand
    Commented Oct 14, 2011 at 13:27
  • 1
    Is this still true? I just passed the 2k mark on my 5th site (some are beta.) I don't feel "very very rare." Commented Nov 16, 2011 at 18:10
  • I think so @KateGregory. Maybe that's just because I want to feel special, but it's not something I often see. Most people seem to focus on one or two sites. Commented Nov 30, 2011 at 14:14
  • @TheUnhandledException well then, we should be medalled for it, shouldn't we? I like da Vinci, if anyone is taking notes Commented Nov 30, 2011 at 14:25

How about naming the badge Renaissance?

Many of the badges act as direct labels for the receiver ("this person is [a] XXX"), but not even most: Beta, Citizen Patrol, Civic Duty, Cleanup, Convention, Nice/Good/Great, ...

"Renaissance" keeps the connection I like from the original -- which I don't get from "polymath" -- without provoking pointless debate (unfounded or not) on including "man."


Since Renaissance Man does not even make sense for female users, I suggest the name Polymath instead.


I should have said "does not make sense to me" because I visualize a badge as a label like something you would wear on your lapel. As a programmer, it's like using the name of a derived class when you should be using the name of the base class. Furthermore, I sensed that (as we would say in programming) "using the wrong qualifier" was only asking for trouble.

But in the comments I learned that some women aren't bothered with the word Man in this context. Perhaps because of the powerful positive associations people have with The Renaissance and Renaissance Man in general.

Furthermore, I am pleasantly surprised to see that no one is complaining about Renaissance Man in the way that I had anticipated. This can only be due the clear-thinking sophisticated meta audience. :-)

In summary, this is not a PC-based answer; it is a logic-inspired answer. It is my own twisted logic, maybe, but not a primitive bristling at a rich phrase laden with positive overtones.

  • 6
    boo, I like renaissance man much better than polymath... but I don't hate this badly enough to take a 1% reputation hit Commented May 20, 2011 at 23:52
  • 3
    I thought about the PC implications but figured since the term references 15th century scholars and is defined as a person in modern dictionaries that we could get away with it. Might be a good question for English.stackexchange.com
    – Chris_O
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 0:12
  • Chris_O: The term is not offensive, you just need two of them: Renaissance Man, and Renaissance Woman. That can never work for a badge title. Commented May 21, 2011 at 0:22
  • 1
    How about Renaisance Person? ;-D Commented May 21, 2011 at 0:57
  • 6
    I'm a woman, and I prefer the term Renaissance Man.
    – PengOne
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 1:09
  • @PengOne: If there is just one woman who prefers Renaissance Woman, then you still need two of them. Commented May 21, 2011 at 1:13
  • 3
    What about Renaissance (Wo)Man?
    – PengOne
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 1:16
  • @PengOne: Propose that in an answer. Commented May 21, 2011 at 1:27
  • 1
    @RickSladkey: Does that mean if there is just one person who prefers Renaissance Robot that we automatically "need" three tags? (If you want seriousness instead, consider how many people prefer to view gender/sex as a spectrum rather than binary.)
    – Fred Nurk
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 6:01
  • @Fred: Your point only strengthens my point. Dividing labels are problematic in general. A badge needs to have one name. If it needs two or ten it's still no good. The only way renaissance will work is Renaissance Person and that sounds clinical to me. Commented May 21, 2011 at 6:08
  • You take it to the extreme and then view it as strengthening, but I don't, nor do I think most sensible people do. PC has its place, but I don't think we need to introduce that nonsense here. Renaissance Man is fine.
    – Fred Nurk
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 6:11
  • @Fred: Sorry, I didn't make myself clear. I never said anything about PC. I actually like Renaissance Man. I'm just being realistic. You can't fight City Hall. Commented May 21, 2011 at 6:27
  • 1
    @RickSladkey: So "Renaissance Man" does make sense for women? Your answer does not agree with your last comment. Perhaps you should make it clear in your answer that someone other than you (who? why don't they speak up?) would have a problem.
    – Fred Nurk
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 7:23
  • 1
    @Fred: @PengOne above already proved me wrong on that one, mea culpa. Some women are quite comfortable with the label Renaissance Man. And you are right again on the second point that to my knowledge no one has balked at the idea. So perhaps it seems like I am tilting at windmills. Really I simply like the word Polymath and somehow ended up the advocate of a practice I find repellent, perhaps out of misguided protectiveness for StackOverflow. Commented May 21, 2011 at 7:36
  • 1
    @CodyGray: Polymath doesn't have the connotation of general excellence that comes from the Renaissance.
    – Fred Nurk
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 10:03

The badge should be named Know-it-All.


I say take it one step further, if they get round to implementing categories of SE sites, you'd have to have 1000 rep in 5 different categories, not just 5 different sites (otherwise SO/Programmers/SU/Unix/Ubuntu - for example - is just too easy).

Note that as it stands, and even without counting meta or beta sites, I'd get your badge if it was just based on 1000 rep on 5 different sites, and I don't think I'm a platinum user!

  • I'm not sure if Area 51 would count. There are only a [handful of users(stackathlon.appspot.com) that have 1k on SO, SU, and SF.
    – Chris_O
    Commented May 24, 2011 at 9:02

Usually information sharing between are not very well accepted. I guess there is there is some performance issue under this.

So I don't think this badge has it's place here. Would it be given on all the 10 sites? only meta? By the way, one of the site should check about all users and ask other sites about his reputation. I do not see what site could handle that but SE. And there is no badge on SE.

  • 1
    It could use some of the same functionality as linking profiles and the script could run the first time you click the accounts tab on your profile per day.
    – Chris_O
    Commented May 21, 2011 at 0:05

How about naming the badge Renaissance (Wo)Man?

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .