I recently answered a question that was several months old, and my answer was accepted. I thought this would earn me a badge, but upon looking, realised the badges were issued for upvoted answers, rather than accepted answers, fair enough I suppose as an answer may have already been accepted. However I did think it strange that there seems to be no gold version of this chain (e.g. 25 upvotes on an answer provided 90+ days after the question was asked). Does anyone know why there is no such badge?


Using EdoDodo's data query, here are some potential awardee numbers:
25 votes, 90 days = nearly 900 users
50 votes, 120 days = 250 users
100 votes, 120 days = 60 users

So now another question presents itself: How many users should a gold badge be awarded to, approximately?

  • Feel free to ask for such badge.. edit one of the tags to badge-request and add full description of the badge. Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 7:55
  • 1
    You may want to run some queries on data.stackexchange.com to see if any existing users would qualify. That would give you some idea of it's potential to be awarded for future users.
    – jonsca
    Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 7:56
  • 3
    And then pretty soon @JeffAtwood will be walking down the halls shouting, "Bring out your dead..."
    – M. Tibbits
    Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 8:25
  • 7
    I've made a query that will take two inputs (the minimum days between question and answer, and the the minimum score of answer) and returns a list of people who would have received the badge, and the number of times they would have received it: data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/s/1555/… Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 8:35
  • 2
    If your answer was actually any good, it would have gotten an upvote at the same time that it was accepted. It's unclear why you think you deserve a badge for providing a mediocre (at best) and late answer. Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 8:50
  • 2
    Wouldn't you get a badge for the 25 upvotes anyway? Isn't that enough?
    – Bo Persson
    Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 9:01
  • 6
    Well, in my opinion the revival/necromancer badges are great since they encourage people who have something new to add to an old question to do so. It seems like it would be a good idea to add a gold version of them. Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 9:16
  • 2
    @CodyGray I only joined the site last week. Clearly your answer was even later than my own, as you have not written it yet. I wasn't saying I deserved a badge, only that I thought I had earned one, but in fact was mistaken. This led to my investigation and the question above re: gold badges. Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 10:14
  • Yeah, upon closer inspection it looks like I got bogged down in the introduction and didn't completely understand the point you were making at the end. I still don't think a badge is necessary here. You already get a badge for answers with 25+ upvotes. Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 10:21
  • @EdoDodo That's great. I have amended my question with some sample results. Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 10:23
  • 2
    Well, gold badges should be difficult to obtain, but not impossible. In my opinion, (100 votes and 120 days) is way too difficult to obtain, and (25 votes and 90 days) is a bit too easy. Perhaps (50 votes and 120 days) would be a good choice? Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 10:41
  • 1
    While I, in principle, agree with @Cody -- there probably shouldn't be a new badge -- I can understand / appreciate a desire to encourage users to revisit and improve old answers / questions.
    – M. Tibbits
    Commented Jul 5, 2011 at 17:45
  • @EdoDodo, I reused some of your ideas in my new answer.
    – Nemo
    Commented May 1, 2015 at 21:06
  • @Nemo your new and late answer. More than 90 days late and having more than 25 votes by now. ;) (why I'm here: this).
    – Will Ness
    Commented Mar 15, 2018 at 15:27

2 Answers 2


I think there is still a need of incentives to answer many more old, unanswered questions. Current badges don't help much: a bronze badge doesn't matter; getting 5 votes on a tumbleweed tag/question is very unlikely, however good your answer might be.

So, I propose: Persephone (gold badge, can be awarded multiple times): Posted 25 good answers to 90+ days old unanswered questions.

It's a mix of Revival, Necromancer and Socratic, with many details from Illuminator. In particular, Socratic is awarded for doing many times something good which didn't necessarily score much. The difficulty should be about the same, I think, despite the numbers being different. The name is also taken from Ancient Greece ("Goddess of the underworld, springtime, flowers and vegetation", says the English Wikipedia); alternatives could be Flamelicus, Zombie Army, Lich King or the original Reanimator.

(Other past suggestion were Highlander, not precisely defined; and The Long-Haul Trucker: Answered n Tumbleweeded questions with at least one upvote.)

See the query and play a bit with the numbers. I get only 38 "winners" on SO, with this necromancer earning it 6 times. However, there are 504 users with 10 or more: with some encouragement they could go the extra mile and clean up a bunch of old questions.

Maybe the badge would scale better and achieve wider impact if it required more answers but less upvoting? People would answer questions worrying about quality rather than upvoting-reactivity of the asker. This alternate version requires only a 0 score where the question had no previous answer: currently 27 winners on SO with the same truly unsung hero at 11 times (!).

An additional requirement for "maintained a positive answer record" could be added, similar to Socratic, but trying to post 50 garbage answers probably gets you banned way earlier than you get the badge. I just realised: a problem is that the badge might be awarded right after an answer is posted, whatever its quality, if it's the first and score 0 is the minimum in such case; perhaps we should only consider answers older than X days, to give people a chance to downvote them.

Update: I did some more runs of the query on multiple sites and it seems to be pretty general. Some sites would have very few awarded, but they would whatever the settings: perhaps just few unanswered questions, or nobody working as unsung hero/necromancer yet. On the many sites where a certain number of users would be matched, the criteria seem fair: wheter the min score for already-answered questions is 5 or 1, or min age is 90/45/10 days, the number of answers qualifying of course varies, but the pattern is always the same. I mean, we would not be unfairly excluding people who only focus on questions X days old or already-answered etc.; altruists hunting for unanswered/old questions to address seem to do so across the board. :)

But then, I'd use double checking of the query.

  • 3
    You can call the badge "Lich king". Commented May 2, 2015 at 5:32
  • 1
    @DeerHunter, let me add it to the alternatives. :)
    – Nemo
    Commented May 2, 2015 at 10:16
  • I like it, but I don't agree with your musing on "more answers with less upvoting". That just seems to encourage spamming a bunch of low-quality answers across old questions.
    – mattdm
    Commented May 10, 2015 at 3:56
  • @mattdm, I agree that's a very important point to consider. I'm relatively new in StackExchange so I don't have an answer, I just tried to present some data. Whoever makes the final call on this proposal surely knows better. :)
    – Nemo
    Commented May 10, 2015 at 19:24
  • // , Persephone comes from Ancient Greek myth, not from their history. Why is the sex of the badge significant enough to pay attention to
    – Nathan
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 15:37
  • 1
    @NathanBasanese I meant history as in (cultural) heritage, but let me change it. Gender is not important but I thought it made a good pair with Socratic; also, being a goddess and the son of Demeter she had some powers the male gods did not have.
    – Nemo
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 17:33
  • *Daughter, of course.
    – Nemo
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 17:49
  • The query nowadays takes too long on StackOverflow, but the same finding applies for other sites: the query on SuperUser finds a handful users who could already earn the badge with the proposed criteria, plus an order of magnitude more who have maybe half the "points" and could earn it with little effort.
    – Nemo
    Commented Jan 19, 2020 at 8:47

I don't think a "gold necromancer" would bring any additional value to the table.

Necromancer exists to encourage people to continue answering old questions instead of focusing entirely on new questions. There's not a lot of difference between 60-day-old questions and more-than-60-day-old questions, so the new badge would be filling the exact same niche as the current one.

You could increase the score requirement, but as commenters have pointed out, there are already badges for high-scoring answers.

"Gold necromancer" wouldn't complete the "Revival/Necromancer/... pattern," either, because it's not a pattern. Revival is only awarded to the "first answer scoring 2 or more" (emphasis mine), so it serves a different purpose than Necromancer: reducing the number of unanswered/poorly answered questions.

One criterion that might make sense for a new badge is earning an acceptance on an old question. However, the OP may no longer be around, and a decent answer would get upvotes in addition to the checkmark, so this wouldn't be too useful in practice. It wouldn't deserve to be gold, either.

  • 5
    I think gold necromancer makes a lot of sense when we consider that old answers can be outdated although they have been high quality once in the past. See meta.stackexchange.com/questions/292502 Commented Mar 17, 2017 at 13:12
  • 1
    @akostadinov check out my proposal for gold necromancer on meta.so.
    – Will Ness
    Commented Mar 15, 2018 at 22:18

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .