There is a distinct decline in the level of civility on all the sites here. Some of this is due to new users coming in and posting spam and other nonsense, but the off-topic and downvote buttons are doing a pretty good job of keeping this under control.

Unfortunately, a lot of this is coming from more experienced users, and the site's built-in moderation system does not (and probably cannot) handle this very well. Folks are rushing to pound new users down with "this belongs on meta!", "this is off topic", "this is a duplicate!" and "read the Help!". (Which is correct, but should be done nicer) All this, of course, is accompanied by a flurry of downvotes. This is not very welcoming to new users who don't know about meta, the Help, or what counts as off-topic.

Now I am not proposing that we just allow off-topic, meta, or duplicate questions. However, I think we could be gentler in the way we express these sorts of things. Explain what meta and the FAQ are and provide useful links. Just using please and thank-you when asking folks to read the FAQ or post something on meta would be an improvement. I also think we could rein in the downvoting a bit. Not that we shouldn't vote stuff down, but unless a new user's post is clearly spam, voting it down to -1 or -2 should be sufficient to send a message without piling on.

I like Stack Exchange and I want it to become a resource for everyone, not just an elitist site for high-rep users on the sites.

  • 48
    The links to that information should be better displayed, and perhaps displayed more often. Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 21:17
  • 442
    This is why I've suggested having comments for when things are voted down. That way people get helpful hints instead of just the big minus sign. Unfortunately, the suggestion was declined by management. :(
    – Kyralessa
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 21:21
  • 133
    For starters, let's stop using the derogatory term "noobs"?
    – Ates Goral
    Commented Oct 17, 2008 at 14:39
  • 46
    @Michael I think it's more likely it came from the word 'newbie' which I don't find offensive at all.
    – rustyshelf
    Commented Nov 20, 2008 at 23:42
  • 141
    As a noob here myself the most irritating thing I have experienced is being voted down without explanation. I'm not here to gain reputation but to get help. I try to be helpful in return. So if an answer is deemed unhelpful I would like to know why so that I can make better answers in future.
    – Noel Walters
    Commented Jan 26, 2009 at 11:08
  • 169
    Rolled back to "noobs". The term is used in our field and I don't think anyone takes it particularly offensively. Tired of political correctness everywhere.
    – mmcdole
    Commented Feb 16, 2009 at 2:04
  • 23
    I totally agree, I've caught wind of this myself and I’ve only been here two weeks. It takes a lot to not attack back via comments. This “decline in the level of civility” can lead to very large nonsense/bickering comment chains.
    – NTDLS
    Commented Feb 21, 2009 at 5:16
  • 52
    I agree. It's very offensive to be a new user, post a question, and have it hit with "topic closed". Even it's a duplicate question, don't bar people from answering it. Some questions that I thought were reasonable were IMHO inappropriately closed. My reaction was "**** this ****ing site!"
    – Anonymous
    Commented Feb 23, 2009 at 20:01
  • 30
    I've always thought that we programmers tend to be a little bit arrogant. Maybe it comes with the binary numerical system understanding Commented May 10, 2009 at 19:27
  • 33
    The beatings will continue until morale improves?
    – sclarson
    Commented May 12, 2009 at 23:56
  • 29
    This is typical. Someone designs and creates a system (StackOverflow) that fails to take into account the nature of human beings, and then someone (in this case, you) criticises the humans for just being themselves and not adapting to the flaws of the system.
    – Timwi
    Commented May 13, 2009 at 0:40
  • 38
    I'd definitely change "noobs" to "newcomers", because standard English is always more understandable. Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 10:39
  • 14
    @mcandre: where in the manifesto is that true: [This is a place for specific, complex questions] That's your personal wish for this place, just as my personal wish for this place is somewhere between experts-exchange and slashdot. Guess what, neither of us are going to get what we want, but IMHO, if we were closer to my vision, we get a better tool all-around and not just some silo to your ego of eliteness.
    – Chris K
    Commented Aug 18, 2009 at 18:23
  • 76
    I find so ironic that this post has been "protected" against newbies...
    – yms
    Commented Apr 24, 2011 at 22:37
  • 115
    I know that when I started I found the FAQ to be singularly unhelpful and got downvoted on my first interaction with StackOverflow because I had no idea why I couldn't leave comments or make votes (probably the two most used features of this website), so left a comment the only way I could, as an answer. I got downvoted with no explanation except the advice that I should have commented and / or upvoted (which I didn't have the reputation to do). It wasn't until just recently that I discovered the FAQ does deal with comments and votes, but only under Reputation, not what I came here for
    – James K
    Commented Sep 16, 2012 at 1:46

51 Answers 51


While I agree, there are a few points to note:

  • 1 upvote clears the rep cost of 5 downvotes.
  • New users need to learn and those with the "mod" class rep levels simply don't have time to hand-hold all the new users.
  • I (and we) always take "n00bism" into account before smashing down (I tend to favour closing if possible to save them rep).
  • The up/down vote system is not just about rep, it is the quality control mechanism for Stack Exchange.
  • On the welcome page and the FAQ it clearly states everything that you have mentioned.

Now, like I said, we should take it into account. But the fact remains, the up/down vote system is the core of how we get the "good stuff" up and the "bad stuff" down. It is not designed to be a personal attack against the users in question.

Looking at "exhibit A"..

  • It's not offensive.
  • I don't even think it really belongs on uservoice. I would have commented and closed it.
  • I would not have voted down due to the fact that it is a valid question and not really covered by the official FAQ (the "unofficial FAQ" really pisses me off, that should not have survived private beta for this very reason).
  • The abusive responses are not helpful, I have modded them down, and everyone else should have done the same.

Can we please remember that we are supposed to be adults, we are supposed to be problem-solvers by trade. So, can we try to apply some brain cells to things please?

  • 191
    The closing is a much larger slap in the face than a downvote IMO. You should be using this power as sparingly as possible.
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 18:44
  • 78
    I disagree, a comment outlining why it as closed and suggestions on how to make it appropriate is good for two reasons. 1. It stops them getting slammed by other users. 2. It stops a flame war starting and helps the whole process move on.
    – Rob Cooper
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 18:47
  • 50
    "1 upvote clears the rep cost of several downvotes." While I think this is a good design decision, I wonder how many noobs realize this. A lot of them are probably freaking out at their question being at -5 not realizing that the one upvote meant they had no net loss of rep. Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 20:21
  • 17
    Some people implicitly understand the need for civility. Others do not, unfortunately, so we need to say so explicitly.
    – Mike Dunlavey
    Commented Jan 12, 2009 at 22:20
  • 4
    Is it really in the spirit of SO that stackoverflow.com/questions/84556/… is ok, and that stackoverflow.com/questions/907873 is not?
    – Curt Sampson
    Commented May 25, 2009 at 23:41
  • 3
    IMHO, -1 is enough to show that the post is "bad", and for the OP to realise that "something should be done".
    – yo'
    Commented Jan 10, 2013 at 17:13
  • 26
    @GEOCHET You must be joking. Rep matters much more when someone is just trying to get started (and the ones who care most are the ones you most want to hold onto as future contributors!). A small change in rep can impact site privileges more easily, and of course the relative effect of downvoting on total rep is much higher. I would love to know how many people have abandoned the site because of being downvoted on one of their first posts.
    – A.M.
    Commented Jul 1, 2013 at 19:09
  • 20
    Actually, there is probably a way to find out about this by looking at the records: Search for users who have not logged in in a long time, and see what the last votes on their posts before they left were. (I would be happy to be corrected on my assumption that downvoting chases newbies away, but I would have to see the evidence first.)
    – A.M.
    Commented Jul 1, 2013 at 19:16
  • 19
    Once someone's post gets a downvote, he rarely gets a upvote afterwards.
    – Jamie
    Commented Mar 29, 2015 at 8:37
  • 7
    I've experienced many simply spiteful acts on this site. If someone challenges a post I make and I response with anything other than an apology and begging for forgiveness (and only then can I respond) the likelihood skyrockets of that person down voting that post, viewing my other posts and down voting those, and, I suspect, having friends with higher rep take more drastic action. Commented Apr 24, 2015 at 21:54
  • 32
    "1 upvote clears the rep cost of several downvotes." As far as rep goes that's true, but psychologically speaking, one downvote can have a much bigger impact than multiple upvotes.
    – Suragch
    Commented Jun 15, 2015 at 5:51
  • 4
    "Welcome to Money.SE. Please take the tour to see how the site works and what questions are on topic here. " - that took 4 characters, as I use a text expander and have a few SE canned responses to offer. Never too busy to try to keep a newer member visiting. Commented Sep 5, 2016 at 3:50
  • 12
    Do note: 1 upvote clears the rep cost of several downvotes. Does rep matter to a newcomer? What matters is answers. New users need to learn and those with the "mod" class rep levels simply don't have time to hand-hold all the new users. While this is true, and doubt anything can fix this hostility. I (and we) always take "n00bism" into account before smashing down (I tend to favour closing if possible to save them rep). Do you favor helping the user over closing them?(no offense). As mentioned earlier, newbs don't care about rep. They care about self morale and answers. ... Commented Jun 8, 2017 at 13:31
  • 10
    ... On the welcome page and the FAQ it clearly states everything that you have mentioned. the FAQ has 20 pages just for questions and answers. Just as you mentioned "High rep users have no time to handle all the newbs, newbs do not have enough time to read 20 pages of FAQ. (you may argue, "we're in charge") Regarding downvotes, you mentioned: It is not designed to be a personal attack against the users in question. Does the newb know that? Is it mentioned to the OP? While I believe in anonymous downvotes, It's quite not helpful to new users. They may perceive it as dislikes. Commented Jun 8, 2017 at 13:41
  • 13
    @Unitato Yes! Why would reputation not matter to us new users? Once y'all get past 1000, you're invincible. But we're stuck forever in a cycle of question-downvote. Commented Apr 18, 2018 at 3:21

I recommend some type of cookie-cutter response that we can just copy-and-paste depending on the mistake made. For example:

This type of question is considered a 'poll' and is outside Stack Overflow's scope. Please rephrase the question so that it can be answered definitively or it will be closed.

...or something like that. I think that the moderators on javaranch.com do something similar when their newbies break the rules.

  • 31
    LOL! I was doing this for ages during private beta, it just got me downmodded! I have several snippets that I used in Google Notebook for easy access!
    – Rob Cooper
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 21:17
  • @Rob : Now that you can assign your answer as wiki editable at least you will not get the rep hit when people downmod your answer.
    – Espo
    Commented Sep 17, 2008 at 20:26
  • 12
    The wording of your example is still too harsh in my opinion. The frequently highly negative reactions of newbie Wikipedians to messages with similar purpose and tone is a case in point. Commented Nov 19, 2008 at 5:39
  • 1
    best would be if there was just something we could type that would show up as the response, like bbcodelike: [rules] Commented Aug 18, 2009 at 1:20
  • 6
    Isn't this basically what closing a question does? It adds a canned message explaining why the question is off-topic. (Wait, this is a really old answer. Did you have close votes back then?)
    – Ajedi32
    Commented Jun 15, 2015 at 14:49
  • 1
    @MichaelRatanapintha - there probably is no wording that won't feel harsh ... I think any solution will have to link to a url about "Try not to take it personally." To explain to newcomers why SE sites operate this way. Commented Apr 11, 2017 at 7:12

I definitely believe this is a problem. I recommended this site to my sister recently. She is an inexperienced programmer, and her project director switched them from Visual Studio to Borland mid-project. She has a master's degree in mathematics and has only taken 1-2 college level programming classes, but she has been added onto a programming project as one of her tours in the entry level program of her department. She was struggling with some of the differences between the two development environments. She did find some help on certain Borland sites, but she had been largely at a loss for some of the errors she was running into. That's when I sent her here.

I've been following Stack Overflow since Jeff Atwood started talking about it on Coding Horror. I have to confess I am more lurker/observer than anything else. I was extremely pleased at how quickly questions were answered, and she joined up on my recommendation.

Her first question was almost immediately attacked as being homework, while also being voted down and criticized for its format. While some of the reasoning (except the homework stuff) was accurate, the method in which it was presented was wholly inappropriate, especially for a new user. She was almost immediately turned off by the responses, and felt like she should return to her forum resources.

Thankfully, a few long time users came by, ANSWERED HER QUESTION, and encouraged her to keep participating. They redeemed both her opinion and my own about the site. There was a night and day difference between how the users, who basically took the same actions in showing her a better way to ask the question, responded.

While I definitely believe we need to be using up/down votes as they are intended, if members can't be respectfully helpful to new users, we need some new way of communicating the proper way to use the website.

  • 5
    This is the crux, IMHO: people will overlook some brusque interactions IF there are others who actually help.
    – user169512
    Commented Apr 30, 2014 at 16:59
  • 7
    I can't say how very helpful this is in depicting what is probably a sadly common experience here.
    – Ky -
    Commented Oct 24, 2014 at 19:13
  • 4
    Personally I don't feel bad for being called a noob if that's what I happen to be, as long as my question gets answered or I'm pointed to the existing answer. Pride is a small price to pay for knowledge, and this is not even something specific to SO. Commented Jul 9, 2015 at 8:37
  • "also being voted down and criticized for its format. " you present no evidence that the question did not deserve down votes and criticism.
    – Raedwald
    Commented Feb 27, 2016 at 18:54
  • 9
    @Raedwald - true, but missing the point: what this feels like to new users. The tone on SE sites is often atrocious. Unnecessarily so. Unprofessional. Commented Apr 11, 2017 at 7:17
  • 100% agree. I'm seeing this problem on less popular, but arguably important Stacks, where it almost seems like the intent of the community is to drive away potential new users who have not yet learned how to ask good questions, but are earnest in their intent. (In some sense Stack is, in spirit, a hacker forum, so the idea that new users may not have read the instructions shouldn't be perceived as offensive.)
    – DukeZhou
    Commented Apr 12, 2017 at 17:01

I recommend some type of cookie-cutter response that we can just copy-and-paste depending on the mistake made.

I agree with Outlaw Programmer, but would add that it would be useful if there was a menu or similar to quickly (and politely) allow "problem post" identification.

For example, if you see that a post is a duplicate, you hit a button, enter the URL/ID of the post duplicated. Successive viewers can then agree or disagree. The question poster will get a canned and polite notification.

So instead of templating being a burden on individual users, have it be a function of the system for the most common problem posts.

Offhand, those seem to be:

  • Duplicate
  • Belongs in uservoice
  • Offtopic
  • Not a question
  • Unclear question (not enough detail to respond, etc.)
  • ...More as post requirements develop

In essence this would be a votable, post classification tag.

Quick and painless for advanced users... just choose the classification from a list of canned ones, or vote up the existing classification(s) if you agree.

It would be friendly and helpful to the new(er)bies. They would see "15 people think this post belongs in the uservoice section. Do you want to move it there?" or "107 people think you should probably add more detail to your question. Edit now?"


  • 1
    I strongly agree: there needs to be an automated "mark as duplicate" system if the site as intended to function as intended at a large scale.
    – Tom Smith
    Commented Feb 12, 2009 at 1:11
  • 9
    +1. The current "close as duplicate" button also posts a comment that reads "possible duplicate of <link>". It'd be great if the other close votes did something similar with a canned polite response/link to the FAQ. Commented Mar 1, 2012 at 6:12

Here are a couple of requests on UserVoice.com

[Provide clear and solid guidelines for SO users][1] [declined]

[Formulate and publish moderation policy][2] [completed]

Admin response

... if site behaviors are not self-evident, we have failed....


Maybe it's time to acknowledge that users need clean guidelines?

If people keep asking such questions, maybe you really failed to explain what Stack Overflow is.

How can this be obvious?:


  • 5
    what is is according to the designers' intent and what it will become based on community usage may be two very different things. Let it evolve for a while before pruning the shoots, it's only been two days! Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 3:40
  • 1
    One important question: self-evident to who? Ever been new to a project, and the other developers tell you to X the Y because Z? And you don't know what X, Y and Z are, yet. Commented Oct 30, 2017 at 21:14
  • @Ondrej You removed the dead link URLs but not the actual links, leaving big bold broken text in the answer and leaving the answer without context. Not useful! Commented May 17, 2019 at 15:33

I'm a newbie and a few days ago I asked How many reputation points do I need to do X?, At this point I had already read the FAQ, browsed by the page and even answered a couple of questions.

I still get a canned "Try looking at the FAQ here".

Having read the FAQ I felt a little bad, until someone else clarified that there is an "Unofficial FAQ".

I think that there should be a really big (or at least the same size as the other ones) link to a real FAQ which includes all the information in the Unofficial FAQ.

  • It looks like Jeff actually improved the official FAQ recently. For most of the private beta the official FAQ was almost content free, hence the unofficial FAQ. I think we really ought to just have one or the other. Be much less confusing that way. Commented Sep 17, 2008 at 1:11
  • The benefit of the unofficial FAQ is the change history so that it's easy to see what has changed recently. It's also updated much more frequently as site rules change. I think there's a place for both.
    – Sam Hasler
    Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 12:11
  • You don't need any reputation to do X, especially if you live near Winsor where it is very available. ... .. yeah, i'm about to get flamed completely, but the humour out weighs the retribution i will face.
    – stephenbayer
    Commented Sep 19, 2008 at 20:08
  • 39
    The elitism needs to stop. Commented Dec 6, 2009 at 12:36



I, being a n00b myself, didn't realize there was already a system called Badges (yes, I see the big button up top, I just hadn't gotten around to investigating it). Below is my original suggestion, but now that I know there is already a badges system implemented...

I suggest we extend Badges to incorporate tests on various subject matters, instead of just auto-generated values, as it does now. Just like real boy-scout badges. Learn how to tie a knot, take the knot tying test, get a badge. Read the FAQ, take the FAQ test, get a badge.


(Read below for a wordier way of saying the same thing.)


Implement a n00b training and rating system as part of the user account. When a person makes a new account they start out as a n00b, with a score of 0. If they want to increase that score, they have to take tests. The score on the test advances your n00b score. There are multiple tests in different topic areas, and the various tests are weighted differently.

For example, there could be a test about basic site navigation. It could be a low valued test, so even if you get a 100% score on the test, it only boosts your n00b level a little.

Another test could be proving you know the answers from the various FAQs. This could be a medium weighted score.

Another test could be proving you know how the various social systems work, and what socially acceptable behaviour is. It would help to have a "coding standard" type document that covers this, so that people who don't just "get it" can learn it.

This kind of system is already in place on a lot of forum software, but they rate the users on how many posts, giving them various levels of experience, starting at n00b and ending at SysOp (or Admin for you youngsters).

This will be an additional rating system to reputation, and it's opt-in. Reputation is socially controlled. User experience level is something you can learn and test your way to success with, whether anyone likes what you have to say or not.

In this way, you can prove that you've read the FAQ, and understand it enough to answer the questions in the test, and get the appropriate "scout badge". That way, when people are answering your questions, they know at what level to start.. A respondant might think "Should I mention the FAQ to this guy?.. Oh, no, I see he's read the FAQ already, and he's still asking this question. Let me think about it a little deeper, or see if the FAQ is ambiguous or lacking in content.", etc.

I think a system like that would be very cool. You could even have technical topic area "certifications" that can contribute to that... So a user can prove that they know what the heck they are talking about in C++ or Win32 COM programming. The tests could be user generated, and people could add new ones, evolving the site as it goes on.

  • 10
    I'm not a noob, and pretty experienced (and a moderator on the Borland/CodeGear/Embarcadero forums since 2001), but if S.O. had asked me to take tests before being able to answer or upvote, I would have declined from the start. Downvotes and close votes are pretty big hurdles, but can be overcome. A hurdle like "admittance tests" would turn off most new users before they even started. Heck, even having to sign up on a site is often a hurdle already. Commented Apr 7, 2018 at 16:22


We've all been noobs, as superwiren stated, that's certainly true.

But there's a correct way to be a noob, and a wrong way.

When you visit a new place, you should spend some time just looking around and absorbing the culture. That way, you'll learn how to behave in (local) community. When you ask the first question or give a first answer, you'll do it the right way.

The other way is to start dancing fandango in a crowded metro. Generally, this is somehow frowned upon.

Many commenters are forgetting that for every noob that doesn't know how to behave there are ten of the first sort. Kudos to them! And to show them that we appreciate them, we should scream at the latter sort even more loudly!

  • Good point.. But like I said in my response, we should take n00bism in to account. Not everyone is a good n00b, but that is not to say they may not end up being a great member of the community.. I say be gentle with them, but still use the system. I have noticed some new users excel..
    – Rob Cooper
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 18:56
  • Being noob can't be in incorrect way. There could only be its incorrect treatment.
    – Thevs
    Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 20:04
  • 14
    Disagree. A parabole: guy comes into town for the first time. Observes how the people are interacting. Enters the bus and asks the driver for information. Or: enters the bus, starts screaming, spitting and throwing around pictures with naked ladies. Same treatment in both cases? I don't thinks so!
    – gabr
    Commented Sep 21, 2008 at 8:27
  • 7
    Who says there is a correct way to be a n00b? The most successful "things" on the internet are the ones with the fewest rules, diversity is what drives great content.
    – John Channing
    Commented Sep 27, 2008 at 9:38
  • I appreciate this answer. I've been frustrated by visitors who have decided with their first post that our "on topic" list needs to expand to whatever they wish to ask. Or someone answering a factual money question with 6 biblical quotes and then going to meta to accuse us of censorship when his answer is closed. Commented Sep 5, 2016 at 3:57

Maybe Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky could put together a video tutorial explaining how Stack Overflow works and explaining some of the do's and don'ts.

From seeing a video of Joel giving a presentation of FogBugz and listening to the podcast I imagine they could make it humorous enough that people would watch the whole thing and informative enough that they could raise the level of n00bism here.

In fact, I think it's such a good idea that I've made a uservoice suggestion for creating a tutorial video.

And it's been declined: "if the site isn't somewhat self-evident, we have failed -- video or not".

  • 1
    I like this idea. His FogBugz presentation was great. Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 21:13
  • 2
    If our community needs a video to use such a simple site we are doomed for failure.
    Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 4:03
  • 2
    If it stops just one person behaving in a way that will get them voted down, and potentially put them off the site then surely it's worth doing.
    – Sam Hasler
    Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 12:10
  • 2
    The issue is broader than coding. It's a simple matter of maturity and the golden rule. Shaming people is not what we should be doing. It wouldn't take much video to say "Look out for the other guy, and they'll look out for you".
    – Mike Dunlavey
    Commented Jan 12, 2009 at 22:17
  • 1
    ...and just for fun, they could make the video in the style of those old 1960s instructional movies they used to show in schools: "Stack Overflow: the silent free-time killer!" Commented Jan 27, 2009 at 20:29
  • 9
    "we have failed" Yes, you have. Anything that has to have pages and pages and pages and pages of FAQ, is not simple and will NEVER be read. NEVER. So redesign it
    – adolf garlic
    Commented Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14
  • 2
    @adolf garlic, we're programmers, we like to know exactly how something works. So it's not surprising that so many FAQ pages exist. As it is most new users don't seem to have to read them to understand how to use the site. They are just there to refer to for the minority of users who ask such questions.
    – Sam Hasler
    Commented Apr 21, 2009 at 10:39
  • 8
    > it's been declined: "if the site isn't somewhat self-evident, we have failed -- video or not" And yet... there are training videos for FogBugz.
    – Ether
    Commented Aug 27, 2009 at 3:21
  • "If a picture is worth a thousand words, a video must be worth millions (of words)". A Looong and dense FAQ seems like a logical candidate for a FAQ video. Video - Learning from Stackoverflow. Video - Good Stackoverflow Citizen by Joel and Jeff
    – GuruM
    Commented Aug 27, 2014 at 4:29
  • YouTube is full of newbie learning videos (from Arduino to Graphene to Cooking). Search video-first text-next, saves time/effort and a starting point if it's worth it. Significantly, it took 30 minutes to find an ok stackoverflow how-to video.
    – GuruM
    Commented Aug 27, 2014 at 4:31
  • If a newbie learns top 80% of proper usage from the video, the site should see a lot of happy users - newbies as well as moderators. The rest can come from links to FAQ, experience etc.
    – GuruM
    Commented Aug 27, 2014 at 4:40
  • 2
    A playlist of multiple short 10 minute clips would be more useful than a single big video. This would also help moderators get the message across for specific misbehavior. This will help "attention-deficit"/"reading-disabled"/clueless newbies latch on fast and bridge the learning-gap with least effort.
    – GuruM
    Commented Aug 27, 2014 at 6:40
  • Love your idea! I don't buy the "self-evident" argument. Self-evident to who? If the people writing that set up the site, then the site will be tailored to the way they think, and things will be self-evident to them. Commented Oct 30, 2017 at 21:19

If lots of people are asking the same questions about Stack Overflow, then that's potentially a usability problem.

And if lots of people are asking (and answering) poll-type questions, then that is apparently an interesting use-case.

  • hmm. And get voted up and down like in real poll :)
    – Thevs
    Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 18:48
  • I agree. One of the things that Stack Overflow is trying to do is aggregate knowledge, "wisdoms of crowds" type polls are one effect way of doing that.
    – John Channing
    Commented Sep 27, 2008 at 9:34
  • 2
    I don't want the rep for the sake of rep, I want answers even if I don't get any rep.
    – Silvercode
    Commented Nov 4, 2008 at 11:09

I am a noob. I've been registered for less than 24 hours after finding Stack Overflow on Reddit, and I've been impressed with both the level of civility and usefulness of many of the questions and answers. I'm also very intrigued by the reputation system and the inventiveness of the site's designers in trying to design a system that keeps up the site's quality and doesn't let it devolve into something like Digg.

Both of these things encouraged me to try to engage with the site (in spite of the OpenID painfulness) vs. just lurk and go away. I have 63 mod points now, so I don't think the 15-point up-vote hurdle is too high at all if I can pass it.

In short, from the noob perspective I don't think there's a big problem, but I do appreciate Chris' advice that you all be nice to us (except for the cretins with the "How do I use Windows?" questions). The system is complicated enough that the real, AKA "unofficial", FAQ really needs to be linked to in the menu (as levhita suggests), not the useless one (or merge the two).

  • @ShadowWizardLoveZelda I don't think adding links to general definitions is useful when every modern browser allows users to highlight a word and search for it. It's a community wiki, so it's fair game, but removing the "dumbass" was the only helpful part of that edit in my opinion. Replacing "Word" with "Windows" and adding a link to 'Reddit' like it's some mysterious name and not a site with 52 million daily active users were weird choices.
    – ColleenV
    Commented Jan 11 at 14:01
  • @ColleenV the replacing between Word and Windows was done by the user claiming to be the original author (can't verify, the author account is deleted) Peter only added the links and fixed SO to be Stack Overflow. That isn't a bad edit. I do agree about the bad word, I've removed it as well now. Commented Jan 11 at 15:07
  • @ShadowWizardLoveZelda this whole QA was migrated, the original author just didn't have an account here at the time as far as i can tell. If you follow it back to the source it is the same author
    – Kevin B
    Commented Jan 11 at 15:29
  • @ShadowWizardLoveZelda I wish more people would experience browsing a site with a screen reader just once. Peppering text with useless links that have no description isn't helpful. Why link to Wikipedia (the first search result that comes up for "what is Reddit) to explain what Reddit is when you can just link to the site, which does a fine job of explaining what it is? Adding noise is not helpful.
    – ColleenV
    Commented Jan 11 at 17:50
  • @KevinB ah thanks, didn't dig that deep. Still, the OP of the answer made that edit, not Peter. Commented Jan 11 at 18:09
  • @ColleenV well I never saw any problem with adding links to common terms, while maybe not great and not needed when it's the only edit, can't see any harm. But it's worth its own discussion here on MSE, if there isn't one already. Commented Jan 11 at 18:11
  • @ColleenV OK, looks like you're correct here. See this, and feel free to confront the editor and show him this discussion, asking to stop adding the trivial Wikipedia links. (Even if editor didn't comment and no auto complete, they're pingable.) Commented Jan 11 at 21:09

I am a newbie myself, and I really like the idea around the site. Reputation-based is really great and fun and makes it like something of a Wikipedia 2.0 in my opinion. There is just one thing that annoys me a bit. I saw a couple of newbies being heavily downvoted without any answer or explanation. While this has not yet happened to me personally, I can imagine how frustrating this is. What about downvotes requiring mandatory comment? Now I agree that 'RTFM' would be enough of a comment - still it would definitively look less cowardly.

If you don't agree... Well... Weapons Free ;)

  • +1, getting a downvote without a comment is annoying. But would those comments be constructive? Doubt it. Still, suggesting that they leave a comment every time they downvote (via one of those redboxes) wouldn't be bad.
    – jcollum
    Commented Jan 22, 2009 at 22:48
  • The difference will be that you sign your name when you downvote. One will have to take the responsibility of one's opinion.
    – Anonymous
    Commented Jan 22, 2009 at 22:54
  • 3
    It's also nice to give a reason when upvoting. Both positive and negative feedback will help to improve the quality of questions and answers on SO.
    – Noel Walters
    Commented Jan 27, 2009 at 19:12
  • However, most upvotes are just because what you're saying is right. It's more informative to explain why what you're saying is wrong. Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 10:52
  • I was hardly downvoted and I think even sneaked upon linked accounts. I can say it was really harsh, and my example is still alive today. While I do believe I deserved all the hate, I don't think it is justifiable that I still can't upvote people here.
    – cregox
    Commented Feb 18, 2010 at 2:41
  • I'm struggling out of newbie status and I objected to seeing lots of questions downvoted without comment. A downvote for a first question seems very harsh, especially when English isn't your first language. A simple explanation: "Your English is too confusing to answer your question" or whatever would help a lot.
    – DavidHyogo
    Commented Jun 16, 2012 at 13:22
  • i think that asking questions on SO is more like a given skill by practice, rather than theory. a good minimun 10 "fail safe" questions to get a hang of things could be a nice solution and seperate spammers from newbies... Commented Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07

This is not very welcoming to new users who don't know about uservoice, or what is offtopic, or the unofficial FAQ.

How can we explain this to them when having discussions in the "answers" area is strongly discouraged? I say let 'em find out what this site is. It doesn't take long. And if getting voted down makes someone cry, then he shouldn't use this site at all (or Digg or Reddit or ...).

  • Agreed. Voting is what it is all about.
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 18:25
  • 9
    When you vote something down add a comment, why you've voted it down. This keeps the voting and tells the user, what he did wrong.
    – Yaba
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 20:17
  • Maybe a textbox to fill shows up whenever you downvote someone...
    – Seiti
    Commented Oct 31, 2008 at 20:46
  • 8
    -1 you're just saying, "Too bad for them, they should quit whining." and condoning a sink-or-swim attitude. Commented Aug 28, 2009 at 15:49

I think there is this inherent fear--perhaps a subconscious one learned after spending time on Digg, Reddit, Hacker News, and other similar community-run sites -- of a flood of new users decreasing the quality of posts on a site like this. If anything, such a fear dates back all the way to the Eternal September of Usenet, back in 1993.

This fear leads to an overreaction when people see what they think are junk questions posted by newer users -- whether the questions are simply offtopic, or perhaps trollish or ignorant, or perhaps highly subjective. People are afraid of the quality of the site being ruined by such things, and whether justified or not, they break out the downvotes in droves.

  • 6
    As well they should. If the content is not helpful, downvote it. That is the whole premise here.
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 18:26

I disagree. Voting down should be used judiciously but I think it's still important that it be used. I think the system already has enough built in protections in this regard. Down votes are costly to the voter (-1 rep) and have only a small effect on the rep of the target (-2 rep).

Not to pick on the author of the given example, but take a look at his user page. He's posted 1 question and 1 answer. His answer has 0 net votes and his question has -5 net down votes. Yet he has, just now, 47 total rep (which, incidentally, is enough to allow him to vote answers up or down, per his complaint/question). Given this I think it's a bit ridiculous to say that people voting his question down represents "being hard on him".


Note to some of us:

Some coders are childish and uncivil, as if what we're doing in this business is so darn important that shaming others is justified when we're even mildly annoyed.

You may disagree with someone. You may feel that they have stupidly blundered into the path of your high-speed expertise. But ask yourself:

  • Are they a bad person?

  • Have you never done something stupid?

  • Have you appreciated a helping hand?

We live in a world where some people murder other people over their beliefs. If someone has so much in common with you as to ask you a question, even if it's not a very smart question, do they deserve to be slammed? If you were asking, would you deserve it?

  • 2
    Good thoughts, Mike. I've just joined, and asked a question yesterday. A really basic one, because I'd forgotten where to find a list of class contents for Java. Googling had previously pointed me at the class "list", so didn't really help much. I was really pleased to get useful help within minutes, and not one unpleasant response. Just what a noob needs :-) Commented Apr 2, 2012 at 16:52

I just found this discussion right after being 'downed' at 'uservoice' question...

Hmm... I can express some feelings after this all:

  1. Being noob here doesn't mean being noob in computing and communities. It should be not a requirement to "lurk first - participate later". This is what noobs very often hear from nerds and pseudo-elites. Good site must accept anyone with positive mind from the first minute. And yes, normally 'lurking' applies to the sites with close-minded jerkish societies, which I hope is not a case here.

  2. It would be nice just to forbid down-voting newbe, especially when he has low reputation points yet.

  3. Yes, just a hint (in form of tags) would be nice to point newbe to right direction.

  4. Noob, just came to the site, sees questions-discussions-polls like "What the best features of X are" with high votes, and thinks this is legal on this site.

  5. I don't think this site is designed for elite members, so you should be more polite and forgiving to new members. Normally communities tend to be extending and this, I think, is a main goal. Otherwise so many noobs will leave your site for ever.

  6. Voting system isn't very well designed, you should admit it and try to make it even better. Sometimes noobs may give you good advise. (Sometimes - may not).

  7. There's something to do with question votes. I'm afraid, some people don't even realize that this is not a polling counter. :)

  8. Thank you for your attention.

  • 2
    As an addition: As I can understand, there could be 100s of potential down-voters, just threspassers, who even don't get the question, just down-voting because of snow-ball effect. Writing a note (better - an answer) from such voter would be good idea.
    – Thevs
    Commented Sep 18, 2008 at 19:31

Post first, ask questions later.

Maybe users should have to post an answer before they can post a question. Then they would have had to start using the site before they post bad questions.

I would almost go so far as to require users to post more answers than questions. Because as far as I can tell anyone who actually uses this site has answered more questions than they have asked.

  • 18
    If someone is a beginner (at programming), then it will probably be quite hard for them to first post an answer before they are allowed to ask questions.
    – M4N
    Commented Jan 22, 2009 at 22:35
  • This was posted to get people thinking about the subject in a new way. Commented Jan 23, 2009 at 5:32
  • I agree with Martin on this one. Answering questions here is difficult, especially for someone who is a bit newbish (I still am). Either you don't have a clue how to answer the question, or some crazy answering machine has answered it already (or does it while you are trying to formulate yours...).
    – Svish
    Commented Feb 22, 2009 at 17:36
  • (And I mean crazy answering machine in a good way. Hehe, I don't mind them being fast. It just makes it difficult for newbs to get an answer in before they have)
    – Svish
    Commented Feb 22, 2009 at 17:37
  • It was just a thought, I knew when I posted this that it wouldn't work without doing a lot of tweaking. Even then I'm doubtful that it would really be that useful. Commented Feb 23, 2009 at 5:20
  • 3
    The entire rationale for So is to be easily accessible, somewhere you can get your questiosn answered. It is no coincidence that you can ask questions without even creating an OpenID. Joel and Jeff have been very explicit about this. Anything that requires newcomers to jump through hoops before they're allowed to find the knowledge they need is completely missing the point. Your average newcomer doesn't come here because he wants to be part of a super-cool community, he does not wish to prove himself. He simply wants a question answered, and if he can't immediately ask that question, he's out.
    – jalf
    Commented May 12, 2009 at 19:13

I have to agree, although I've probably been short with a few, but how hard is it to search before you ask? I marked at least 8 posts as duplicates in just the last 2 hours.

  • Even worse is this constant barrage of poll questions...
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 18:17
  • Yah, in the 4 minutes since I posted that answer I have marked 3 more questions as duplicates, and if they had spent 30 seconds searching they would have found the post.
    – Unkwntech
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 18:20
  • I find that amazing, especially with the built in search box that automatically populates while you are on the post screen.
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 18:23
  • I agree, a quick search is a good idea, but "if you end up asking a question that has been asked before, that is OK and deliberately allowed" definitely means aside from introducing the user to the search function, there needn't be further scolding.
    – davebug
    Commented Sep 16, 2008 at 18:34
  • 9
    Your logic depends on the accuracy of search. I asked a question in the search box, came up with nothing even close, then posted the question. Later I found that there were similar answers, but the search left something to be desired.
    – mike511
    Commented Sep 17, 2008 at 3:13
  • 2
    @mike511 I totally agree, I had the same problem. Another issue is similar questions, but not exactly. They look similar whereas they are different. Sometimes this is overlooked and you get modded down for no reason.
    – Sklivvz
    Commented Sep 17, 2008 at 8:38
  • 4
    Certainly during the beta phase, the search was completely useless. Maybe we should stop blaming users for creating duplicates and start asking why the software does not work better to let people find what they are looking for?
    – John Channing
    Commented Sep 27, 2008 at 9:32

The growth of the community depends upon new users. New users to test the waters, grow the fields of discussion. I posted something I knew to be off-topic and got slammed. For new users, perhaps there should be a lower limit to the times any one question or comment can be down-voted. A reputation that was built in three days was destroyed in less than 5 minutes; just from trying to feel out the limits.

Obviously, the site isn't entirely programming but, if a question edges too far from this it gets raped.

Being pretentious, snobby, mean, and generally negative is not a way to build a helpful community.

  • Upvoted - because I can! Agreed, the depth of knowledge here is pretty thin. There is a wider range of knowledge and answers on the MSDN forums (for instance)
    – adolf garlic
    Commented Apr 21, 2009 at 7:16

Remember, we have all been n00bs. It has never hurt anyone to be polite.

On the other hand you would expect new (and old) users to do a little investigation before posting, and trying to see if the question already exists somewhere.

  • 10
    "... we have all been n00bs..." Incorrect. Jon Skeet. Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 10:26
  • 4
    @Wayne, nope. Jon's first answer includes a signature, and his first question is a poll. Granted, those things weren't against the rules back then, but... still.
    – Pops
    Commented Feb 15, 2011 at 20:14
  • @"Popular Demand": I was joking, obviously. Jon Skeet jokes are almost as old as Stack Overflow :) Commented Feb 15, 2011 at 23:36

I know I stopped dead in my tracks when I noticed that to post anything on uservoice I had to create yet another user account and that I couldn't even use my OpenID ID like I could on Stack Overflow.

I mean, if the websites are so closely related, wouldn't it make sense for them to behave in the same manner or even better to actually share the same user system?

As it stands, asking a question on UserVoice is more difficult than asking one on Stack Overflow and many people discover Stack Overflow directly and only see UserVoice later (if they even do). Given that, is it so surprising that people go for the easiest and just post their questions on Stack Overflow?

  • You don't have to register on Uservoice to post something there. The site works perfectly fine anonymously. Commented Sep 17, 2008 at 11:38
  • no, it doesn't - at least not for me Commented Sep 22, 2008 at 21:26

I'm a noob(ish) and I read the FAQ before I asked anything. I think RTFM is a reasonable request. I didn't come here to be spoon-fed.

This site is quite intuitive and there aren't any challenging new concepts to learn about how it operates so there is really not much excuse, apart from laziness, to use it as it is intended to be used.

Having said that, there's no excuse for rudeness. A simple "Please Read the FAQ" should suffice.

If that doesn't work there's always justfuckinggoogleit.com/


Wikipedia has a solution to such a problem. This is done by a nice short welcome message explaining the importance of a few rules, rather than simply pointing out the FAQs, and tons of best practices papers and guidelines it has. On top of this, whenever a user makes a mistake he is given a chance to correct it by opening a dispute page. Perhaps we can consider something like that here. If a question is a duplicate, give the user a chance to defend it and maybe even go so far as to stop downvotes on a disputed page? Because on Stack Overflow, once a question is disputed, downvotes seem to fly off faster than the speed of thought.

So what we need is a template for disputed content. A few such categories would be:

  • Duplicate
  • Belongs on UserVoice
  • Offtopic
  • Offensive
  • Read the FAQ (This tag might be too vague?).

Once a post gets tagged with any of the above tags, a small block explaining the details of such a tag should appear by default on the question itself with an automatic link to a resolution page where the community can vote and discuss it. If consensus is gained, the question can be deleted without getting voted down. This will preserve the reputation points of the user as well and this will make the responses of the question more clean, as right now the discussions on such disputed questions seem to be more about the dispute and less about the question. Just my 2 pyas.

  • 3
    Wikipedia's solution wouldn't work here. The entire point in SO is to be easily accessible. The ruling clique on Wikipedia have no problem keeping up with a few rules, but someone visiting SO for the first time to ask why his C program crashes will simply stay away if he can't just post his question directly. "What we need" is simply to not assault people with downvotes.
    – jalf
    Commented May 12, 2009 at 19:09

As Thevs said

Being noob here doesn't mean being noob in computing and communities.

I have only registered and asked my first question today. However, I am a senior developer (architect) with 21 years experience in numerous programming languages and technologies. I have found answers to other problems on this site and various others but never before needed to raise a new question. I have found that when Stack Overflow is listed first by Google, I get a warm feeling that the help will be of good quality so I chose Stack Overflow to raise my first question. However, I only ever search such sites for specific information. I don't browse sites otherwise. (I wouldn't be allowed to spend work time doing so and choose not to do so outside of work -this comment is an exception to prove the rule.)

Today, I had a problem that I needed to solve before leaving work. Having read the relevant formal documentation, experimented and googled for a few hours for related infomation, I raised a question on Stack Overflow.

I have to confess that pressure of my deadline meant that I did not spend any time working out what the various links and buttons on the question submission screen did, and I didn't find my way to any FAQ until later. I also found that my (employer dictated) Internet Explorer 6 did not display the question entry page properly - some fields displayed on top of each other. Somehow, although I quoted my sample code and could see that I had done so in the preview, after I had submitted my question, I found that the code was no longer quoted. Almost immediatly someone, commented rather abruptly that I'd failed to quote my code and voted my question down giving it a negative score. The commenter did not offer an answer or any advice on how to correct my presentation problem.

Shortly afterwards, some more helpful reader just quietly corrected the layout of my question.

Within a couple of hours my question had attracted more than 50 readers, 3 partial answers and a positive vote. One contributor tried to give a complete answer but someone else pointed out that he was wrong. Five hours later my question on a very common Java library remains unanswered, so I suspect it will prove to be a good question - I actually suspect a bug in the Sun libraries.

So my new user's view is as follows (and of course it is a subjective personal view):

  1. The links for edit|delete, the FAQ and other links are not as prominent as other buttons. In fact, even allowing for my Internet Explorer 6 problems, I find some of the screens messy. By that I mean buttons and links in different styles are scattered around the screen, and it is not obvious to a first time user where to look for a button or link or just find all the options available to them. For example, the link to the FAQ is in very small print at the bottom of the page but the button inviting users to submit questions, answers and comments is enormous.
  2. Standard comments from a drop down list (rather like FriendsReunited's messages) might help users to provide standard polite responses to the common errors made by new users.
  3. I'm happy for questions and answers to be voted up and down based on usefulness. However, since questions can be edited and the presentation improved, it would be nice if voting a question down because of poor presentation were discouraged and advice (or help with) improving presentation offered.
  4. My questions has only been half answered (sufficiently for a workaround but not a complete understanding). Even having read the FAQ, I'm unsure of the etiquette for updating my questions to ensure that it is clear to others that it is incomplete.
  • In response to #1, FAQ is in the header as well, next to the search bar. As for #4, I suggest that you upvote the answer that helped you the most, leaving a comment to that effect but also where it fell short. The lack of an accepted answer will indicate to other users that there is currently no sufficient answer as determined by you.
    – waiwai933
    Commented Jun 6, 2010 at 5:10
  • I only ever search such sites for specific information. I don't browse sites otherwise. (I wouldn't be allowed to spend work time doing so and choose not to do so outside of work -this comment is an exception to prove the rule.) I know I'm being childish for caring, but still this makes me feel that someone who's only taking, not giving, is whining about an established community that has been proven helpful to those who did invest some time getting to know things. (And also to many just passing by.) For me, a deadline is no excuse to just post a question without informing oneself.
    – Arjan
    Commented Jun 6, 2010 at 7:26
  • 2
    I personally felt the answers to your question were quite good. As for IE6, we don't guarantee perfect rendering for browsers that old any more. The site will be functional, but it may look odd. IE7 is the oldest version of IE we test on. Commented Jun 6, 2010 at 7:37
  • 1
    There do seem to be plenty of mean people in SO. Strange I've been using the net for more than 10 years and never felt this atmosphere before.
    – Noob101
    Commented Apr 10, 2014 at 14:51

Here is another very-new-noob who is experiencing (at least moderately) this same thing. I started by just wanting to be helpful. Then after realizing that I need reputation points to post comments, I started focusing on unanswered questions, hoping to get up-voted for helpful answers.

It seems like some people ask a question and then just forget to vote for any answers at all. I've even started learning concepts on the fly, to try and answer questions that I previously had no knowledge of (LINQ for example). I think I will stop trying this though.

I've done my best to follow the rules, make my posts meaningful and helpful, and not repost what others have already said (even though I have on a few occasions).

As of right now, the ONLY vote I have is a down-vote on an answer I provided that, at the time, I thought was a perfectly acceptable answer.

  • 1
    The easiest way to get upvotes is to continually watch the front page until you see a question that you can answer. Write up two or three sentences, include an example if possible, then post the answer. Then immediately edit your answer to clarify and extend your explanation. Try to also include examples of situations where your answer isn't valid. Keep refining and editing your answer to the best of your ability and you should see an upvote or two if your answer is clear and helpful. Commented Jun 21, 2009 at 21:21
  • One thing is what this question asks for ("being nicer") and the other is getting votes. You have 41 rep now, just wait and keep giving interesting answers and you'll soon be able to comment. Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 10:31
  • 1
    For increasing rep, there's the alternative that's a bit slow, but reasonably safe: skim through old questions (answered or not) and find some that you can provide solid useful material for. Upvotes will accrue on these, over time. :-) Commented Oct 21, 2018 at 9:40

When I started, I asked a couple of meta questions on Stack Overflow and people were nice about their answers. But, and I think this is an important point, I think the questions were NOT obvious and there was not a good place to get an answer to the question.

For example, I asked TODAY about how to get a better understanding of Stack Overflow and was directed to the "offical FAQ".

What I absolutely don't get is how come that official FAQ is not the page that new users see when click the FAQ link at the top of every page. I REALLY don't get it.

I wanted to learn, but I had to ask a question on Meta Stack Overflow to learn.

So until that is corrected, I think new users should be cut some slack. Not all of us are idiots or lazy.

And even the official FAQ needs work IMHO. I know it is a work in progress, but I am only arguing that patience with newbies should be the order of the day. That's what a community it; without it you don't have a community.


Stack Overflow is perfect the way it is.

It's not a place to "chill-out" and have fun. It's a place for programmers and software developers to share their skills and learn new skills.

There are plenty of other forums and tutorials to learn programming for starters. Stack Overflow simply isn't the place to start learning about programming.

As a general rule of thumb, if the concept of a stack overflow doesn't ring a bell for you, you might want to learn a bit more about programming before posting here.

  • 2
    Clarification? If someone is an experienced programmer, would it be OK if they ask a question about a language they're just learning? Or should they wait until they're expert in a language before asking a question about it?
    – Ethan
    Commented Jun 21, 2009 at 20:01
  • 2
    Programming languages all share a common concept base, so the experienced programmer doesn't really start from scratch when he learns a new language. Obviously, you can't wait to be an expert to start asking questions here... But you can do some reading before. In my previous post, I just said that this site should be for relatively experienced programmers and not complete newcomers. It's not discrimination: it simply sets the standard for question and answer quality higher. That's what I like about that site. It's not bloated with trivial questions.
    – Wadih M.
    Commented Jun 21, 2009 at 21:41
  • There's nothing in the site which prevents people from asking trivial questions, and certainly there are some beginners here. Probably not more because they just don't know the site, but not because of some explicit moderation or filtering rule. Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 10:34
  • 3
    Wadih, it says on the main FAQ, the one linked to from the top of this page you're looking at right now, in the answer to the very first question: "No question is too trivial or too 'newbie'". Your opinion regarding what the site "should be" appears to conflict sharply with the intention of the site's creators.
    – Ethan
    Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 17:36
  • 1
    Hi Ethan. I don't want to get into the technicalities, but note that what the FAQ says is about the 'questions asked', and not about the programmer himself. All what I said and what this topic is about pertains to the programmer, so my ideas don't conflicts sharply with the intention of the site's creators. Nonetheless, I thank you for tirelessly trying to prove me wrong and defending the rights of new programmers! I also encourage new programmers to learn, once they've done their homework of reading things up themselves. As long as their questions are relevant, they're welcome. :-)
    – Wadih M.
    Commented Jun 28, 2009 at 1:54
  • 1
    I started learning about programming here. Had fun most of times. Nothing perfect the way it is. Especially your approach. Commented Mar 26, 2014 at 13:30

I think Stack Overflow should really be strict regarding the quality of the submissions in this site.

Look at Digg now. They grew very very fast, and they didn't mind about the quality of the submissions and now look at where they are. Submissions are junk photos not related to NEWS whatsoever.

Compare this to Hacker News. They are very strict about the quality of the submissions. They have moderators who can down vote the article right away, they have complete control over the articles. They are growing fast. Very fast. But the submissions are still of high quality.

Let's see what's happening on Stack Overflow . Obviously this site is like Yahoo Answers but for coders. And let's be honest. Anyone can access this, not just coders.

Stack Overflow is growing super fast. And if Stack Overflow will tolerate the trolls, I'm afraid we will be heading to what Digg is now. Digg has high quality submissions + junk submissions that managed to get 5k+ diggs. If Stack Overflow tolerate trolls, Stack Overflow will still have high quality questions and answers + troll-like questions and answers that can also manage to have 100+ votes.

Let's follow what Hacker News is right now. Let's be like them.


New user here!

I just wanted to say that I haven't yet noticed any "noob-bashing" yet. I've asked a couple of questions already that probably have been asked before. The replies I have received have been prompt and informative.

If there indeed is a problem with established members of your "sandbox" being rude or elitist, I have not noticed it and am glad, because this would probably have made me turn away to another site that doesn't condone that sort of kindergarten tactic.

This site so far has been great, and so have the members! I'm glad there is a place I can come and post a question without having to be told to "read the #*($ manual" or "Use the search". Sometimes, what people need are just quick answers to help them along their way.

Is this lazy? That can be debated to no end. But is it helpful? Of course! And I hope to see this community thrive on that principle. There is no need for experienced programmers to feed their ego by kicking the noobs around. And I want to re-iterate that I'm glad it hasn't happened to me.

  • 7
    It's a lot easier to be nice when the newbies are polite. :)
    – mmyers
    Commented Jun 24, 2009 at 16:03
  • 1
    @nalas: out of curiosity, what's wrong with trying a search first for something simple and obvious ("What does XmlReader.Read do?"), or even looking in the documentation. I think SO can be a lot more useful if questioners take the first step. We can then help with the second step. Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 10:20
  • "Just wanted to say that I haven't yet noticed any "noob-bashing" yet." What a pile of BS! :) Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 10:23
  • 1
    @John SO allows duplicate questions. So isn't it easier for you just to choose to ignore these questions if it bothers you rather than bashing new users for asking them? I'm sure there are other users who are willing to answer promptly and politely.
    – natas
    Commented Jun 26, 2009 at 13:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .