Linked Questions

7
votes
1answer
224 views

Identified Suspected Robo-Reviewer. What now? [duplicate]

I have identified a suspected robo-reviewer. They are spending on average 4 seconds per review, they always select 'No Action Needed', and on a number of occassions, they have done this on obvious NAA ...
-6
votes
3answers
173 views

Badge suggestion: Attentive/Thorough

There seems to be a consensus that robo-upvoters are running rampant on Stack Overflow because of the Late Answer and First Post review queues. You've all seen it, spam that has been upvoted, ...
6
votes
1answer
162 views

Shouldn't there be any way of reviewing the edit reviews?

Sometimes my edits are rejected for no good reason. A good example is when I add a new major tag (like asp.net) to the question, and the edit is rejected for being a too minor edit. Adding an asp.net ...
-15
votes
1answer
185 views

Encourage people to pay attention while reviewing

Recently I saw a "No action needed" button in the review system, which I think is really good for stopping bad/fake upvotes from the people who are striving just for badges. Still they can ...
8
votes
1answer
133 views

Review Audit failed when “late answer” answer is a duplicate

I just got a review audit where the "late answer" was a duplicate of the accepted answer, but flagging it on that basis failed the review. That seems like a bug to me. Question here: Is it better to ...
6
votes
1answer
88 views

Old first post reviews on sites without audits enabled

This question was prompted by Review First post - Test reviews where often old first post reviews are possibly explained as being audit reviews. I believe audit reviews are only enabled on the larger ...
5
votes
1answer
220 views

Who audits the audit reviews?

I just failed an audit by not voting to reopen this SO question. But, IMHO, it's a poor fit for SO and should be closed. I wouldn't hesitate to close it if I stumbled upon it as "off topic" or maybe ...
9
votes
1answer
88 views

Constantly voting not like others in review queues

Are there any rules against constantly voting not like others in review queues? If yes, do the rules apply only to sites where they are enforced by the engine, in the form of review audits*, or are ...
-9
votes
2answers
206 views

How are privilege abuses after quick rep gain by new users being avoided?

Bob, on his first day, asks a question on a site, and it goes viral. It gets lots of upvotes. Reasons of virality can be some update in a new tool or it can be a common query like Why is processing a ...
15
votes
1answer
120 views

Reopen Votes review audits use old JS confirm dialog instead of new Stacks prompt, making them too easy to identify

If I vote to reopen a question that appeared on the Reopen Votes queue and it turns out that it is an audit, I get this JS browser confirmation dialog: But if it is not an audit, then I get this ...
0
votes
1answer
169 views

Some questions on how the review algorithms work exactly

I would like to know how the review algorithm 'decides' that a late post need to be reviewed. When a user fails a review audit, he gets this: If the same user failed too many review audits, he gets ...
5
votes
1answer
91 views

Gotcha's in Close Vote queue are sometimes too subjective [duplicate]

Let me start out by saying that I do my best to give every question due diligence in the Close Votes queue. However, every now and then, Stack Overflow likes to throw in a gotcha question to make sure ...
7
votes
1answer
188 views

Failed review ban - 30 day window - clarification please

I found an explanation of the duration of the review bans after failed audits in the answer to this question The time of automatic review bans should be increased with every new ban each review ban ...
4
votes
2answers
103 views

This isn't question and I failed the audit when closing it

I am confused as to why I failed this audit. I voted to close it as unclear what you are asking because it's not even a question. It's a statement (and a bit of a complaint about how a language works)...
12
votes
1answer
122 views

Review audit honeypot messes with tags; leads to wrong comments left

This question showed up in the close review queue for C++: I was leaving a comment as to the inappropriateness of the c++ tag for this question, when I went to the question and found this: The ...

15 30 50 per page
1
3 4
5
6 7