Questions tagged [creative-commons]
The Creative Commons license allows the distribution of copyrighted works. Use this tag for questions on how the Stack Exchange network makes use of the CC-license.
127
questions
3
votes
1
answer
258
views
Does the Share-alike clause of the content license mean software code content can't be used other than in open-source software?
Does the current applicability of the CC-BY-SA 4.0 to most Stack Overflow content actually mean that one can only embed (or adapt) code content from Stack Overflow in their own software if they make ...
- 251
4
votes
1
answer
142
views
Posting content under licenses besides CC BY-SA 4.0
If I post content (authored by me) on an SE site, and I have released it under some license X, how does this work with the SE TOS (even though it links to SO I assume it's applicable to all sites ...
- 25.9k
20
votes
3
answers
376
views
How do we make sure that contributors get the credit and attribution they deserve when their work is used for training AI models?
I have read the blog post about Community is the future of AI and I could not find any serious answer to this question.
Here is the way I see it: The knowledge in Stack Exchange (and Stack Overflow in ...
- 301
20
votes
0
answers
197
views
Will SE tell us if they sell our content?
So, the CEO of Stack Exchange has been quoted in a news article saying that they plan to sell the content of the SE network to large companies training neural networks like the one used for ChatGPT. ...
- 185k
29
votes
2
answers
532
views
Can SE just resell our data, relicense it and remove the attribution requirement?
SE has decided to charge for the network content when used for training AI according to an article. This has not been officially announced here, so we do not know the details.
But the main question to ...
- 185k
7
votes
1
answer
104
views
How far do we need to go with unattributed images? [duplicate]
The CC licensing requires attribution for any content that isn't your own, including images. People often post unattributed clarifying images copied from somewhere else. It is clear from the post that ...
- 7,219
1
vote
0
answers
68
views
YouTube channel scraping Q&A from Stack Exchange [duplicate]
There is this horrible YouTube channel scraping Q&A from Stack Exchange without attribution to the author of either question or answers, and no links to the original post.
Stack Exchange licenses ...
- 165
8
votes
1
answer
109
views
License link on SEDE archive page points to wrong BY-SA version
On the Stack Exchange Data Explorer Help page, there is a link to the Internet Archive page. On the Stack Exchange Archive page, there is a section for licensing, with the following description:
All ...
- 38.3k
2
votes
0
answers
85
views
How to give attribution when using the same code on multiple webpages [closed]
I am very new to the Stack Overflow community. I noticed that there are several excellent answers here that can help me to build a website. I am a little bit aware of the License CC BY-SA 4.0 applied ...
- 129
11
votes
1
answer
229
views
CC BY-SA in footer should be capitalized
The footer currently has cc by-sa written in small case but it should be capitalized as CC BY-SA following the style used in the official Creative Commons page, the Help Center, and one of the ...
-2
votes
2
answers
165
views
Are the private-beta sites also under Creative Common license?
The SE questions/answers are under the CC BY-SA license (ref).
Does it also include the beta sites that are still in the private stage?
--> If yes, isn't there a contradiction between this license ...
- 386
3
votes
1
answer
116
views
What happens to the content of a SE site that has been closed?
The SE questions/answers are under the CC BY-SA license (ref). When a beta site does not make it and is closed, what happens to its content? Is it lost forever or is there a way to access the CC BY-SA ...
- 386
17
votes
1
answer
404
views
Can I make a YouTube video adapting Stack Overflow content?
There are many interesting questions on Stack Overflow, that have many good answers and many good comments. I want to make an animated YouTube video about a question and some answers to help visual ...
- 273
-7
votes
1
answer
146
views
Why does my comment show 41 "license: CC by SA 4.0"? Are all comments protected under copyright?
Why does my comment show this?
41 license: CC by SA 4.0
Are all comments protected under "creative commons" copyright? What does 41 mean? Why not 1 license - why 41?
- 15
9
votes
0
answers
61
views
Use the localized SE site's language for links to the Creative Commons' licensing pages
Any post timeline contains a link to the Creative Commons' license pages. For modern posts, it is https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/. As far as I see, there are many different languages ...
- 65.9k
7
votes
3
answers
219
views
Site footer copyright scope and meaning
The footer on every page (except chat) says:
site design / logo © 2021 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. rev 2021.5.28.39383
Does this mean only the site design and ...
- 718
5
votes
1
answer
171
views
Can I reuse and republish code snippets from Stack Exchange sites under a new license?
I want to start a project, Scheme Cookbook, with a better license because an old cookbook, that is no longer available online, was licensed under LGPL, which requires the inclusion of the license with ...
- 265
-10
votes
1
answer
187
views
Do users have right to not allow redistribution of their posts?
In my understanding, the CC BY-SA 4.0 license allows me to redistribute any material posted in Stack Exchange, as long as I put a link back to the original post. Does that mean a user has a right to ...
- 5,935
16
votes
2
answers
193
views
Is moving self-answers in questions into separate answers under the Community user valid under CC BY-SA?
Prompted by my question at How best to deal with self-answers edited into questions? which was somewhat answered with a link to What to do when OP answers his/her own question in an edit?, which then ...
- 4,106
7
votes
0
answers
174
views
Just to clarify the attribution requirements
When a question or answer was posted under one license (e.g. CC BY-SA 3.0), and edited under a different license (e.g. CC BY-SA 4.0), who should be credited as the "author" for attribution ...
- 1,646
3
votes
0
answers
57
views
Stack Exchange Data Dumps still indicating old attribution requirements
The Stack Exchange Data Dumps still contain wording mandating that attribution be given in specific ways, going beyond the Creative Commons licensing requirements:
Specifically the attribution ...
- 217
3
votes
0
answers
109
views
Stack Exchange copyright - where should we give attribution?
I know that code from the Stack Exchange sites is licensed under Creative Commons BY-SA.
So if I use code from Stack Exchange sites, attribution is required (as mentioned in this article).
How ...
user664016
15
votes
0
answers
244
views
Does the dual license in the pre-2018 Terms of Service allow SE to permit others to redistribute subscriber content outside of CC BY-SA?
I was reading around the topic of the precise details of subscriber-content licensing on SE, and I found (and read more carefully than the previous times I'd seen it) this thread on FOSS.SE from 2017, ...
- 19.4k
5
votes
2
answers
308
views
Is it OK to license content under "the latest version of CC BY-SA at the time being"?
So... we've all seen the recent chaos caused by the license change from CC 3.0 to CC 4.0, and it's foreseeable that a similar disaster will occur when changing again to a future version of CC (4.1 or ...
53
votes
4
answers
1k
views
How do I get my content on Stack Exchange licensed correctly or else removed?
I do not agree to my old content being relicensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 (it is not the same as 3.0).
Stack Exchange is not the owner of my contributions and is not allowed to change the license without ...
- 6,515
18
votes
1
answer
215
views
The mobile version of the website does not show the license along with the contributions
The contributors license their work with a creative commons license and more specifically "cc by-sa". This means that the if anybody, e.g. SE, wants to use the work of a contributor then they need to ...
- 6,515
0
votes
2
answers
137
views
SEDE help page still links to version 3.0 of Creative Commons license
Related to the post : SEDE footer still links to version 3.0 of Creative Commons license.
In the Stack Exchange Data Explorer help page, currently the Creative Commons license is referred with ...
- 38.3k
21
votes
1
answer
248
views
Does a third party deleting an account that still has posts violate CC BY-SA 4.0?
According to Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license, you need to retain the name of the creator when sharing licensed material.
If You Share the Licensed Material (...
15
votes
0
answers
237
views
License violation [duplicate]
The CC BY-CA 4.0 states
Section 3 – License Conditions.
Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.
a. Attribution.
If You Share ...
- 860
142
votes
1
answer
2k
views
What gives SE the legal right, under the CC-BY-SA license, to modify user profiles without indicating that the content has changed?
The Terms of Service clearly indicated that all content that you provide to SO Inc is licensed under CC-BY-SA, and that would include your About Me section of your user profile, which SO Inc is ...
user287266
15
votes
1
answer
1k
views
As a workaround to Imgur being blocked, is there a image hosting site which allows URL uploads and does not violate CC BY-SA 4.0 copyright?
Imgur is blocked in China (and probably in some other countries as well as many workplaces and educational institutions). This is annoying for Chinese users and Chinese.SE in particular.
Workaround: ...
- 21.6k
11
votes
1
answer
249
views
SEDE footer still links to version 3.0 of Creative Commons license
According to Stack Exchange and Stack Overflow have moved to CC BY-SA 4.0, subscriber content is now licensed under version 4.0 of the Creative Commons license. The change is reflected in the footer ...
GlorfindelMod
- 248k
57
votes
7
answers
2k
views
Why do people object to the license change so strongly despite having preference towards the proposed new license (CC 4)?
I noticed that many are happy to have their content (questions and answers) published under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, which was proposed recently, but received a great backlash.
The last time ...
51
votes
2
answers
916
views
Can one take the entire Q&A base and move it to a new site?
In the light of all recent moderators and experienced users quitting, I was wondering if anyone is allowed to take the entire Q&A set of a site, and move it to a new site, with new rules?
I think ...
- 91.6k
16
votes
0
answers
551
views
Has anyone sued SE for changing licensing? [closed]
There seems to be a lot of current drama flowing from the post Stack Exchange and Stack Overflow are moving to CC BY-SA 4.0 and related activities.
It seems like some authors who published under 3.0 ...
- 6,637
259
votes
2
answers
6k
views
Will concerns regarding the move to CC BY-SA 4.0 elicit any further dialogue from Stack Exchange, Inc.?
Fifteen days ago, it was suddenly announced that the user-contributed content on Stack Exchange had been relicensed as CC BY SA 4.0.
The change took immediate and retroactive effect and is still in ...
-452
votes
24
answers
98k
views
Stack Exchange and Stack Overflow have moved to CC BY-SA 4.0
Effective today, all Subscriber Content on Stack Overflow and the Stack Exchange network will be available under the terms of version 4.0 of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) ...
- 181k
0
votes
0
answers
34
views
Apply license on data used from answers on Stack Exchange sites [duplicate]
I have used some answers from Stack Exchange sites, with desire to republish it. I have prepared some work (something similar to blogpost) from answers of different 3-4 users. How can I properly apply ...
- 111
2
votes
0
answers
621
views
When and how to give attribution to code snippets from Stack Overflow
I want to understand when do I need to give attribution to code snippets from Stack Overflow.
Do I need to give attribution when I use code snippets in a blog post (by a blog post I mean a tutorial)
...
- 21
1
vote
0
answers
41
views
Is content on SE licensed under CC-BY-SA v3 or v4 now? [duplicate]
The footer on the website says CC-BY-SA 3.0:
However the terms and conditions page link to CC-BY-SA 4.0:
So which one is it now officially? V3 or V4?
- 2,834
36
votes
1
answer
880
views
Are we allowed according to the ToS to exempt a part of our post from the CC license?
tl;dr: Right now we are not allowed to quote outside sources (unless they are compatible with cc by-sa 4.0) or use images under fair use exceptions in our posts. Creative Commons provides guidance how ...
- 2,054
18
votes
0
answers
405
views
Make it clear that you need to have the right to license any pictures under CC BY-SA
tl;dr: Right now we're not allowed to upload any images we don't own (fair use does not apply on this site, see the link). Let's make this a bit clearer in the image upload form.
When you try to ...
- 2,054
11
votes
2
answers
1k
views
EU's article 13 will heavily censor the web. Should we do something?
Creative Commons is against article 13:
It’s an extreme dragnet that will harm creativity and fundamental rights. Delete it.
GitHub, Debian, LibreOffice, SUSE, KDE are against it.
[It] ...
- 2,983
17
votes
0
answers
123
views
When adding image from Wikimedia Commons, automatically add author/license/link
Many Stack Exchange questions and answers embed images from Wikimedia Commons. It is probably the most used image source here.
The good news
Thanks to their license, all images from Wikimedia Commons ...
- 2,446
1
vote
0
answers
38
views
The TOS and footer refer to different CC BY-SA license versions [duplicate]
As previously reported, the TOS links to version 4, but the footer and Help Centre to version 3. The TOS should I think say the version number in the text as well, rather than only in the link.
In ...
- 18.6k
7
votes
1
answer
135
views
Can the "attribution required" link please be removed from the footer and help page?
The footer of all SE sites links to a blog post called Attribution Required. It is also linked to in the Help Centre.
As has been covered previously, this so-called requirement to give attribution in ...
- 18.6k
1
vote
1
answer
364
views
Is it legal for Stack Exchange to decline post dissociation requests on non-deleted posts?
Note: Not a duplicate of Is a refusal to disassociate deleted posts in compliance with the CC BY-SA license?. As its title says, that question has to do with the case where the post involved was ...
24
votes
0
answers
210
views
Does Amazon Alexa use Stack Exchange content, and if so, is it done legally?
According to the Stack Exchange content license (CC-BY-SA), uses of content on Stack Exchange sites must be properly attributed.
However, I have noticed Amazon Alexa (accessed using an Echo device) ...
- 341
5
votes
1
answer
45
views
Can I get Correct SE attribution from Data Explorer
I'd like to get titles (only) from various SE sites for my writer's prompts website.
I cannot see how to use SE Data Explorer queries to get the required information.
From the Attribution page I see ...
- 153
19
votes
1
answer
981
views
Does archival interfere with attribution removal?
There was a question asking about CC BY-SA 3.0's requirement to remove attribute on request. It was brought up that automatic archives may still preserve historical information, including attribution ...
