Questions tagged [creative-commons]
The Creative Commons license allows the distribution of copyrighted works. Use this tag for questions on how the Stack Exchange network makes use of the CC-license.
65
questions
171
votes
1
answer
14k
views
How do I remove my name from a post, in accordance with CC BY-SA?
The Creative Commons FAQ states that:
Third, if the licensor does not like how the material has been modified or used, CC licenses require that the licensee remove the attribution information upon ...
-452
votes
24
answers
98k
views
Stack Exchange and Stack Overflow have moved to CC BY-SA 4.0
Effective today, all Subscriber Content on Stack Overflow and the Stack Exchange network will be available under the terms of version 4.0 of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) ...
- 181k
-342
votes
60
answers
96k
views
A New Code License: The MIT, this time with Attribution Required
Update: January 15, 2016
Thank you for your patience and feedback. The changes proposed here have been delayed indefinitely - we'll be back later to open some more discussions.
Important context for ...
- 5,210
542
votes
58
answers
99k
views
The MIT License – Clarity on Using Code on Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange
Update (Dec. 22, 2015): Thanks, everyone, for your feedback to this proposal. We're going to digest this one over the holidays and should have a follow-up announcement answering your questions and ...
- 5,210
67
votes
5
answers
29k
views
What is up with the source code license on Stack Overflow? [duplicate]
I know this has been asked several times. I've read the responses. I'm still very confused.
What are the legal requirements for using samples from SO in other projects? If there are requirements, ...
- 781
38
votes
6
answers
1k
views
Dealing with posts plagiarising from copyrighted sources
What means do users have to report plagiarism or posting of copyrighted work?
A button to flag content as plagiarism would be useful. It's not quite "offensive," and should probably have a different ...
- 481
23
votes
2
answers
730
views
"Attribution Required" misses requirement to reference the license [duplicate]
The license info in the footer of every Stack Exchange page contains a link to the blog post Attribution Required. In this post, Jeff Atwood explains what the attribution is required to contain.
...
- 3,062
40
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Stack Exchange should stop using the Creative Commons logo [duplicate]
If I understand correctly, SE reproduces its user-produced content using a CC-BY-SA license with additional restrictions: namely, from point 3 of the TOS,
In the event that You post or otherwise use ...
- 3,942
259
votes
2
answers
6k
views
Will concerns regarding the move to CC BY-SA 4.0 elicit any further dialogue from Stack Exchange, Inc.?
Fifteen days ago, it was suddenly announced that the user-contributed content on Stack Exchange had been relicensed as CC BY SA 4.0.
The change took immediate and retroactive effect and is still in ...
- 34.9k
47
votes
2
answers
681
views
Could we have a Help Center page on disassociating posts?
As a moderator I sometimes1 find myself needing to explain disassociation to a user, usually one who has tried to delete posts that he's belatedly realized are connected to him. It'd sure be handy if ...
- 182k
35
votes
3
answers
913
views
Are the SE additions to the Creative Commons attribution requirements enforceable? [duplicate]
In the footer of Stack Exchange sites, it is stated that user contributions are licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 with a contradictory and incompatible attribution requirement addendum.
The “attribution ...
- 475
25
votes
3
answers
636
views
By posting a selection of previously written text here, are we waiving our copyrights to the excerpt?
Posts on Stack Exchange sites have a Creative Commons license applied. However, on Writers, people will post snippets of their own writing for critique purposes. Does that mean that if I post a ...
- 2,380
20
votes
0
answers
616
views
What licence is subscriber content provided under 4.0, 3.0 or them all?
In the footer it says:
site design / logo © 2018 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required. rev 2018.8.7.31273
However, in the footer under ...
- 3,627
12
votes
1
answer
553
views
Legal page says user content is under cc-by-sa-3.0, but other pages say cc-by-sa-2.5
The legal page has two references to "the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike license," and both of them link to cc-by-sa version 3.0.
However, the bottom of every page links to version ...
- 677
10
votes
1
answer
900
views
Should Stack Exchange switch to CC BY-SA 3.0? [duplicate]
Currently, Stack Exchange sites use the CC BY-SA 2.5 license.
There's a lot of content (not the least of which is Wikipedia) under the newer 3.0 version of this license.
Content licensed under 2.5 ...
- 4,487
76
votes
6
answers
919
views
What is "code" for the purposes of the proposed MIT license switchover? [closed]
A follow up from my comment about the new license announcement and samthebrand's response (also from the new license change attempt):
The proposed new licensing terms differentiate between code and ...
12
votes
2
answers
297
views
Is proper attribution given when a moderator edits someone's comment?
As far as I know according to CC BY-SA 3.0 if someone edits any question/answer of a user then proper attribution is given that someone edited such and such content at say 12 P.M 1 January 2015. The ...
- 418
142
votes
1
answer
2k
views
What gives SE the legal right, under the CC-BY-SA license, to modify user profiles without indicating that the content has changed?
The Terms of Service clearly indicated that all content that you provide to SO Inc is licensed under CC-BY-SA, and that would include your About Me section of your user profile, which SO Inc is ...
user287266
37
votes
2
answers
839
views
Are these eBooks that copy from SE illegal?
So, this guy has made a bunch of eBooks based on Stack Exchange content. Making books of SE stuff is okay, but two rules need to be followed:
Attribution
License the work under CC-BY-SA as well
This ...
- 1,524
29
votes
2
answers
532
views
Can SE just resell our data, relicense it and remove the attribution requirement?
SE has decided to charge for the network content when used for training AI according to an article. This has not been officially announced here, so we do not know the details.
But the main question to ...
- 185k
18
votes
3
answers
465
views
Why don’t we call our licence by name?
Why does Stack Exchange use this weird “cc-wiki” euphemism instead of calling the CC-BY-SA by its real name?
This is a bug report disguised as a question. As in: please fix the footer.
- 818
13
votes
4
answers
7k
views
Is copy-pasting code from Stack Overflow an infringement to CC BY-SA 3.0 or is it considered fair use?
Actually CC BY-SA 3.0 is a license which looks pretty good for most Stack Exchange Network sites, but on Stack Overflow which is used mainly for coding questions, is pretty much rigid since a lot of ...
- 273
53
votes
3
answers
2k
views
EU copyright laws (2018-2019). Any risk for Stack Exchange?
The European Parliament JURI committee will be voting on 20th June 2018 on reforms of the EU copyright laws (full law proposal). According to a Creative Commons article titled 'Act now to stop the EU’...
- 2,983
36
votes
1
answer
879
views
Are we allowed according to the ToS to exempt a part of our post from the CC license?
tl;dr: Right now we are not allowed to quote outside sources (unless they are compatible with cc by-sa 4.0) or use images under fair use exceptions in our posts. Creative Commons provides guidance how ...
- 2,054
32
votes
12
answers
1k
views
A New Code License: the Community Edition
Okay, so that proposal didn't go very well...
Clearly, the community thinks Stack Overflow, Inc messed up with their license proposal. Now it is time to you to prove we, as a community, can do better....
- 91.6k
28
votes
1
answer
324
views
Why separate code and non-code licensing?
The rationale for the license change proposals is at least somewhat clear: i.e. to reduce legal concerns of using code from answers in software that may use incompatible licenses. However, what seems ...
- 587
18
votes
1
answer
337
views
Do I have to give attribution to SO when using my own content elsewhere?
Content on SE sites is licensed under CC-BY-SA.
If I write a question/answer on your sites, do I still have copyright of the text I entered or does SE now hold all copyright to it? Can I put an ...
- 4,005
17
votes
0
answers
122
views
When adding image from Wikimedia Commons, automatically add author/license/link
Many Stack Exchange questions and answers embed images from Wikimedia Commons. It is probably the most used image source here.
The good news
Thanks to their license, all images from Wikimedia Commons ...
- 2,446
15
votes
1
answer
1k
views
As a workaround to Imgur being blocked, is there a image hosting site which allows URL uploads and does not violate CC BY-SA 4.0 copyright?
Imgur is blocked in China (and probably in some other countries as well as many workplaces and educational institutions). This is annoying for Chinese users and Chinese.SE in particular.
Workaround: ...
- 21.6k
5
votes
2
answers
232
views
Publishing a book - "Best programming Q&A" from SO contents?
Is it possible to publish a book made entirely out of SO questions and answers?
The idea is to publish the book freely online, and to sell kindle and printed copies on Amazon.com. Proper attribution ...
- 2,555
-1
votes
2
answers
153
views
Will we be able to use code from Wikipedia after the Licensing change?
Will we be able to use code snippets from Wikipedia after this proposal is implemented?
Of course, we don't use code snippets from Wikipedia that often. I was just wondering.
- 1,524
-14
votes
2
answers
446
views
Is a refusal to disassociate deleted posts in compliance with the CC BY-SA license? [closed]
I asked Stack Exchange staff to remove attribution on some of my deleted answers.
They suggested I delete my account to remove attribution. I have asked them if they will restore attribution on other ...
user369690
44
votes
7
answers
2k
views
How can I keep Stack Overflow clones out of my Google search results?
What is the best way to keep the various Stack Overflow clones and aggregators out of my Google search results?
Sites that are not to be named; I'm looking at you.
They are seriously messing up my ...
- 549
40
votes
4
answers
2k
views
CC-by-SA vs MIT - The 2016 battle
Stack Exchange is announcing the change from CC-BY-SA 3.0 to MIT License and the chaos has emerged.
After a few hours of research, I've concluded that I've been breaking the law (license) since the ...
17
votes
1
answer
401
views
Can I make a YouTube video adapting Stack Overflow content?
There are many interesting questions on Stack Overflow, that have many good answers and many good comments. I want to make an animated YouTube video about a question and some answers to help visual ...
- 273
15
votes
0
answers
243
views
Does the dual license in the pre-2018 Terms of Service allow SE to permit others to redistribute subscriber content outside of CC BY-SA?
I was reading around the topic of the precise details of subscriber-content licensing on SE, and I found (and read more carefully than the previous times I'd seen it) this thread on FOSS.SE from 2017, ...
- 19.4k
11
votes
1
answer
249
views
SEDE footer still links to version 3.0 of Creative Commons license
According to Stack Exchange and Stack Overflow have moved to CC BY-SA 4.0, subscriber content is now licensed under version 4.0 of the Creative Commons license. The change is reflected in the footer ...
GlorfindelMod
- 248k
11
votes
1
answer
8k
views
Code at Stackoverflow under any license? [duplicate]
Possible Duplicate:
Do I have to worry about copyright issues for code posted on StackOverflow?
A very basic doubt: the answers that are quoted on SO, do they come under any license?
Is it OK(/...
10
votes
2
answers
354
views
When SE unilaterally alters an author's name to "user123xxx", isn't it breaching its licence?
A user recently left English.SE in dissatisfaction with other users' behaviour, and he asked SE to delete both his English.SE account and all of the work he had posted to that subsite. But while SE ...
user314825
10
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Is Stack Overflow's use of Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (cc-wiki) viral?
The Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license that all Stack Overflow contributions are licensed under states:
Share Alike — If you alter,
transform, or build upon this work,
you may ...
- 201
8
votes
2
answers
235
views
Do images have to be quoted to meet CC BY-SA 3.0?
So I have this Aviation.SE question about an XKCD comic. I included the image, as well as a proper link back to the XKCD site (a similar question does the same).
I've had a user attempt multiple ...
- 26.3k
6
votes
1
answer
412
views
Data Dump torrent required attribution?
I see in the monthly creative commons data dump these files:
content\Export-100110.7z
ClearBits.txt
Description.txt
License.txt
However the license.txt only says
http://creativecommons.org/...
- 156
5
votes
1
answer
99
views
Attribution Required for non-web media
I read the blog post "Attribution Required" by Jeff Atwood. As I understand the post, SE "require[s]" that reusers "Hyperlink directly to the original question", that ...
- 1,503
1
vote
1
answer
362
views
Is it legal for Stack Exchange to decline post dissociation requests on non-deleted posts?
Note: Not a duplicate of Is a refusal to disassociate deleted posts in compliance with the CC BY-SA license?. As its title says, that question has to do with the case where the post involved was ...
51
votes
2
answers
916
views
Can one take the entire Q&A base and move it to a new site?
In the light of all recent moderators and experienced users quitting, I was wondering if anyone is allowed to take the entire Q&A set of a site, and move it to a new site, with new rules?
I think ...
- 91.6k
20
votes
2
answers
979
views
Does SE need to switch to CC-BY-SA 4.0?
User contributions to Stack Exchange sites are licensed under Creative Commons; share alike, with attribution required. The version is 3.0, see cc-wiki in the footer.
However, the most current ...
- 1,812
19
votes
1
answer
979
views
Does archival interfere with attribution removal?
There was a question asking about CC BY-SA 3.0's requirement to remove attribute on request. It was brought up that automatic archives may still preserve historical information, including attribution ...
18
votes
0
answers
405
views
Make it clear that you need to have the right to license any pictures under CC BY-SA
tl;dr: Right now we're not allowed to upload any images we don't own (fair use does not apply on this site, see the link). Let's make this a bit clearer in the image upload form.
When you try to ...
- 2,054
18
votes
1
answer
215
views
The mobile version of the website does not show the license along with the contributions
The contributors license their work with a creative commons license and more specifically "cc by-sa". This means that the if anybody, e.g. SE, wants to use the work of a contributor then they need to ...
- 6,515
16
votes
2
answers
511
views
How can we avoid the pitfalls of CreativeCommons in code snippets?
Creative Commons is a great license for a wiki, but it's not a good software license at all. Is it the case that all code snippets are under the same license as the rest of the text? I commonly say "...
- 1,689