Skip to main content

Questions tagged [licensing]

Questions about the licensing of content on Stack Exchange sites.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
-5 votes
0 answers
31 views

Preparing for the company to breach the terms of the CC-BY-SA license

I am expecting that at some point in the future and possibly quite soon, the company will breach the terms of the CC-BY-SA licence that I grant to them as a content creator. As is my right, when this ...
user9517's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
116 views

Do I own and retain all rights (copyright) to all the content posted on my profile page? [duplicate]

Does the 'public Network' include content on the profile page such as the profile picture and display name? Does the answer to Do I have to give attribution to SO when using my own content elsewhere? ...
JCr's user avatar
  • 31
-20 votes
3 answers
356 views

If I delete my answers from SO (as of 12 May 2024), is it too late for Prosus to give them to OpenAI? What's the situation with deleted answers?

In the Prosus-OpenAI deal, what is the situation with deleted answers, please? Can / will deleted answers be given to OpenAI to use as training?
Fattie's user avatar
  • 345
34 votes
10 answers
2k views

Why are people so unhappy about the OpenAI partnership? Am I missing something?

I'm reading the answers at Our Partnership with OpenAI, and a lot of people seem very unhappy about the partnership. I feel violated, cheated upon, betrayed, and exploited. And so on. But... why? ...
HolyBlackCat's user avatar
  • 5,208
40 votes
2 answers
944 views

How do I remove my contributions from Stack Exchange, in the event of a license violation?

Stack Exchange is now partnering with OpenAI. While the company has received a commitment from OpenAI that attribution will be maintained, and the company has not relicensed our contributions (as of ...
wizzwizz4's user avatar
  • 21.7k
12 votes
1 answer
222 views

I want to use content from a Stack Overflow / Stack Exchange question and answer. How do I comply with the Attribution requirements?

One of the requirements of the CC BY-SA license used for content on the Network is Attribution. What does proper attribution look like for questions and answers found on the Network?
Thomas Owens's user avatar
49 votes
1 answer
1k views

YouTube Channels Stealing SE Network Content

Although this has been reported before (1, 2), and the current canonical guidance for how to approach sites or scrapers copying SE content is also available, I wanted to share information that I have ...
Thomas Owens's user avatar
11 votes
3 answers
376 views

How should I inform a user I'm using their answer in a book?

I used my popular question Do Projects Ever End Early? as the basis of a book I wrote. (Available for free, for a limited time, here.) What is the appropriate protocol to inform the 14 users whose ...
Danny Schoemann's user avatar
20 votes
2 answers
372 views

Are Stack Exchange blog articles also under Creative Common license?

Recently I stumbled on the site of an IT company that replicated the entire article "Do large language models know what they are talking about?" with attribution. For basic content on the ...
SPArcheon - on strike's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
194 views

Does linked content count as "Subscriber Content" under the TOS?

The SE TOS defines "Subscriber Content" as: any and all content, including without limitation any and all text, graphics, logos, tools, photographs, images, illustrations, software or ...
Jason C's user avatar
  • 26k
4 votes
1 answer
151 views

Posting content under licenses besides CC BY-SA 4.0

If I post content (authored by me) on an SE site, and I have released it under some license X, how does this work with the SE TOS (even though it links to SO I assume it's applicable to all sites ...
Jason C's user avatar
  • 26k
14 votes
2 answers
991 views

Is SE in violation of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license by not providing data dumps?

SE is no longer providing data dumps for the content contributed by their users. CC BY-SA 4.0 states: No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally ...
CharonX's user avatar
  • 1,041
40 votes
0 answers
226 views

Stopping data dumps to "protect data" - harmful and threatening to the community

I find it a bit odd that "senior leadership is working on a strategy to protect Stack Overflow data from being misused by companies building LLMs", but historically has only cared about ...
Thomas Owens's user avatar
46 votes
2 answers
1k views
+100

How can SE gate access to the Dump that will allow individuals access to the data while preventing "misuse" by for-profit organizations?

I read this answer written by Jody Bailey: We are looking for ways to gate access to the Dump, APIs, and SEDE, that will allow individuals access to the data while preventing misuse by organizations ...
Franck Dernoncourt's user avatar
19 votes
0 answers
201 views

Will SE tell us if they sell our content?

So, the CEO of Stack Exchange has been quoted in a news article saying that they plan to sell the content of the SE network to large companies training neural networks like the one used for ChatGPT. ...
Mad Scientist's user avatar
19 votes
1 answer
689 views

When did Stack Exchange start to dual-license user content?

Stack Exchange currently dual-licenses user content, which allows them to sell user content without attributing users. When did the dual-licensing start? The Wayback Machine's first save of the ToS ...
Franck Dernoncourt's user avatar
12 votes
1 answer
338 views

Is SE legally allowed to sell user content for AI model training despite the fact that some of this content is not allowed to be used to train AIs?

SE Inc. wants to sell our content to some companies for AI training. However, some of our content is not allowed to be used to train AIs. E.g., since ChatGPT hasn't been banned on all SE sites, some ...
Franck Dernoncourt's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
290 views

If a company makes a commercial use of an AI model trained on SE data and attribute all authors, will SE Inc. not charge them?

I read Is SE [going to be] selling our content for AI model training? And what exactly does "reinvest back into our communities" mean?. SE Inc. indicates that the will charge some firms if ...
Franck Dernoncourt's user avatar
37 votes
2 answers
967 views

Can SE just resell our data, relicense it and remove the attribution requirement?

SE has decided to charge for the network content when used for training AI according to an article. This has not been officially announced here, so we do not know the details. But the main question to ...
Mad Scientist's user avatar
126 votes
7 answers
4k views

Is SE [going to be] selling our content for AI model training? And what exactly does "reinvest back into our communities" mean?

Wired published an article titled Stack Overflow Will Charge AI Giants for Training Data. I read through it, and a few sections seemed noteworthy to me "Community platforms that fuel LLMs ...
cocomac's user avatar
  • 14.3k
2 votes
0 answers
88 views

YouTube channel scraping Q&A from Stack Exchange [duplicate]

There is this horrible YouTube channel scraping Q&A from Stack Exchange without attribution to the author of either question or answers, and no links to the original post. Stack Exchange licenses ...
rhermans's user avatar
  • 175
8 votes
1 answer
114 views

License link on SEDE archive page points to wrong BY-SA version

On the Stack Exchange Data Explorer Help page, there is a link to the Internet Archive page. On the Stack Exchange Archive page, there is a section for licensing, with the following description: All ...
Arulkumar's user avatar
  • 38.9k
9 votes
0 answers
110 views

Post disassociation requests should also apply to the author's messages in chat rooms generated from comments on the post

A while ago I made a question, and later decided to be disassociated from that question. However doing so does not completely disassociate your account from this question. If a comment thread gets ...
Topcode's user avatar
  • 247
10 votes
0 answers
70 views

Show license info for tag excerpts and wikis explicitly

All user contributions on Stack Exchange are licensed (currently under CC-BY-SA 4.0). Back in 2020, Creative Commons Licensing UI and Data Updates made a change in showing the license explicitly for Q&...
Meta Andrew T.'s user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
71 views

Make license terms more prominent

A lot of people are unaware of license terms that apply to code pieces posted on Stack Overflow or the internet in general. This is from my own experience but is also stated in a paper here. And some ...
Sam's user avatar
  • 151
2 votes
0 answers
88 views

How to give attribution when using the same code on multiple webpages [closed]

I am very new to the Stack Overflow community. I noticed that there are several excellent answers here that can help me to build a website. I am a little bit aware of the License CC BY-SA 4.0 applied ...
User's user avatar
  • 129
3 votes
0 answers
219 views

Do I have to worry about patent issues for code posted on Stack Overflow?

I purposely named this question similar to Do I have to worry about copyright issues for code posted on Stack Overflow?. Since Fedora is banning CC-0 licensed source code citing issue of explicitly ...
Yao Wei's user avatar
  • 69
27 votes
2 answers
810 views

What license do the help center articles that are editable by moderators fall under?

I was looking at the text of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, which is the license used by posts on the SE network. Specifically, I noted the phrase that... You must give appropriate credit, provide a link ...
Mithical's user avatar
  • 83.1k
9 votes
1 answer
142 views

Who has ownership of a Question/Answer after the account that posted it is deleted? [duplicate]

There has been some questions surrounding post ownership after a user voluntarily deleted their account and now they have a new account on the site. In a recent meta they referenced it as their post ...
Dom's user avatar
  • 2,725
12 votes
1 answer
453 views

Form to request erasure under GDPR doesn't indicate that attribution will be removed from all posts, a possible license violation

It's long been the case that when a user requests their account be deleted, all of their contributions are dissociated from their name. This would ordinarily be considered a violation of the CC BY-SA ...
Sonic the Anonymous Hedgehog's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
54 views

Why does the license link take me to Stack Overflow's license page? [duplicate]

The license information in the lower right corner of every page links to https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing instead of to the site's (existing) corresponding page (for example, on the Cross ...
tripleee's user avatar
  • 14.5k
17 votes
1 answer
428 views

Can I make a YouTube video adapting Stack Overflow content?

There are many interesting questions on Stack Overflow, that have many good answers and many good comments. I want to make an animated YouTube video about a question and some answers to help visual ...
Fee's user avatar
  • 273
-7 votes
1 answer
146 views

Why does my comment show 41 "license: CC by SA 4.0"? Are all comments protected under copyright?

Why does my comment show this? 41 license: CC by SA 4.0 Are all comments protected under "creative commons" copyright? What does 41 mean? Why not 1 license - why 41?
Pretty Girl's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
447 views

How can I correctly specify the license for my code snippets? [duplicate]

Per default, code snippets posted on Stack Overflow are licensed under CC BY-SA-*; see https://stackoverflow.com/help/licensing. This includes a share-alike obligation and attribution obligation, both ...
matheburg's user avatar
  • 170
4 votes
2 answers
135 views

Is it against the rules to link from my own, monetized site to a question or answer on SE?

I want to document my progress on various projects and, as part of that documentation, I want to publish the questions I ask on the various SE sites. The website will be monetized. The questions I ask ...
tem's user avatar
  • 51
-25 votes
1 answer
252 views

Tags assigned to a question should be CC BY-SA licensed

Glorfindel♦ wrote: The CC BY-SA license only covers content. Tags are (apparently) considered metadata. Feature request: Tags assigned to a question should be CC BY-SA licensed. Answers to comments:...
Franck Dernoncourt's user avatar
9 votes
1 answer
133 views

Why aren't tag edits and comments licensed as CC BY-SA 4.0 in post timelines?

E.g.: Why aren't tag edits and comments licensed as CC BY-SA 4.0 in post timelines?
Franck Dernoncourt's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
181 views

Can I reuse and republish code snippets from Stack Exchange sites under a new license?

I want to start a project, Scheme Cookbook, with a better license because an old cookbook, that is no longer available online, was licensed under LGPL, which requires the inclusion of the license with ...
jcubic's user avatar
  • 265
22 votes
0 answers
416 views

To who are translations licensed in Stack Exchange international sites that are submitted by community users?

International sites translate much of their content (other than questions and answers) with the help of community users. How are these contributions licensed? There are more than 10,000 strings, not a ...
cubick's user avatar
  • 3,058
4 votes
1 answer
138 views

Can “Community Wiki” become public domain? [duplicate]

What is the license of an answer marked community wiki? It seems a normal answer is CC-BY-SA, which can possibly not be kept for community wiki contributions, since the author becomes the community. ...
user avatar
-10 votes
1 answer
188 views

Do users have right to not allow redistribution of their posts?

In my understanding, the CC BY-SA 4.0 license allows me to redistribute any material posted in Stack Exchange, as long as I put a link back to the original post. Does that mean a user has a right to ...
Ooker's user avatar
  • 6,016
16 votes
2 answers
196 views

Is moving self-answers in questions into separate answers under the Community user valid under CC BY-SA?

Prompted by my question at How best to deal with self-answers edited into questions? which was somewhat answered with a link to What to do when OP answers his/her own question in an edit?, which then ...
Ian Kemp's user avatar
  • 4,102
11 votes
2 answers
167 views

Can I include material from Wikipedia in a Stack Exchange post?

Now that Stack is on CC BY-SA 4.0, is it possible to include material from Wikipedia, which still uses CC BY-SA 3.0? I have no desire to be a lawyer, but I'm given to understand that the two licenses ...
rici's user avatar
  • 413
16 votes
1 answer
172 views

If a user copies content from another SO post into his own post verbatim, is the attribution required according to the license?

Backstory: We recently had a situation on ru.SO, where a new user had posted 22 answers in 2 hours, 17 of which were copy-pasted from comments under the corresponding questions. Most of them were ...
HolyBlackCat's user avatar
  • 5,208
3 votes
1 answer
103 views

Rollback of a post to a revision with an older license version does not make the post relate to that older license version

A month ago it was noticed that a rollback could change the license version backwards. In a comment, it was noted by Yaakov Ellis that the license version on a post should relate to the license ...
Sextus Empiricus's user avatar
33 votes
1 answer
465 views

Adding a bounty should not change the license of a post

I found a minor bug, and after a search here on Meta.SE, I discovered that it had been reported all the way back in 2013. To draw a bit of attention to it, I then added a bounty to the post. The past ...
Mithical's user avatar
  • 83.1k
7 votes
0 answers
183 views

Just to clarify the attribution requirements

When a question or answer was posted under one license (e.g. CC BY-SA 3.0), and edited under a different license (e.g. CC BY-SA 4.0), who should be credited as the "author" for attribution ...
jkdev's user avatar
  • 1,668
23 votes
1 answer
735 views

CommonMark migration is causing license changes when it should not

CommonMark migration has begun! Sites across the network have been scheduled for formatting migration, and some of them (Meta Stack Exchange included) have already finished their migration. It was ...
Spevacus's user avatar
  • 27.4k
1 vote
0 answers
76 views

I've found an exact copy of a Stack Exchange site answer without giving any credit, is that legal? [duplicate]

I was searching for answers for one of many daily issues we all normally have and found something quite odd. After finding this answer Stack Overflow, I've stumbled upon this one, which is an exact ...
Bernardo Duarte's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
58 views

Stack Exchange Data Dumps still indicating old attribution requirements

The Stack Exchange Data Dumps still contain wording mandating that attribution be given in specific ways, going beyond the Creative Commons licensing requirements: Specifically the attribution ...
a3nm's user avatar
  • 217

1
2 3 4 5 6