Questions tagged [licensing]
Questions about the licensing of content on Stack Exchange sites.
116
questions
230
votes
10
answers
23k
views
Is it legal to copy Stack Overflow questions and answers?
I just found http://programmingfaq.w3ec.com/faq/4761/whats-the-hi-lo-algorithm which has an exact copy of this Stack Overflow question, What's the Hi/Lo Algorithm, with all its answers and no ...
- 3,072
-452
votes
24
answers
98k
views
Stack Exchange and Stack Overflow have moved to CC BY-SA 4.0
Effective today, all Subscriber Content on Stack Overflow and the Stack Exchange network will be available under the terms of version 4.0 of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) ...
- 181k
-342
votes
60
answers
96k
views
A New Code License: The MIT, this time with Attribution Required
Update: January 15, 2016
Thank you for your patience and feedback. The changes proposed here have been delayed indefinitely - we'll be back later to open some more discussions.
Important context for ...
- 5,210
542
votes
58
answers
99k
views
The MIT License – Clarity on Using Code on Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange
Update (Dec. 22, 2015): Thanks, everyone, for your feedback to this proposal. We're going to digest this one over the holidays and should have a follow-up announcement answering your questions and ...
- 5,210
41
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Where can I ask about Software Licenses/Licensing?
Is it appropriate to ask questions about software licenses/licensing on StackOverflow? Or is the appropriate place Programmers Stack Exchange? Or is there no appropriate site currently and we should ...
- 1,209
229
votes
23
answers
20k
views
Creative Commons Licensing UI and Data Updates
When we last updated you to clarify concerns and answer questions about our transition to version 4.0 of the CC BY-SA license we committed to posting updates to the UI and addressing unanswered ...
- 61.7k
67
votes
5
answers
29k
views
What is up with the source code license on Stack Overflow? [duplicate]
I know this has been asked several times. I've read the responses. I'm still very confused.
What are the legal requirements for using samples from SO in other projects? If there are requirements, ...
- 781
111
votes
7
answers
3k
views
Is SE [going to be] selling our content for AI model training? And what exactly does "reinvest back into our communities" mean?
Wired published an article titled Stack Overflow Will Charge AI Giants for Training Data. I read through it, and a few sections seemed noteworthy to me
"Community platforms that fuel LLMs ...
- 11.6k
446
votes
21
answers
26k
views
An Update On Creative Commons Licensing
We’d like to provide you with an update to our transition to version 4.0 of the CC BY-SA license. We realize that this is something that you care deeply about, and that our response to your concerns ...
- 181k
38
votes
6
answers
1k
views
Dealing with posts plagiarising from copyrighted sources
What means do users have to report plagiarism or posting of copyrighted work?
A button to flag content as plagiarism would be useful. It's not quite "offensive," and should probably have a different ...
- 481
314
votes
5
answers
10k
views
Was the retroactive change to CC BY-SA 4.0 approved by Stack Exchange's lawyers?
Update: I have started a GoFundMe in an attempt to have a court or arbitrator settle this. It has raised a decent amount, but more will be necessary to retain counsel.
On 2019-09-05, Stack Exchange ...
- 4,588
40
votes
2
answers
2k
views
Stack Exchange should stop using the Creative Commons logo [duplicate]
If I understand correctly, SE reproduces its user-produced content using a CC-BY-SA license with additional restrictions: namely, from point 3 of the TOS,
In the event that You post or otherwise use ...
- 3,942
259
votes
2
answers
6k
views
Will concerns regarding the move to CC BY-SA 4.0 elicit any further dialogue from Stack Exchange, Inc.?
Fifteen days ago, it was suddenly announced that the user-contributed content on Stack Exchange had been relicensed as CC BY SA 4.0.
The change took immediate and retroactive effect and is still in ...
- 34.9k
35
votes
8
answers
4k
views
I'm worried about Stack Overflow content licensing [duplicate]
Strongly related: Do I have to worry about copyright issues for code posted on Stack Overflow?
It appears that all the submitted content on Stack Overflow is licensed under the Creative Commons (CC) ...
- 477
2
votes
1
answer
505
views
Scrapers enter the scene - was the choice of license right?
Looks like scrapers can rank higher than the original SE universe site in Google search so that there's this very uncomfortable "first tag in the page title" change to combat them.
Also looks like ...
- 5,544
35
votes
3
answers
913
views
Are the SE additions to the Creative Commons attribution requirements enforceable? [duplicate]
In the footer of Stack Exchange sites, it is stated that user contributions are licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 with a contradictory and incompatible attribution requirement addendum.
The “attribution ...
- 475
20
votes
0
answers
616
views
What licence is subscriber content provided under 4.0, 3.0 or them all?
In the footer it says:
site design / logo © 2018 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required. rev 2018.8.7.31273
However, in the footer under ...
- 3,627
10
votes
1
answer
900
views
Should Stack Exchange switch to CC BY-SA 3.0? [duplicate]
Currently, Stack Exchange sites use the CC BY-SA 2.5 license.
There's a lot of content (not the least of which is Wikipedia) under the newer 3.0 version of this license.
Content licensed under 2.5 ...
- 4,487
76
votes
6
answers
919
views
What is "code" for the purposes of the proposed MIT license switchover? [closed]
A follow up from my comment about the new license announcement and samthebrand's response (also from the new license change attempt):
The proposed new licensing terms differentiate between code and ...
10
votes
3
answers
1k
views
Is there a list of non-moderators who have stated they suspended activities due to recent events? [closed]
There are lists of moderators that have resigned or suspended activity due to the series of events1 instigated by Stack Exchange starting September 5, 2019, but I've only seen speculation on the ...
41
votes
4
answers
984
views
Please negotiate and make obvious user-favorable license terms for uploaded images
Uploading photos to Imgur appears to assign them rights to do whatever they wish with them.
It would appear that, taken on face value, uploading an image to Imgur gives them total non-exclusive rights ...
- 2,109
29
votes
2
answers
532
views
Can SE just resell our data, relicense it and remove the attribution requirement?
SE has decided to charge for the network content when used for training AI according to an article. This has not been officially announced here, so we do not know the details.
But the main question to ...
- 185k
23
votes
1
answer
732
views
CommonMark migration is causing license changes when it should not
CommonMark migration has begun!
Sites across the network have been scheduled for formatting migration, and some of them (Meta Stack Exchange included) have already finished their migration.
It was ...
- 26.6k
19
votes
2
answers
3k
views
Using code posted on StackOverflow
I was wondering what kind of restrictions there are, if any, for code posted on StackOverflow?
In other words, I'm hoping StackOverflow has a clause that makes any posted code completely free of ...
- 521
18
votes
4
answers
530
views
Data dump should include deleted posts
Given that deleted content is licensed CC just as the regular content is, it exists in the current SO database, and it is accessible to over 400 (10k+ rep) users, it should also be exported as part of ...
- 76.2k
18
votes
3
answers
465
views
Why don’t we call our licence by name?
Why does Stack Exchange use this weird “cc-wiki” euphemism instead of calling the CC-BY-SA by its real name?
This is a bug report disguised as a question. As in: please fix the footer.
- 818
18
votes
6
answers
663
views
How should a SO answer be credited when used in an open-source project?
I've looked through a few of the questions about the licensing of posts on SO, but haven't found any really satisfactory answers. Can an answer be used in an open source project (with an MIT license)? ...
- 356
13
votes
1
answer
476
views
When did Stack Exchange start to dual-license user content?
Stack Exchange currently dual-licenses user content, which allows them to sell user content without attributing users. When did the dual-licensing start?
The Wayback Machine's first save of the ToS ...
- 34.8k
13
votes
4
answers
7k
views
Is copy-pasting code from Stack Overflow an infringement to CC BY-SA 3.0 or is it considered fair use?
Actually CC BY-SA 3.0 is a license which looks pretty good for most Stack Exchange Network sites, but on Stack Overflow which is used mainly for coding questions, is pretty much rigid since a lot of ...
- 273
6
votes
3
answers
297
views
Ownership of content in Community Wiki posts
The CC-Wiki license makes use of the term "the author."
When Bob makes a post, it's obvious Bob "owns" the content, but what happens when he checks the Community Wiki button? Does it become the ...
- 23k
3
votes
0
answers
128
views
Is reposting one's own content from a Stack Exchange site after the fact, without attributing its source, allowed? [duplicate]
Possible Duplicate:
Who owns the copyright to S[OFU] content?
According to the second paragraph of section 3 of the Stack Exchange terms of service (the paragraph starting with "In the event that ...
- 3,467
73
votes
4
answers
930
views
Code licensing proposal — Point of order!
There have been two rounds of discussion about code licensing:
The MIT License – Clarity on Using Code on Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange
A New Code License: The MIT, this time with Attribution ...
- 12.4k
53
votes
3
answers
2k
views
EU copyright laws (2018-2019). Any risk for Stack Exchange?
The European Parliament JURI committee will be voting on 20th June 2018 on reforms of the EU copyright laws (full law proposal). According to a Creative Commons article titled 'Act now to stop the EU’...
- 2,983
43
votes
2
answers
718
views
How can SE gate access to the Dump that will allow individuals access to the data while preventing "misuse" by for-profit organizations?
I read this answer written by Jody Bailey:
We are looking for ways to gate access to the Dump, APIs, and SEDE, that will allow individuals access to the data while preventing misuse by organizations ...
- 34.8k
32
votes
12
answers
1k
views
A New Code License: the Community Edition
Okay, so that proposal didn't go very well...
Clearly, the community thinks Stack Overflow, Inc messed up with their license proposal. Now it is time to you to prove we, as a community, can do better....
- 91.5k
28
votes
1
answer
324
views
Why separate code and non-code licensing?
The rationale for the license change proposals is at least somewhat clear: i.e. to reduce legal concerns of using code from answers in software that may use incompatible licenses. However, what seems ...
- 587
19
votes
5
answers
5k
views
What license should be on sample code?
I noticed today that stackoverflow's cc-wiki (aka creative commons attribution/share alike license) does not allow the answers to questions to be used in commercial products.
Very specificially, and ...
- 331
18
votes
1
answer
337
views
Do I have to give attribution to SO when using my own content elsewhere?
Content on SE sites is licensed under CC-BY-SA.
If I write a question/answer on your sites, do I still have copyright of the text I entered or does SE now hold all copyright to it? Can I put an ...
- 4,005
17
votes
0
answers
122
views
When adding image from Wikimedia Commons, automatically add author/license/link
Many Stack Exchange questions and answers embed images from Wikimedia Commons. It is probably the most used image source here.
The good news
Thanks to their license, all images from Wikimedia Commons ...
- 2,446
14
votes
2
answers
951
views
Is SE in violation of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license by not providing data dumps?
SE is no longer providing data dumps for the content contributed by their users.
CC BY-SA 4.0 states:
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally ...
- 1,041
11
votes
2
answers
346
views
May I edit a question with a JSFiddle link to incorporate the code?
Consider a JSFiddle with no explicit license like this one: https://jsfiddle.net/t12qqyok/57/
In JSFiddle's Credits and Legal we can read:
License
All code posted to the site belongs to the poster ...
- 2,487
6
votes
2
answers
1k
views
Can licensing questions EVER be on-topic? [closed]
The licensing Tag
I ran across a specific question today that prompted me to ask why we have a licensing tag at all when its tag wiki currently says:
Excerpt: Don't use this tag to ask for legal ...
- 6,001
5
votes
2
answers
232
views
Publishing a book - "Best programming Q&A" from SO contents?
Is it possible to publish a book made entirely out of SO questions and answers?
The idea is to publish the book freely online, and to sell kindle and printed copies on Amazon.com. Proper attribution ...
- 2,555
4
votes
2
answers
661
views
Can Stack Exchange be customized to specific projects? [duplicate]
We are a NGO looking for something 99% similar to Stack Overflow for analyzing and suggesting improvements in legislation.
I have tried searching for terms and conditions for getting Stack Overflow ...
- 140
3
votes
1
answer
262
views
What should you do if other sites shamelessly copy content and the cc-wiki license is not adhered to? [duplicate]
Copying content is one thing, but copying content without referring to or quoting the original is just plain rude and violates the cc-wiki license and the clearly laid out attribution rules of this ...
- 2,635
-1
votes
2
answers
153
views
Will we be able to use code from Wikipedia after the Licensing change?
Will we be able to use code snippets from Wikipedia after this proposal is implemented?
Of course, we don't use code snippets from Wikipedia that often. I was just wondering.
- 1,524
-14
votes
2
answers
446
views
Is a refusal to disassociate deleted posts in compliance with the CC BY-SA license? [closed]
I asked Stack Exchange staff to remove attribution on some of my deleted answers.
They suggested I delete my account to remove attribution. I have asked them if they will restore attribution on other ...
user369690
43
votes
8
answers
2k
views
Is the re-licensing situation perceived as much less important than Monica's defamation lawsuit? [closed]
When one compares the two (currently) relevant GoFundMe pages Defend Monica from Defamation by Stack Overflow and Lawsuit against Stack Exchange relicensing it is obvious that the first one attracts ...
- 38k
40
votes
4
answers
2k
views
CC-by-SA vs MIT - The 2016 battle
Stack Exchange is announcing the change from CC-BY-SA 3.0 to MIT License and the chaos has emerged.
After a few hours of research, I've concluded that I've been breaking the law (license) since the ...
40
votes
6
answers
1k
views
In which context would the difference in licensing rules between CC SA 3.0 and CC SA 4.0 actually matter?
Currently there's a big controversy over SE changing the licensing from CC 3.0 to CC 4.0. Regardless of whether this change was legally solid or not, could someone provide a specific example of how ...
- 2,792